The discussion of using the Tomahawk components without Tiles had raised my
hopes. My app uses Tiles extensively without JSF, so removing Tiles from
the app is not practical. However based on Rodrigo's comment, I was hoping
that removing Tiles from the relevant page only would work. No such luc
OK, so you have an object in session scope under the key 'AFFFiles',
which is an ArrayList containing FileObj instances. Did you mean to fill
it with the FileReceiptFormBean instances instead maybe? If not, what
properties does a FileObj have?
L.
Swaminathan Subramanian wrote:
Hi Laurie!
Tha
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are you suggesting that maybe a FORM tag is written
> if you modify the templates?
>
> On 3/10/07, Ian Roughley wrote:
>> I haven't looked lately, but I imagine there is a
>> tag in there somewhere, otherwise I don't
see
>> how it would work.
I think he's suggest
Let me break this down for you:
If you use the xhtml theme, it generates a table for the form, an each input
element is placed on a row with its label.
If you use the simple theme, it is just that, a form with input elements.
If you want to use divs, you can just overwrite one of the themes if
This is crazy! Are you suggesting that maybe a FORM tag is written if you
modify the templates? I would understand if you said maybe there is not a
FORM tag generated if you DO modify the templates! Any solid framework
should be usable first and modifiable second. Is the framework usable witho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to agree with stanlick with this.
I would agree more work need to be done.
I have abandoned in my project the more complex themes of struts and kept
it in the "simple" theme (with customized tag templates here and there)
because of these "" tags coming out
respect for the http://www.ghettojava.com/blog/default/ .
2007/3/9, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 3/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is also much confusion across the board regarding WW and S2. Are
they
> the same? Is support dead for S1? Unless you have had
7 matches
Mail list logo