[OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread DGraham
I'm preparing to make a case for switching to a differenct SCM tool (source code management). The options are CVS, Perforce, and VSS. Anybody have any cogent/credible stories or arguments for choosing one over the other? Thanks, Dennis

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Ed Griebel
VSS- walk away, don't make eye contact :-) Pros: umm, it does manage versions, close integration with MS VisualStudio Cons: windows-only administration and probably access too, not intuitive to use, opaque binary files having no discernable relation to the actual artifacts themselves, not cheap

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread David Haynes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm preparing to make a case for switching to a differenct SCM tool (source code management). The options are CVS, Perforce, and VSS. Anybody have any cogent/credible stories or arguments for choosing one over the other? Thanks, Dennis CVS seems to be the

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Michael Jouravlev
On 9/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm preparing to make a case for switching to a differenct SCM tool (source code management). The options are CVS, Perforce, and VSS. Anybody have any cogent/credible stories or arguments for choosing one over the other? Perforce:

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Larry Meadors
Seriously consider SVN, too if possible. From what I am hearing, all Apache projects will be on SVN within the next year. CVS is getting a bit long in the tooth but works well for everything i have ever needed. VSS is IMO a waste of digital storage that could have been better used for something

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Dave Newton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm preparing to make a case for switching to a differenct SCM tool (source code management). The options are CVS, Perforce, and VSS. VSS: *hurl* I can' recall a time where I've ever thought Whew, thank goodness I'm using VSS and horror stories abound. Perforce:

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Jesus M. Rodriguez
I would avoid VSS at all costs, its merge capabilities are less than stellar, which makes it hard for two developers to change the same file. Perforce works well. I like the changelist concept and it integrates well with bug tools like TeamTrack, etc. Its biggest con is cost. CVS while very

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Bob Arnott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm preparing to make a case for switching to a differenct SCM tool (source code management). The options are CVS, Perforce, and VSS. Anybody have any cogent/credible stories or arguments for choosing one over the other? Don't touch Perforce with a barge pole it

Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?)

2005-09-16 Thread Martin Gainty
Subject: Re: [OT] SCM stories (war? horror?) VSS- walk away, don't make eye contact :-) Pros: umm, it does manage versions, close integration with MS VisualStudio Cons: windows-only administration and probably access too, not intuitive to use, opaque binary files having no discernable relation