Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-29 Thread Dakota Jack
Gandhi walked to the sea to get salt for poor people who were dying. His humming is a mantra related to a sacred religious practice. I really cannot see you as a Gandhi, Henri. But, your perception of yourself is your business. This was not directed to you. I am starting to think that people

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-29 Thread Vinny
Actually he has. The apache project known as iBAtis: http://ibatis.apache.org In closing, Larry, who are you to be telling me that I should be doing this, that or the other thing? Have you made any comparable contribution to this application space? Jonathan Revusky -- lead developer,

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-29 Thread Jonathan Revusky
talks. I don't know the extent of his contribution there but I'm surprised. Still, Larry's involvement in iBatis is not relevant to the overall argument I made in the original Debate and Free Speech 101 post. To engage in political speech about certain problems does not oblige the speaker to go

Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Jonathan Revusky
Larry Meadors wrote: LOL, Jon, do you read your own posts? On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do keep your eye on the ball, Paul. These people have had every chance to respond to my points via legitimate debate and they chose not to. OK, so what you are saying here is

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Man there are some kickes in the ass wasted in this world. On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Larry Meadors wrote: LOL, Jon, do you read your own posts? On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do keep your eye on the ball, Paul. These people have had

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Dave Newton
Jonathan Revusky wrote: Paul really seemed to see moral equivalence between me and the people engaging in the vicious attacks -- consider James Mitchell, who was posting a private message in public in order to fan the flames. Or in order to point out what an ass you really are or how you

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Jonathan Revusky
Dave Newton wrote: Jonathan Revusky wrote: Paul really seemed to see moral equivalence between me and the people engaging in the vicious attacks -- consider James Mitchell, who was posting a private message in public in order to fan the flames. Or in order to point out what an ass you

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Larry Meadors
*sigh* Enough noise. On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Dakota Jack
Thank you for this decision from on high, Dreary Morals. I guess you are going to stop the car now? LOL Sorry about the anagram. I couldn't resist. Anyway, I think that people should talk if they want to even if you and others with this God-complex want them to stop. Just don't read it for

Re: Debate and Free Speech 101

2006-03-28 Thread Henri Yandell
I've always thought I had a Gandhi complex, not a God one. *Sits in the road and hums until people are nice to each other and other such things that only happen in cartoons for 5 year olds - like talking goldfish* Hen On 3/28/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for this decision