Hi,
Ive been trying to run the cpp client through .net framework(by including
the library and header files in the .net project). However it throws a
runtime error [exactly at a dymanic_cast IOTransport* ioTransport =
dynamic_castIOTransport*( next ); in TcpTransport.cpp] and doesnt do
Thanks for the reply.
My application is a cpp based one under .net 2003 framework and hence i am
trying to make use of the cpp client. The cpp client available here is for
VS2005 and hence this runtime error.(It compiled after quite a few
add/remove dependencies). Please advice..
James.Strachan
Hi all,
Have anyone tried a simple message forward between brokers.
I have a simple scenario with localBroker and remoteBroker. I want to
forward messages arriving on certain topics (i.e. include.test.bar.topic1and
include.test.bar.topic2) from localBroker to remoteBroker. When I try ythe
On 5/3/07, dr.jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good, excellent even, and nearly working.
:)
This:
camelContext id=camel
xmlns=http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/camel-1.0.xsd;
endpoint id=endpoint1 uri=direct:start/
endpoint id=endpoint2 uri=mock:end/
route
from
Hi James
The problem is resolved as I missed connection.start()
I could not connect either ways
But can u let me know about deleting the Queue contents as even I m setting
the Delivery mode to Non Persistent I am having a dispatch count of 6181
-Original Message-
From:
BTW your previous issue was in the FAQ too...
http://activemq.apache.org/i-am-not-receiving-any-messages-what-is-wrong.html
On 5/3/07, Jignesh ShaH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the code of the producer with the explicit Broker running as service
on the same machine as the producer :
Yup I came to know that later
I wanna delete the contents of the Queue even if I am restarting the broker
the dispatch count just increases everytime
Regards
Jignesh
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 3:02 PM
To:
On 5/4/07, Jignesh ShaH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup I came to know that later
I wanna delete the contents of the Queue even if I am restarting the broker
the dispatch count just increases everytime
Dispatch count starts at zero and keeps growing as you run a broker.
If you use
Even if I send only 5 messages once every time the consumer fires a receive
consumer get the 5 messages even if I am using the non persistent delivery
mode and have set the connectionFactory.setDispatchAsync(false); also
connectionFactory.setOptimizedMessageDispatch(false);
Please let me know
I don't know anyone that has tried to use ActiveMQ-CPP within the .Net
Framework. I don't really know much about it, if you get it working you
are welcome to contribute some VC2003 project files. :)
cppUser wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
My application is a cpp based one under .net 2003
Can you provide sample code that demonstrates the problem?
Kok Hoor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use the ActiveMQ CPP 2.0 library to develop an XPCOM
component to enable Mozilla XULRunner to use JMS messaging.
However, one problem I face is, when the ActiveMQ Server is down, and
the
jlim wrote:
For topics the consumer must be created first since messages are only
delivered to the available consumers at the time the broker receives the
message.
For durable subscribers you can create a durable subscriber, kill it,
run the producer, then start the subscriber
On 5/4/07, Bai Shen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jlim wrote:
For topics the consumer must be created first since messages are only
delivered to the available consumers at the time the broker receives the
message.
For durable subscribers you can create a durable subscriber, kill it,
run
Well, send that patch anyways :) Even if it's not used we get to see
what worked for you. If it at least does not break other builds, it
might have a good chance of getting applied.
On a sort of related note, anybody have good experience on how we can
ensure that bug fix releases stay source
I mistakenly hijacked another thread yesterday when asking this, so I'll
repost it as it's own thread.
If I understand the wiki and comments I've read on this list recently, AMQ
has no state synchronizer.
Meaning that if I have Master / Slave and the Master dies, i can't restart
it without
Hi,
I copied code from the activemq cpp example to create a Consumer which
inherits from Runnable. My OnException handler calls a cleanup function that
performs the following, but fails during the 'delete session' line. In
addition, the catch is not able to catch the exception, and the
Hi,
I am trying install activemq cpp 2.0 on mac os x 10.4.9.As the automake
supplied is obsolete, i am using the latest release, (1.9.6) and cppunit
1.11.6
Once i launch autogen.sh, i have this message:
aclocal: configure.ac: 86: macro `AM_PATH_CPPUNIT' not found in library
autoreconf:
I have autoconf v2.60 on OS X 10.4.9 and it works fine for me.
How did u install cppunit?
-Original Message-
From: didyeah971 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:34 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Problem for installin ActiveMQ CPP on MAC OS X Tiger
Hello:
I am looking for help to get Active MQ and SQl Server 2005 running.
When I run Active MQ 4.1.1 configurued to use persistence SQL Server 2005
I get the following error.
ERROR DefaultDatabaseLocker - Failed to acquire lock:
com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Line
If you use a shared DB or file system you should be able to failover
and fail back without a problem.
On 5/4/07, David Budworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I mistakenly hijacked another thread yesterday when asking this, so I'll
repost it as it's own thread.
If I understand the wiki and comments
I am using a very simple config of embedded, networked brokers to
facilitate inter-cluster communication in my app. I am using
multicast networkConnectors as indicated in the file below.
Everything works fine until I disable the network on one node. As
expected the remaining nodes loose
true, but I was shooting for zero message loss and reasonably high
performance with no single points of failure
shared db will put us right back at single point of failure(db) that we're
looking to avoid with MasterSlave
On 5/4/07, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you use a shared DB
I have a situation where we want to have a non-persistent topic and run a
master/slave configuration with our brokers. The problem is that if we
define the broker as non-persistent a broker is started on each server in
our cluster. Without defining something like the jdbcPersistenceAdapter we
Hello:
I am attempting to use MS SQL Server 2005 for persistence storage.
My ACTIVEMQ.XML is below. Please note I added the useDatabaseLock=false
to persistenceAdapter
as per a posting on this site. Made a prior issue go away.
Now when I boot ActiveMQ 4.1.1 I get the following:
24 matches
Mail list logo
