We have a distributed architecture with two brokers connnected to each other
through WAN.
We configured it using network of brokers.
One producer sends messages to a distributed queue named aqueue on broker
A.
One consumer consume messages from the queue aqueue on broker B.
I thought activemq
I would like to use the ActiveMQ feature Exclusive Consumer in a cluster of
weblogic JMS. Is this possible? if yes how to achive it. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-there-any-way-to-consume-messaes-from-weblogic-JMS-using-ActiveMQ-tp18378727p18378727.html
Sent
I discovered that the message transfer between network of brokers is handled
by DemandForwardingBridgeSupport class and there is some comment on async
send mode will be assumed between brokers if the producer send the message
to the queue using async send mode which will cause small probability
It is sad that the activemq message sending is default to sync send.
So this issue is still open.
Please provide help!
Bryan.Shaw wrote:
I discovered that the message transfer between network of brokers is
handled by DemandForwardingBridgeSupport class and there is some comment
on async
Thanks, Nate
Yes, we're using a C++ compiler. Openwire C client was one of the
alternatives. The other one is CPP but we were a bit afraid about the
integration of CPP API code (threading and so) with our event loop. So, we
have tried the other one as first choice. Now, we'll have a look to
andrewh wrote:
andrewh wrote:
[snip...]
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1786
I think I could be experiencing this issue. It is the
$ACTIVEMQ_HOME/data/brokername/journal folder that is filling up. Still,
any comments on my config are appreciated.
Rgds,
On 10 Jul 2008, at 10:04, mallikarjun wrote:
I would like to use the ActiveMQ feature Exclusive Consumer in a
cluster of
weblogic JMS. Is this possible? if yes how to achive it. Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
This is currently only the case if you are using duplex connections -
or the message was originally sent using async send from the client
(e.g. non-persistent) - as the network tries to maintain the same QOS
as used by the original producer
cheers,
Rob
On 10 Jul 2008, at 10:34,
Hi Andrew - will have a look
btw - who did you have training with ?
cheers,
Rob
On 10 Jul 2008, at 11:13, andrewh wrote:
andrewh wrote:
andrewh wrote:
[snip...]
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1786
I think I could be experiencing this issue. It is the
Hi Rob, that's much appreciated. The training was with your good selves at
IONA :)
Best,
Andrew
rajdavies wrote:
Hi Andrew - will have a look
btw - who did you have training with ?
cheers,
Rob
--
View this message in context:
bump
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to%3A-Slow-consumers-and-CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE--tp18356204p18380884.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I believe that's the pub-sub behavior. A message on a topic should be sent to
all registered subscribers. If you need the message to be processed only
once, your should use queues instead.
Regards
Sachin
-Original Message-
From: Manish1985 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July
Hello,
I am using activeMQ for one of our projects where a Java applet is used
to consume messages from JMS queues. During our tests, we discovered
that the number of consumers for each queue was not corresponding to the
number of connected clients but was way higher (not everytime indeed,
but
FYI, You don't have to use the asynchronous consumers. You can always
poll for new messages with a call to receive(). That way the
threading shouldn't be an issue for you.
Nate
On Jul 10, 2008, at 3:10 AM, Joselu wrote:
Thanks, Nate
Yes, we're using a C++ compiler. Openwire C client
On 10 Jul 2008, at 12:30, bonnyr wrote:
bump
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to%3A-Slow-consumers-and-CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE--tp18356204p18380884.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I hate answering questions - with use the
On 10 Jul 2008, at 13:01, Borer Reynald wrote:
Hello,
I am using activeMQ for one of our projects where a Java applet is
used
to consume messages from JMS queues. During our tests, we discovered
that the number of consumers for each queue was not corresponding to
the
number of connected
On 10 Jul 2008, at 14:13, Yohan Liyanage wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to filter messages in a network of brokers (Store and
Forward) ?
For example, is there anyway to avoid forwarding messages which
contains a
specific property, etc to other brokers?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this
You could implement a MessageAuthorizationPolicy. The policy wold
allow/disallow messages based on a property.
See bottom of this page http://activemq.apache.org/security.html
Or a filter message pattern via Camel
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/message-filter.html
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Thanks for the bump and for the work-around!
But - turning off async dispatch reduces performance with slow consumers if
I understand correctly, so I would prefer having it on. Is there a better
solution to this? Is it a bug or do I have bad config somewhere?
rajdavies wrote:
Great! thx
Hi
I am currently using Active MQ 5.1.
I ran the query command I have pasted 2 subscriptions out of it.
DispatchedQueueSize = 0
ConnectionId = ID:qa01-44509-1214325055754-0:6
PrefetchSize = 32766
DispachedCounter = 0
DiscardedCount = 0
active = true
DequeueCounter = 1
PendingQueueSize = 0
I am not using async send from the client.
But, I am using duplex connection because one of the two brokers do not have
fixed IP Address.
How can I avoid using duplex connnection if only one IP is fixed?
rajdavies wrote:
This is currently only the case if you are using duplex connections -
Actually async is faster normally - this is a work around until 5.2 -
the issue is fixed in trunk
On 10 Jul 2008, at 16:47, Demian Mrakovich wrote:
Thanks for the bump and for the work-around!
But - turning off async dispatch reduces performance with slow
consumers if
I understand
You can't avoid duplex in this case unfortunately - will see if can
get this fixed for 5.2.
Would you like to raise an issue for it - so I don't forget ?
On 10 Jul 2008, at 17:01, Bryan.Shaw wrote:
I am not using async send from the client.
But, I am using duplex connection because one of
I am using 4.1.1.
How can I set the MaximumPendingQueueSize (without using JConsole)?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MaximumPendingQueueSize-tp18390026p18390026.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
bsnyder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:04 AM, lkwg82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
starting as root and giving processes to non-root users is common on
unixes,
it is a need for security
Yes, I'm quite familiar with it :-).
and EOL means EndOfLine, on win32 it is \r\n and on linux only
Hi,
Is there a way to set the maximum size of a Virtual Topic.
I have my queues topic set to a maximum of 50mb, but it doesn't appear to
work with VirtualTopic. Currently, I am seeing the system slow down to a
crawl when the VT takes up most of the activemq jvm memory. Any
suggestions?
1) how do I extend the following code snippet to set different TTLs on the
messages??
2) how do I print these header properties as system.println() ??
thx in advance
public final class CamelFileToJMS
{
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception
{
Jim,
Thanks a lot for the clariification. I got my integration code to work using
the latest code from SVN trunk, i can speak with the 5.1 ActiveMQ. Most of
my problems ended up being user errors, but i was a little hesitant to
rely on something with failing unit tests.
I've tested my
Thanks Joe !
I think 'MessageAuthorizationPolicy' will work for me. :)
Joe Fernandez wrote:
You could implement a MessageAuthorizationPolicy. The policy wold
allow/disallow messages based on a property.
See bottom of this page http://activemq.apache.org/security.html
Or a filter
Thanks Rob! But I wanted to filter several messages, not destinations :S.
With wildcards, I can only filter based on destination name is it?
rajdavies wrote:
On 10 Jul 2008, at 14:13, Yohan Liyanage wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway to filter messages in a network of brokers (Store and
I have already reported this issue in JIRA.
The issue key is AMQ-1845.
rajdavies wrote:
You can't avoid duplex in this case unfortunately - will see if can
get this fixed for 5.2.
Would you like to raise an issue for it - so I don't forget ?
On 10 Jul 2008, at 17:01, Bryan.Shaw
i am not sure if the firewall cause this, but why there is no exception?
i have set exception listener to this connection, under normal circumstances
it would throw exception
sparky2708 wrote:
Check your firewall. We had a similar problem - our firewall would
disconnect the connection if it
Hey,
I want to implement JMS in my application but want to make sure weather it
is possible to implement my producer code in .NET and consumer in Java ?
I am using activeMQ as my message broker.
Looking forward to hear from you soon,
Thanks Regards,
Jigar Naik.
--
View this message in
33 matches
Mail list logo