Hi,
did you try 5.2.0 version? Probably some of those issues are already
addressed.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:47 PM, mdasari
Hello,
Andreas Gies-3 wrote:
Hi there,
as for the first question. AFAIK the methods you mention just send
advisory messages
that you could monitor for the moment. I could imagine you could use
the method hooks for implementing
a broker plugin that automatically disconnects slow
Hi,
you can try the latest snapshot http://activemq.apache.org/download.html to
see if the issue has been fixed. Or you can try the latest fuse release
http://fusesource.com/products/enterprise-activemq/.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in
Hello,
I've some questions about ActiveMQ and OSGI.
As far as I know, there is two activemq jar bundlised : activemq-core and
activemq-pool. Is there any others ActiveMQ bundlised jars today ?
The other question I've is about the activemq bundleisation methodology. I
already see that you use
With Pure Master slave replication, the slave is in lock step with the
master. To make this work, the slave needs to start at the same time as the
master as there is no retrospective replication.
The master can be told to wait for a slave to connect to ensure that it does
not process work before
Hi,
does ActiveMQs STOMP implementation support sending an ACK after a SEND has
been issued? I couldn't find anything in the STOMP[1] nor ActiveMQ
documentation.
I would like to handle ERRORs when they occur and not rely on a timeout for
seeing sent messages as accepted by ActiveMQ.
Or can
Hi,
sure thing:
typically these plugins implement org.apache.activemq.broker.Broker.
There is a class BrokerPluginSupport that can serve as the base class
for your own plugins. If you are using Eclipse I would suggest to look
at the class hierarchy of those classes and have a look at some
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:47, ffrenchm ffrench.mathi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've some questions about ActiveMQ and OSGI.
As far as I know, there is two activemq jar bundlised : activemq-core and
activemq-pool. Is there any others ActiveMQ bundlised jars today ?
All ActiveMQ jars are
Hi Kim,
take a look at Receipt feature of Stomp protocol (
http://stomp.codehaus.org/Protocol#Protocol-Receipt). It will instruct the
broker to send receipts for every command it receives. You can also take a
look at PHP stomp client error handling for example of receipt usage (
Hello. I'm having issues when trying to connect using a failover on a URI
that has arguments. What happens is that the connection.start() method just
hangs forever without returning.
So...
tcp://localhost:61616?jms.dispatchAsync=false WORKS
failover://(tcp://localhost:61616) WORKS
Thank you,
works great (in my terminal). I just need to implement some more logic to make
use of it in my program.
Kind regards,
Kim
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi Kim,
take a look at Receipt feature of Stomp protocol (
http://stomp.codehaus.org/Protocol#Protocol-Receipt). It will instruct
Hi,
try failover:(tcp://localhost:61616)?jms.dispatchAsync=false
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:46 PM, dwout greenpor...@gmail.com wrote:
We would elaborate a distributed broker topography in which brokers can also
have Local queues e.g non-distributed queues which can actually be used
only into a local context.
Is it existing a way to do that the broker could contain as well distributed
queues which can be read by other brokers
check out the excludedDestinations attribute of a network xml
configuration http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html, using
this you can define local destinations that will not be distributed. This
attribute is a list or queues and or topic names.
Check out an example configuration
Thanks Dejan for the reply.
I've not tried with 5.2 as yet, but I wanted to get a confirmation on the
issue before I try pushing the new version to our servers (that is little
lengthy process). I looked at the 5.2 source code and I suspect the problem
is still there.
I'm surprised to see that
Hi,
I'm about to do a stupid thing, I know. It's not ActiveMQ on top of TCP,
it's TCP on top of ActiveMQ. I have no technical reason to do this, just the
paranoia of someone who just won't open a blessed port on his firewall.
I think I'm gonna write a proxy that listens on a local address,
16 matches
Mail list logo
