Hi,
i downloaded activemq 5.3 code and i am able to build the code in eclipse
using tips provided in other post.
for learning code from where to start ..when i import the code into eclipse
there are many projects generated
Activemq-all
Activemq-blueprint,
activemq-camel,
Activemq-console etc..
hello,
i have a network of brokers configured with four nodes where each node knows
the other three nodes through the networkConnector config. two of theses
four nodes are currently down/unavailable. the other two nodes are working
for about four hours then they die. in the log file i see a lot
Hi Daniel,
this simply means that you didn't consume from these topics. What's
the number of consumers you are seeing on these topics?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog -
Hi Sic,
failover for blob upload transfer policy is not currently implemented.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 3:01
Hi,
we tired spring integration with activeMQ 5.3.0.
we have 5 topics . 1 publisher and each topic has one subscriber.
The publisher sends each message to one topic and that was done with the
help of a router/
Now, we start the five subscribers and the publisher. the subscribers
receive the
I'm sorry to hear that.
Then, I decide either not to use them or to implement a way of failover for
my requirement.
Anyway, thank you for informing the current states.
sic
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi Sic,
failover for blob upload transfer policy is not currently implemented.
Cheers
--
hank you very much. I have updated to version 5.3.2. Now I'll monitor the
situation.
I'll also check via JMX the subscriber list. But the only subscriber are the
MDBs and all the MDBs are defined as follow:
@ActivationConfigProperty(propertyName = destinationType, propertyValue =
Hi,
I use a Pure Master/Slave configuration with ActiveMQ 5.3.2.
Master/Slave both use the same DLQ configuration with:
processExpired=true processNonPersistent=true
The normal Master/Slave processing seems to work correctly, actions on
Master are always replicated to the Slave.
But there's a
Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net writes:
[...]
Specifically, I have a topic with 13,384 Messages Enqueued, and 0 Messages
Dequeued, on the broker at both sites.
this simply means that you didn't consume from these topics. What's
the number of consumers you are seeing on these topics?
Aw,
Hi Daniel,
there's no easy way to browse topics as they have different nature
than queues.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jul 5,
Can you raise a jira issue for this NPE, there should be a check for null in
the doStop method.
On 5 July 2010 07:29, dialsc dirk.a.schae...@bluewin.ch wrote:
hello,
i have a network of brokers configured with four nodes where each node
knows
the other three nodes through the
Dejan Bosanac de...@nighttale.net writes:
Darn. That makes life harder, although I hope that I have tracked down the
source of my trouble and resolved it in the software.
Generally speaking, what would be the best approach to debugging this sort of
message leak in a topic? Should I attach an
You can try virtual topics http://activemq.apache.org/virtual-destinations.html
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:23
Update: Same problem with ActiveMQ 5.3.0, current 5.3.3- and current
5.4-SNAPSHOT.
Any ideas?
Andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Weber, Andreas, M-ED
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Juli 2010 09:47
An: 'users@activemq.apache.org'
Betreff: Pure Master/Slave Bug? Expired messages not
I have built version 3.2.1 of amq-cpp and have a serious problem when
using release mode. Debug mode is just fine.
I have built apr, apr-iconv, apr-util and expat from source.
I have added the following macros to all builds:
WIN32
_WINDOWS
NOMINMAX
_SECURE_SCL_THROWS=1
_SECURE_SCL=1
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 16:07 +0100, andrew.mar...@uk.bnpparibas.com
wrote:
I have built version 3.2.1 of amq-cpp and have a serious problem when
using release mode. Debug mode is just fine.
I have built apr, apr-iconv, apr-util and expat from source.
I have added the following macros to
There is something very screwy going on. I found an error in my release
mode build. I said
_SECURE_SCL_THROWS=1
_SECURE_SCL=1
which I am not supposed to do in release mode. I removed this and rebuilt.
The error mutated slightly but is still there. This shows that the problem
is to do with my
In my attempts to sort out what is wrong with my release mode build I am
making all the build properties identical between my app and amq-cpp. I
even made the warning levels the same, level 3. And that's when I got hit
by loads of C4290 warnings. C4290 is 'exception specification ignored'.
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 17:25 +0100, andrew.mar...@uk.bnpparibas.com
wrote:
In my attempts to sort out what is wrong with my release mode build I am
making all the build properties identical between my app and amq-cpp. I
even made the warning levels the same, level 3. And that's when I got hit
19 matches
Mail list logo
