Anyone? Does the table generation always have to be done by ActiveMQ
when it starts, or can it be done manually?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM, janne postilista
wrote:
> It seems activeMQ creates the tables (ACTIVEMQ_ACKS, LOCK, etc) when
> it starts up. Can you create the tables manually? Wher
I know that we did some internal testing with NFSv4, and it worked.
Now NFSv3 will not work, it's a matter of when you will get corruption.
--Allen
> -Original Message-
> From: johneboyer [mailto:johnboye...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:23 PM
> To: users@activemq.apache.o
Steve,
You can use a queue browse to do that. Basically, you send a message to the
queue with the information you need. Then the client will browse the queue
looking for the desired information. When you need to update that information
just consume the message and publish a new one.
You can al
Thanks again Dejan.
I think I tried this before too, but I tried it again with all the JARs from
http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/.
No luck.
What could be missing? Should I create a classpath environment variable and
point to the JARs and not use the Eclipse Run Configuration Class
Are there any recommendations or techniques for how to avoid having to
use a request/response pattern?
I'm using the technique described here
http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-implement-request-response-with-jms.html.
I'm primarily doing this to get some basic configuration information
Steve,
I believe you're looking for something similar to this:
PolicyEntry policy = new PolicyEntry();
policy.setProducerFlowControl(true);
policy.setMemoryLimit(50);
policy.setDestination(topic);
Thanks for the reference but I don't know all the classes well enough to
navigate through the javadocs and find the right information.
I have something like;
BrokerService broker = new BrokerService();
broker.setBrokerName(_host+"_"+_port);
broker.setUseJmx(true);
broker.setDataDirectory(new Fil
Thank you for the advise. Sounds like I need to go forward this project with
a willing Linux consultant.
I’ll post back to the forum with the results.
Regards,
John Boyer
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Feasibility-of-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-using
Hi Steve,
Take a look on org.apache.activemq.broker.region.policy.PolicyEntry
(http://activemq.apache.org/maven/5.3.1/activemq-core/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/policy/PolicyEntry.html)
Hope this helps,
-Marcelo
On May 19, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Steve Angelovich wrote:
> I have an
And here is probably how you want to export it...
rw,wdelay,nohide,insecure,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534
And your slave will say, IOException file "bla bal" could not be locked.
Once it times out, you failover.
On May 19, 2011, at 1:33 PM, johneboyer wrote:
> H
Does he honestly think that WIki entry was written as if it just came from the
mountain and behind a burning bush?
On May 19, 2011, at 1:33 PM, johneboyer wrote:
> He doesn’t buy it. Unfortunately, I’m not an NFS expert so I feel compelled
> to defer to his expertise.
>
> --
> View this message
He doesn’t buy it. Unfortunately, I’m not an NFS expert so I feel compelled
to defer to his expertise.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Feasibility-of-Shared-File-System-Master-Slave-using-NFSv4-tp3536513p3536718.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing lis
Sure it does.
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
On May 19, 2011, at 12:04 PM, johneboyer wrote:
> I’m planning to implement the shared file system master slave using NFSv4 on
> Ubuntu (lucid) server. However, my Linux consultant is telling me that it’s
> not going
I have an embedded broker and I want to set specify which cursor to use
and some of the attributes.
When using the activemq.xml file I'm specifying something like;
Can somebody point me to an example or the right place in the javadocs
so that I can specify this information pro
I think that's kinda funny, really. ActiveMQ's website has a warning about
potential problems with locking under NFSv3,
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html and IBM MQ's
similar "multi-instance" mode *requires* NFSv4 for "proper lock handling."
I only briefly teste
I’m planning to implement the shared file system master slave using NFSv4 on
Ubuntu (lucid) server. However, my Linux consultant is telling me that it’s
not going to work and has refused to waste time setting it up because he
says the exclusive locking will not work.
Is he correct? Does anyone hav
5.3.x of ActiveMQ is fairly old and lots of things have been fixed since then
in the current 5.5 version.You should consider upgrading.
In addition, as of 5.4 there is a "rebalanceClusterClients" option you can set
on your transportConnector (in conjunction with "updateClusterClients") tha
It seems activeMQ creates the tables (ACTIVEMQ_ACKS, LOCK, etc) when
it starts up. Can you create the tables manually? Where is the DDL for
that?
I have a local SQL Server 2008 that I want to configure ActiveMQ to
use. My activemq.xml configuration is:
I have a primary and secondary node configured with the failover transport.
When the primary node dies, producers and consumers switch over to the
secondary node just fine. However, when the primary node comes back, only
the producer seems to recover and migrate back to the primary, however the
con
the only difference is in schema validation. Prior to 5.4, the schema
was not validated by default so it was ok to use journaledJDBC which
used a spring factory bean to make the persistence adapter but which
was invalid w.r.t the schema.
With journalPersistenceAdapterFactory you are explicitly usi
Is there any difference between journalPersistenceAdapterFactory and
journaledJDBC?
Or both are only different ways of achieving journaled JDBC persistency?
Below are the configurations.
I am using activeMQ 5.4
no, the journal is not replicated, so any inflight messages, in the
journal but not yet batch replayed to the jdbc store will not be
accessible/visible to the peer broker.
For failover between peer brokers that share a jdbc store, you should
not use a journal.
On 19 May 2011 12:28, chitta wrote:
We have following situation:
ClientServer
Server
ActiveMQ Instance1 ActiveMQ Instance2<
Bridge
NetworkConnector Transport Connector
Hi,
thanks for answering. It works now it fails the slf jar file.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-Bridge-AMQ-Version-5-5-0-tp3532658p3535459.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Does Active MQ support failover using journaled JDBC or not? I am using
activeMQ 5.4.2.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failover-using-journaled-JDBC-tp3535444p3535444.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I just installed and ran Active MQ 5.5 on Windows XP. It ran fine and I was
able to send/receive messages to a newly created queue as anonymous user.
However to bring in security, I tried to use activemq-security.xml. To keep
things simple, I didn't create any environment variable
ACTIVEMQ_ENC
Thanks Gary.
Can you comment on ActiveMQ 4.1.2 also please as we suspect this was not the
case with this old version and still have some customers in production with
4.1.2 ?
Muzza.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-Spec-Application-Server-Facilities-ASF-
All of the ASF optional pieces are present in 5.x, can't help on the
specifics of websphere though.
On 17 May 2011 11:45, muzza wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> Just a quick question for AMQ versions 5.x and 4.1.x.
>
> Does AMQ implement the optional Application Server Facilities in the JMS
> Spec ?
>
>
Hi,
it seems like you're trying to use http transport and for that you need
commons http client (http://hc.apache.org/httpcomponents-client-ga/)
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and messaging - http://fusesource.com
Ac
29 matches
Mail list logo
