Site activemq.apache.org unavailable

Hi All, Currently I cannot open any page on Apache ActiveMQ site: it returns 404 not found. Tried from different locations. Is it ok? -- Best regards, Alexander

Re: Bugfix ARTEMIS-4795 and sending messages to FQQN

Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4911 пн, 8 июл. 2024 г. в 21:22, Justin Bertram : > The issue you describe with the routed message count looks like a bug. Can > you open a Jira? > > > Justin > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 12:43 PM Alexander Milovidov >

Re: Bugfix ARTEMIS-4795 and sending messages to FQQN

he routed > message count will increase. It's not clear from your description exactly > what exactly is happening in your use-case. Is the message not routed to > _any_ binding (e.g. due to filters) and the routed message count is still > increasing? > > > Justin >

Artemis transaction timeout

Hi All, I have a question regarding Artemis transactions. For example, there is a default transaction-timeout (300 seconds), but I cannot figure out in which situations it i

Re: Bugfix ARTEMIS-4795 and sending messages to FQQN

t; not match ? > > Clebert Suconic > > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 8:33 AM Alexander Milovidov > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Recently I upgraded Artemis to 2.35.0 in the test environment and our > > testers complained that they no longer can send messa

Re: Bugfix ARTEMIS-4795 and sending messages to FQQN

ation. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce it in an isolated environment. пт, 5 июл. 2024 г. в 15:32, Alexander Milovidov : > Hi All, > > Recently I upgraded Artemis to 2.35.0 in the test environment and our > testers complained that they no longer can send messages to multicast > queues usi

Bugfix ARTEMIS-4795 and sending messages to FQQN

Hi All, Recently I upgraded Artemis to 2.35.0 in the test environment and our testers complained that they no longer can send messages to multicast queues using FQQN. I have read release notes and found that there was a bug that was fixed in this version. Issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: code=GENERIC_EXCEPTION WARN

I also have a lot of the same error messages in the logs. It began after Artemis was upgraded from version 2.31.2 to 2.32. I think there were errors but it was not logged in the previous version, and it does not affect client connections. It seems that it is caused by old clients which use outdated

Re: Artemis Keycloak integration

ub.com/apache/activemq-artemis-console > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:08 AM Alexander Milovidov > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Has anyone configured Keycloak for ActiveMQ Artemis management console? > > I found that someone wrote in this mailing list about the

Re: Searching in docs

Hi Jan, I also have mentioned that the search field disappeared about half a year ago. Currently I'm using Google with "site:url of the site to search for" added to the search string. ср, 19 июн. 2024 г. в 09:21, Jan Šmucr : > Hello. > Since 2.31, the documentation has been presented in a diff

Re: Artemis Keycloak integration

. 2024 г. в 18:44, Alexander Milovidov : > I tried but did not succeed. I ran the console in the test mode with mvn > jetty:run, and default Artemis instance - both on the same Windows machine. > I could not connect from the new console to Artemis with any IP-address > (localhost or 127.0

Re: Artemis Keycloak integration

asses with "new" operator: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/24.0.4/release_notes/#required-to-be-instantiated-with-the-new-operator ср, 12 июн. 2024 г. в 13:39, Alexander Milovidov : > Interesting, I haven't heard about the new console. I'll definitely try > it. Thanks Justin

Re: Artemis Keycloak integration

; On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 10:08 AM Alexander Milovidov > > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Has anyone configured Keycloak for ActiveMQ Artemis management console? > > I found that someone wrote in this mailing list about the successful > > connection of Artemis v2.20.

Artemis Keycloak integration

Hi All, Has anyone configured Keycloak for ActiveMQ Artemis management console? I found that someone wrote in this mailing list about the successful connection of Artemis v2.20.0 to Keycloak v16.1.1 in Feb 2022. I tried to use an example from the artemis-examples repository (features/standard/sec

Re: Unrouted Message Count and Address Size Metrics

Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 2:36 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: Unrouted Message Count and Address Size Metrics > Alexander, > > Thank you for your reply. Where did you get that description? I did not > see it in the metrics plugin you shared. > > Regards, &

Re: Unrouted Message Count and Address Size Metrics

Hi William, I have configured metrics plugin which works as a Prometheus exporter. Usually every exporter has a small description for each metric, which is available on the /metrics endpoint as # HELP text. Unrouted messages count is the number of messages which were sent to the address and have

Re: Need Help with ActiveMQ Log File Limits!

Hi Paul, I have a similar log4j2 config for ActiveMQ Artemis, and rollover works without any problem. Which version of ActiveMQ are you using? (I'm guessing that it is ActiveMQ Classic, but I'm not sure) ActiveMQ Classic uses Log4j2 only in versions 5.17.1 and later. Older versions use Log4j 1 and

Re: Temporary queue in Artemis active MQ

Hi Naveen, I'm not an expert in ActiveMQ Artemis, and may answer incorrectly, but I have seen some cases when temporary queues are used. Usually there is no need to use management API to create a temporary queue. As it seems to me, the purpose of temporary queues is to be auto-created and auto-del

Re: Performance Testing Artemis ActiveMQ

Hi All, I used JMeter several years ago with IBM MQ and it was configured using JMS with .bindings file (file system JNDI context). InitialContextFactory class used: IBM MQ - com.sun.jndi.fscontext.RefFSContextFactory ActiveMQ - org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory (I did not try

Re: Artemis JMX authorization in broker.xml

Hi Gary, I have configured this method and it works. Thanks! It did not work until I removed the "authorisation" section from management.xml. It seems that I have not correctly understood the documentation: authorization section should be omitted (it means that we have to completely remove it to m

Re: Using LDAPLoginModule with Active Directory

Hi Justin, Thanks for your help. It is a great idea to make several sections for each LDAP server. I will try to configure and test this configuration. Recently I thought that we have to configure some kind of load-balancer for LDAP with an application-level probe which tries to connect to LDAP an

Re: Artemis JMX authorization in broker.xml

Hi Gary, Thanks for your help. I have enabled the connector with port 1099 in the management.xml like it is configured in the smoke-test files (except for the port number 10099), and it did not help. It seems that my configuration looks similar, but I have to check it.

Re: feasibility of connecting ActiveMQ Artemis with IBM MQ

Thanks Justin, Clebert. For some reason I didn't read the whole documentation section about broker connections, and it is an interesting new feature for me. Although we have already configured Camel JMS to move messages between IBM MQ and Artemis, I will try to establish connection between those br

Re: Have Artemis installed, Need advice where to start and how to start using it ... from IBM MQ world

gt; > You're right. I just have to gnaw through the documentation to reach a > point when things become clear by themselves - just as I did with MQSeries > decades earlier. > > Regards, > Ben > > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Milovidov > Sent: Sunday,

Re: Have Artemis installed, Need advice where to start and how to start using it ... from IBM MQ world

Hi Ben, I also worked with IBM MQ for several years. I have started with Artemis from reading the documentation, and continue to check it when something is not clear for me. I think it is also necessary to have some real use cases for Artemis because it is not possible to gain a lot of experience