Re: memoryLimit in wild-carded policyEntry

, but are not based on real JVM stats. Typically, the JVM heap needs to be configured to exceed the broker systemUsage limit by about 30% On 10 November 2010 22:18, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.com wrote: Suppose I have topics a.1, a.2, a.3, ..., a.N and I configure my broker's

memoryLimit in wild-carded policyEntry

of the N topics? Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Non-persistent publishing to topics

5.3.1 but we'll probably upgrade to 5.4 soon so I am happy to take recommendations specific to 5.4. Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Message-Level Authorization between brokers?

studying the BrokerFilter interface which seems promising, but I'd appreciate it if anyone can save me some time by telling me either that 1) no, BrokerFilter can't do this, or 2) yes, BrokerFilter can, and then give short outline of how to do it. Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Re: Message-Level Authorization between brokers?

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.comwrote: Can a BrokerFilter be used to message-level authorization of messages sent from one broker to another in a network of brokers? Suppose you have a hub and spoke architecture, where there may be many 'spoke brokers

Re: Broker to Broker authentication using JAAS fails

. On 21 May 2010 06:24, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.com wrote: I'm not able to establish a network connection between two brokers via an SSL transport when I turn on JAAS certificate authentication. I want to do this with a hub spoke architecture, where one broker is the hub

Re: Broker to Broker authentication using JAAS fails

transport.closeAsync=falseamp;wantClientAuth=true, only needClientAuth=true. Anyway, I am past a major hurdle here and hopefully the remaining pieces will be easy. :) Thanks again, Jim On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.comwrote: James, Are you sure this should is fixed

Re: Fully programmatic authorization map

- http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.com wrote: I'd like to implement an authorization plugin that would allow me to implement a fully

Broker to Broker authentication using JAAS fails

. Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong? FYI I have turned on ssl debug and seen the SSL handshakes in the log. Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Re: Fully programmatic authorization map

for both authentication and authorization. Thanks, Jim Lloyd On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Jim Newsham jnews...@referentia.comwrote: I'm running activemq embedded within our app, and configuring it programmatically (rather than using xml files). Here is how I configure the authorization plugin

Fully programmatic authorization map

a high level outline of how I would implement this? Thanks, Jim Lloyd Silver Tail Systems

admin console does not show duplex connections

I am using a network of brokers with a hub and spoke architecture. I expected to be able to look at http://myhub:8161/admin/connections.jsp and see the connections from the 'spokes'. And in fact, I believe I have seen these connections in the past. I recently changed my configuration so that the

Re: Configuring SSL in a network of brokers

and passwords for key and trust stores. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Jim Lloyd jll

Configuring SSL in a network of brokers

did this to our configuration, and I can't find where it might have been done for us in the default configuration. So, all this boils down to the simple question: how does activemq-demo.xml work? Where is client.ks and client.ts configured for this demo? Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Re: Compression on network connections

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 08:55 -0700, Jim Lloyd wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Bruce Snyder bruce.sny...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.com wrote

Compression on network connections

is trueby default. Is that still the default with ActiveMQ 5? Thanks, Jim Lloyd Silver Tail Systems

Upgrading from activemq-cpp 2.2 to 3.1

I'm finally upgrading some applications to use activemq-cpp 3.1.1. We had been using 2.2.6

Re: Upgrading from activemq-cpp 2.2 to 3.1

in upgrading from 2.x to 3.x, but if there is I haven't been able to find it. Is there one? Jim On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 14:27 -0800, Jim Lloyd wrote: I'm finally upgrading some applications to use activemq-cpp 3.1.1. We had

Re: Single consumer for multiple brokers?

I'm interested in a variation of this for load balancing. Assume the volume of data coming from publishers is very large, and you need N brokers (think N is 10 or more). Furthermore, you want N+1 or N+2 redundancy so that if any 1 or 2 brokers die, there is sufficient capacity to continue handling

Re: Race condition with transport listener and failover transports??

Thanks Gary. That's works for me. :) On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote: appended a little comment to the doc to use ActiveMQConnectionFactory.setTransportListener(). Thanks :-) 2008/12/21 Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.com: To answer my own

Re: Race condition with transport listener and failover transports??

the warning at the bottom of the failover-transport-referencehttp://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.htmlpage. Jim Lloyd On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Jim Lloyd jll...@silvertailsystems.comwrote: We're building a client library to install into our customer's applications

Race condition with transport listener and failover transports??

race conditions. Or am I missing some other solution? Thanks, Jim Lloyd

Handling of slow consumers

) such the only the slow consumer is penalized -- the discard messages for the slow consumer option. I'm willing to accept that the broker will discard more messages than necessary. For our applications, this is far preferable to slowing down any producers. Thanks, Jim Lloyd Silver Tail Systems

Specifying configuration via options on URIs

The ability to specify configuration options via parameters on URIs is very cool. But I also find it troubling. It appears to me that if there is a typo in my URI, there is no indication that the parameter was unrecognized and therefore ignored. Closely related, in the admin console, clicking on

Re: Tips for multiple versions of APR?

To answer my own questions: All three components (apr, apr-util, and activemq-cpp) seem to build fine when configured with --disable-shared. I'm able to build and run my test apps against the static libraries. On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Jim Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I think

High throughput non-persistent pub/sub, and problems with ActiveMQ-CPP 2.2.2

? Suppose a system is allowed to have only two nines (99.0%) SLA (measure monthly) for message delivery if that is required to achieve high stability? Can the broker be configured such that it will never deadlock even if a consumer deadlocks? Thanks, Jim Lloyd Principal Architect Silver Tail Systems Inc.

Re: High throughput non-persistent pub/sub, and problems with ActiveMQ-CPP 2.2.2

new that we haven't seen yet. Obviously if you can come up with some samples that can lock up the client those would be invaluable in finding the root cause. Regards Tim On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 11:55 -0800, Jim Lloyd wrote: Hello, I have experience with very high volume pub/sub using

Tips for multiple versions of APR?

than I had seen it so far. Thanks, Jim Lloyd