our applications.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NikheelRanjan [mailto:nikheel.ran...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:05 AM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blueprint(Spring) DSL vs JAVA DSL
>
> I also have good amount of experience in IT and I a
We are using XML DSL and xslt for transformation.
We don't see any issue so far for any of our applications.
-Original Message-
From: NikheelRanjan [mailto:nikheel.ran...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:05 AM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Blueprint(Spring) DSL vs
> processors in between to handle complex tasks as a challenge in handling
> big
> applications and do you think that JAVA DSL has any advantage over it?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp57818
tp://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807p5781956.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807p5781956.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ints as we have two groups in teams where one group is
> supporting java DSL other is SPRING based one.
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spri
never requires recompilation and can be easily
> >>> understood by any person who understands the basics of xml.
> >>> 4.At runtime its all on camel based components irrespective of java
> DSL or
> >>> spring DSL.
> >>>
> >>> My concerns:
java DSL or
>>> spring DSL.
>>>
>>> My concerns:
>>> Does using xmls/spring DSLs really give you any maintenance problems? Does
>>> choice of DSL really matter or it just depends upon the
>>> developers/technical
>>> team's capa
s supporting java DSL other is
SPRING based one.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in teams where one group is supporting java DSL other is
> SPRING based one.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
up is supporting java DSL other is
SPRING based one.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Blueprint-Spring-DSL-vs-JAVA-DSL-tp5781807.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey Robert.
I've been using the pure java dsl for a while now and have not yet found
a situation that did not work (of course I don't know the details of what
you are trying to do so take my experience with a grain of salt).
-Tim
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Robert J. Liguori wrote:
> Is
oops sry 1 caveat. There's a feature in camel of autodetecting your routes
and also of auto injecting your camelcontext.
This feature requires spring's context scanning which ATM is not quite
available in java and can only be done using spring xml.
I think it's something they fixed (are fixing) in
Well, I use a combination of DelegateProcessors and dynamically-built
Pipelines to modify my routes at runtime; this kind of requires Java
DSL. But I suppose the initial construction of the route using the
DelegateProcessor could be done in Spring.
Don
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Robert J.
Is it fair to say that *any* route can be written in Spring DSL or
Java DSL, which will ultimately have the same effect?
Or is this not the case?
Thanks, Robert
15 matches
Mail list logo
