On 16-Nov-2013, at 7:52 pm, 5度倾斜 <465296...@qq.com> wrote:
> thank you for your suggestion :D
> I made CloudStack4.2.0 started successfully, by install a 64-bit Ubuntu
> server OS rather than the old 32-bit one.
> Reboot can't solve the problem,i've tried many times,and i still don't know
> the
Hi all,
Have you ever met the problem that fail to commuicate with user_vm througth
web UI(browser),and the error message is "Server Internal Error".Please
give me some clues.
Best regards,
Frank
Hi all,
I meet a strange problem that my virtual router can access Internet and my
user_vm can access virtual router but my user_vm can't access Internet.Is
there anyone can provide with some suggestions?Thanks!
---
Best regards,
Frank
Which version of cloudstack are you using ?
Is it isolated network ?
Did you add egress rules on your network to allow outgoing guest traffic ?
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 17-Nov-2013, at 4:32 PM, Du Jun
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I meet a strange problem that my virtual router can access Internet and my
> use
Hi Jayapal,
Thank you for your prompt reply,your advice is very useful to me.The
network strategy in Cloudstack4.2 is a bit different from cloudstack4.0's
and I have add firewall rule to Egress rules in my isolated guest
network.My vm can access Internet now.
--
Best regards,
Frank
2
Hi Jayapal,
By the way,I think cloudstack4.2 CPVM does support lXC very well.How do you
like?
---
Best regards,
Frank
2013/11/17 Du Jun
> Hi Jayapal,
> Thank you for your prompt reply,your advice is very useful to me.The
> network strategy in Cloudstack4.2 is a bit different from c
Yes, I've disabled the firewall on both KVM hosts in question and still no
dice. I can't even ping the VR from my guest VM, but when I set the eth0
device on the guest to static everything works fine, which makes no sense
at all to me. Simply setting the NIC to static allows me see the VR.
Switchin
The 64 bit requirement on the host I believe is a hw requirement not a
hypervisor os. Eg XenServer is 32 bit (at least up to 6.1).
> On Nov 17, 2013, at 2:09 AM, Shanker Balan
> wrote:
>
>> On 16-Nov-2013, at 7:52 pm, 5度倾斜 <465296...@qq.com> wrote:
>>
>> thank you for your suggestion :D
>> I
On 17-Nov-2013, at 8:56 pm, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> The 64 bit requirement on the host I believe is a hw requirement not a
> hypervisor os.
> Eg XenServer is 32 bit (at least up to 6.1).
>
XenServer hypervisor is 64bit. The control domain (dom0) which you ssh into is
32bit.
--
@shankerbala
Adam,
I suggest loggin in to the VR and running tcpdump to check if you are receiving
the dhcp requests. If guest vms can talk to each other and the vr responsible
for dhcp is on the same network I do not see a reason for not getting the
lease.
the default fw setting should allow connectio
So the management server should work just fine with 32 bit - but if
you are using pre-compiled binaries from the yum/apt repos, we only
build for 64 bit. You could certainly build this for yourself, but not
sure there's a lot of reason to.
--David
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, 5度倾斜 <465296...@
So having seen this specific problem scores of times, it's almost
always network config related. Several potential problems to look out
for:
1. Another DHCP server on the same network. (There are ways of
mitigating this, but for the time being, lets just say that
CloudStack's VR should be the only
The question is (at least in my mind) do you want the deployment to
fail (appropriately) or to 'work' from the end user perspective, even
if it doesn't follow your way of getting things done perfectly.
Before we dig into it, you could create template names or descriptions
with hints to help folks
Hi Eric:
So the folks at TrendMicro have done some work around client-focused
crypto of volumes in CloudStack.
CloudStack itself doesn't have object storage (we consume object
storage, but don't write software to provide object storage - plenty
of good projects that do; Ceph, RiakCS, OpenStack Sw
Why don¹t you create a portal and allow to end users choose their
requirements and send it to ACS via API , then you can achieve what you
want
Maybe its not it ACS but Citrix also provide another software which is
cloud portal business manager which is do everything for you, you can
bundle related
yep,i found finally,Thanks,handsome.
于 2013/11/14 13:44, Min Chen 写道:
> That is because the one stored in sql DB is already encrypted due to
> security reason. When you deploy CS through source code, encryption is
> turned off, so you are seeing them match.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 11/13/13 6:04
Good evening everyone. I'm presenting at Collab this week on hypervisor
selection in CloudStack. While I've been running CloudStack since the
pre-Apache days, my experience is obviously limited to what I've personally
implemented. Since I want to keep this session factual and avoid any bias,
I'm
On 18-Nov-2013, at 12:53 am, David Nalley wrote:
> So the management server should work just fine with 32 bit - but if
> you are using pre-compiled binaries from the yum/apt repos, we only
> build for 64 bit. You could certainly build this for yourself, but not
> sure there's a lot of reason to.
hello,everyone!
I got a windows8 32bit iso,and want to try it on my VM created by Cloudstack
4.2.0,and hypervisor is KVM.
Firstly,windows logo shows :D,then display a black backgroud with lines of
error.Error code is 0x005D.I google it,somebody say KVM just cant install
32bit win8,and 64bit
I think so,cloudstack.org gives 32bit packages,that means 32bit management
server should work on 32bit OS.
I truely got the package via 'apt-get',maybe i got a 64bit managementserver and
install it on a 32bit OS.so that's the root problem.
your words are helpful,thank you so much!
---
20 matches
Mail list logo