随便找个服务器把盘阵格了，挂成nfs然后public给cloudstack即可
在 2013年12月5日上午9:30，leifan8440 leifan8...@gmail.com写道：
要用到集群文件系统，比如GFS2、CLVM之类的，需要自己配置
http://www.cloudstack-china.org/2013/10/2629.html
leifan8440
发件人： 赵涛
发送时间： 2013-12-05 09:26
收件人： users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
主题： FC怎样实现作为KVM的主存储
也可以用过CLVM实现
sharemount方式的话你必须配置一个共享存储协议，比如gfs2
在 2013年12月5日上午9:26，赵涛 zhaotao...@qq.com写道：
FC怎样实现作为KVM的主存储，在官方文档只看到可通过sharemount方式实现。请问应该怎么操作？
Before all, thank you for your reply. You explain me many concepts, really
important to know, that were not clear in CS documentation.
In total there are 4 NIC on each server, 2 assigned to vSwitch0 and 2 to
vSwitch1.
In according of what you replied, my new zone configuration will be:
1
Jake,
If it's simply the Secondary Storage which is at alert state, then follow these
steps to resolve (its effectively a bug)
http://dave.ie/cloudstack-secondarystorage-alarm-on-dashboard/
However if it's your SSVM that is at alert state, the simple thing to do is
destroy it and let the
Envoyé avec AquaMail pour Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Le 3 décembre 2013 04:34:04 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com a écrit :
Hi but i did not select security groups in the zone wizard, how can i do
this now or do i have to recreate the zone? I found issue with no
resolution exactly
Envoyé avec AquaMail pour Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
Le 3 décembre 2013 04:34:04 Amin Samir aminsamira...@hotmail.com a écrit :
Hi but i did not select security groups in the zone wizard, how can i do
this now or do i have to recreate the zone? I found issue with no
resolution exactly
Hi,
I would like to understand what kind of disaster recovery options are provided
by CloudStack in case of VM or host failures (e.g. can it do failovers from a
host to another? from a zone to another?)
Thank you,
Octavian
Octavian,
CloudStack provides VM HA enabling VMs to fail-over to alternate Hosts within
the same Cluster so long as the VM is using Shared Storage.
For XenServer and KVM, CloudStack initiates the HA failover when it detects a
Host has gone down. For VMware, vCenter handles the HA event.
On 04-Dec-2013, at 1:35 pm, Domenico De Monte d.demo...@netsons.com wrote:
Before all, thank you for your reply. You explain me many concepts, really
important to know, that were not clear in CS documentation.
There are four traffic types in CloudStack:
(1) Management
(2) Storage
(3) Guest
On 04-Dec-2013, at 1:24 pm, Shanker Balan shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Helo,
My Advanced Zone itself has security groups disabled. I have enabled
the SecurityGroupsProvider and created a SharedNetwork with
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService offering.
With this, I am now able
Hi Geoff,
Thanks, are there any specific features or options in regards to pure DR,
rather than HA? For instance, moving VMs between clusters, pods or zones?
Octavian
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 04 December 2013 11:36
To:
Octavian,
Your Compute Offering needs to be flagged as HA Enabled, this will then ensure
that the VM will move to a new Host in the event of a Host failure. (FYI if
you put a Host into Maintenance Mode, all VMs are migrated, regardless of their
HA status)
To move VMs between Clusters, you
Hi Octavian,
In addition there is a lot of redundancy built into the Virtual Router.
Good explanation available here
http://blogs.clogeny.com/understanding-the-redundant-virtual-router-in-citri
x-cloudplatform/
These articles provide pretty good overview of High Availability in
CloudStack:
I did confirm that the template does exist in the directory.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:05 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
Can you make sure that the template with which you are trying to deploy a VM
is present on the secondary Storage inside 244 directory?
On 04.12.2013 07:54, Shanker Balan wrote:
Helo,
My Advanced Zone itself has security groups disabled. I have enabled
the SecurityGroupsProvider and created a SharedNetwork with
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService offering.
With this, I am now able to create a new VM in the shared network
On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, 13:26:07, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.12.2013 07:54, Shanker Balan wrote:
Helo,
My Advanced Zone itself has security groups disabled. I have enabled
the SecurityGroupsProvider and created a SharedNetwork with
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService
Hi!
I have one problem with CloudStack.
When I add a volume, nothing error appears.
But when I add a instance, the server can't add a volume.
The Log is in the attachment.
--The Zone isn't configure with local storage-Save.
Primary- and Secondary-Storage is on the management-Server.
The
On 04-Dec-2013, at 6:54 pm, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 04.12.2013 07:54, Shanker Balan wrote:
Helo,
My Advanced Zone itself has security groups disabled. I have enabled
the SecurityGroupsProvider and created a SharedNetwork with
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService offering.
With
On 04-Dec-2013, at 8:24 pm, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Radek is correct, you cannot use the
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService in a 'standard' advanced Zone, only
one which had Security Groups enabled when it was created
FWIW, it works over here with
Radek is correct, you cannot use the DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService
in a 'standard' advanced Zone, only one which had Security Groups enabled when
it was created
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
I'm experiencing problems in Cloudstack 4.2 installation on both Ubuntu
Server 12.04 and 13.10.
- Installed Cloudstack Management Controller and a KVM host in two
separate boxes
- Cloudstack installations went fine
- Created a basic networking zone, all is green, storage ok, vvms ok
Hello,
I am attempting to use the cloudstack API to get user-data for my VMs.
I am creating the VMs with the puppet cloudstack-resources module, and it
seems to populate it (From the cloudstack GUI, under Group I see my data)
However, when I do a
wget http://router/latest/user-data
I get back
Hi Derek:
Glad that the puppet resources are useful.
Setting user-data is different than setting group:
Look at the options here:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.2/user/deployVirtualMachine.html
--David
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Derek Cole derek.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to somehow make the traffic for a bunch of real
servers go through Cloudstack? My crazy idea is to control the firewall
for those servers from cloudstack's security groups.
Does this make any sense, could it be done in a semi-elegant way?
Lucian
--
Sent from the
Hi Derek
When you use user-data, you have to provide user-data and deliver it
to virtual router. Unfortunately, CloudStack only provides REST API to
deliver user-data to virtual router now. This API is
deployVirtualMachine that creates instance and set instance specific
data.
For example, I
Hrmm - Maybe I am not being exactly clear.
I originally started out trying to use puppet to not only configure my VMs,
but provision them in the cloud as well. I started out with a template in
cloudstack, and have been using cloudstack_resources to create new VMs
automatically when my puppet
What you want to do should work.
Not familiar with cloudstack_resources. Does it have a means to set user data
when creating an instance? If so, have you checked the user data manually (ie
querying the vr/dhcp server) to see that it was set?
On Dec 4, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Derek Cole
--The Zone isn’t configure with “local storage”-Save.
Primary- and Secondary-Storage is on the management-Server.
How is configured your primary storage? Is it shared mount-point? This could be
misleading for the mgmt server and that's why you see that local storage is not
available.
FWIW, it works over here with the DB hack. :)
Interesting, have you destroyed and re-created VR after you made a db hack?
- Radoslaw Smigielski
We're seeing a bug where cloudstack tries to spool a template from any
secondary storage in any zone in a region to primary storage.
DB selects show a rand() at the end, it took a few attempts to get the template
onto primary storage.
Must be a bug.
On 4 Dec 2013, at 13:23, John Skinner
Sean - I can confirm from the code that what you have seen is a valid bug.
But should be a problem only for templates occurring in multiple zones.
Would you mind filing a bug for this please ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 04/12/13 1:44 PM, Sean Hamilton s...@seanhamilton.co.uk wrote:
We're seeing a bug
After importing a VHD (centos 6.4) as a template into CS4.2 (The vhd was
running previously on a CS4.0 cloud), running into the following issue when
attempting to deploy it as a small instance:
2013-12-04 23:18:18,637 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl]
Adam,
Is the VR running for the network you are trying to connect the VM to? I often
see VMs failing to start when it's actually the VR failing to start which is
the real cause of the issue.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603 0542tel:+442036030542 | S: +44 20
Hi Geoff thank you for your response.
Fortunately (or contextually unfortunately =) ) it is running.
Currently the advanced setup has 4 different VLAN tagged and this particular
VHD will for test purposes connect to one.
Hmm, after another attempt I've received:
2013-12-04 23:34:31,699 INFO
Well I started to post about getting something broken. I modified
cloudstack_resources to take an argument for userdata. I was getting all
kinds of issues with that, until I realized that the argument in userdata
has to be base64 encoded. I fixed that, and now my VMs can get their
metadata! I had
Yeah - it's definitely a work in progress - if you look at Dan Bode's
cloudstack_resources, he actually has a ton of additional work in a
different branch that hasn't yet been validated. It's on my list to
get around to that in the next few weeks. What you likely saw (esp if
it was my
On 05-Dec-2013, at 4:47 am, Adam Harvey ahar...@enmasse.com wrote:
2013-12-04 23:13:44,097 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] (DirectAgent-119:null)
Looking for scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/xenserver60/patch in the classpath
2013-12-04 23:13:44,097 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
On 05-Dec-2013, at 3:06 am, Radek Smigielski radek.smigiel...@ymail.com wrote:
FWIW, it works over here with the DB hack. :)
Interesting, have you destroyed and re-created VR after you made a db hack?
Not yet.
I just redid the setup with Advanced Zone + Security Groups enabled.
I don’t really
I will see what I can do. I dont have a github presently, but since I am
mostly working with FreeBSD I had to fix puppet's service resource, jason
hancocks section that look for dhcp leases and a couple of other things.
The userdata fix I put in seems to be working, though not when the puppet
Hi,
Create another network offering with dhcp,dns and userdata service and undate
the shared network with these offerings. While doing the network update choose
not to change the network cidr.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Hi,
Make sure that iptable rules are configured properly for icmp and ssh traffic
on kvm host.
I think icmp is disabled by default on SSVM and CPVM on control IP address, but
should be allowed on public IP address.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Francesco Maria Magnini
I've been trying to get an new install of CloudStack 4.2 working with a Vsphere
cluster. I've went through creating my zone with advanced networking. I can see
the system VMs but they are not started. The secondary storage vm seems to keep
appearing and disappearing however. When I look in
If it were only that way with these for me. They're completely stock I am at a
loss of why this is occurring.
-Original Message-
From: Shanker Balan [mailto:shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 8:05 PM
To: CloudStack-Users
Subject: Re: xenserver 6.2 added to
Folks,
I am working on installing a new 4.2.1 CS installation and I believe
I've taken care of all the prerequisites, however I am unable to start
my system vms and proceed with bringing up my cloud.
Below is output from my management-server.log
Can anyone lend a hand and let me know what
This seemed to be a problem:
Host name:
slcai547.us.oracle.com, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and
trying other available hosts
Your host is in avoid set an CS cannot find a hypervisor host to deploy SSVM.
Now the question is why the host is in avoid set? Log you posted doesn't
Hi,
From the below logs the host is in avoid set.
Can you please check host status for up, try restarting MS server.
2013-12-04 23:36:07,519 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator]
(secstorage-1:FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name:
slcai547.us.oracle.comhttp://slcai547.us.oracle.com/,
What does avoid set mean?
I've restarted both the cloudstack-management on the mgtm server along
with cloudstakc-agent on the kvm host, both to no avail.
This is a fairly clean installation using bits from
baseurl=http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/
This is on OEL 6.4
Any additional
47 matches
Mail list logo
