在cloudstack4.2中发现，在高级网络中创建vpn server，只能使用源地址创建vpn server，获取出来的公共IP创建出的VPN
server 无法使用。
在虚拟路由器中抓包看见使用获取的公网IP创建的VPN，vpn客户端连接时候返回的数据包是由源地址（虚拟路由器公网IP）发出，可能是这个原因导致的。
From: wilc...@hotmail.com
To: users-cn@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 网络中配置vpn，无法连接
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:54:23 +
您好：
可能是cloudstack 对IE支持不好，你试一下，其它浏兰器，比如：FIREFOX。
cloudstackfqa2013
发件人： 卢惠勇
发送时间： 2013-12-19 14:28
收件人： users-cn
主题： Re: 无法使用控制台的Ctrl-Alt-Del按钮
看看console-proxy系统虚拟机正常吗
在 2013年12月19日 下午1:57，刘蒙恩 3...@3mn.net写道：
看你的描述貌似是个bug。。。
在 2013年12月19日 下午1:51，王磊 wang...@smartdot.com写道：
Hello,
I have CloudStack 4.2.0 on ubuntu 12.04 with KVM hypervisor. The router VMs
failed to start. Two system VMs work fine. When the router VM failed to start,
there are entries like the following in management-server.log:
2013-12-18 22:49:48,076 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
Hello guys,
Could some one tell me how to change the IP address of a guest vm? It has been
assigned by default by dhcp router and I would like to change it. I know how to
create a new vm with a specified IP address using cloudmonkey, but I couldn't
find a way of changing the IP for the
Hi,
If your VM is in isolated network please do the following
1. edit the nics table ip4_address column for your instance_id to new ip.
2. login to the router corresponds to the network and replace old ip with new
ip in below files.
a. /var/lib/misc/dnsmasq.leases
b. /etc/dhcphosts.txt
3.
Do you know if there is an easier way? Like via the api calls or the
cloudmonkey command? Or is it currently the only way?
- Original Message -
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 19
Hi,
There is a thread on the developer list about new documentation format:
http://markmail.org/thread/kjktabmbbrvo6qfy
There is a prototype for new documentation format and delivery at:
http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
The aim is to make it easier for everyone to edit and write new
Hi,
There is no other way to change the ip.
If you want specific IP for the VM, you can get secondary ip in vm NICs page
and configure it on the VM.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 19-Dec-2013, at 3:58 PM, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Do you know if there is an easier way? Like via the
Hello,
on *Basic *Network types the IP is assigned only after VM start first time
but
on *Advanced *Network types the IP is assigned immediatly after vm
deploy and before before VM start first time.
Is there a way to make Advanced work like Basic (IP will be assigned
only after VM start)?
Antonio
This behaviour is because of the differences between Basic and Advanced
Networking.
In a Basic Zone, the IP is determined by the POD the VM gets assigned to, but
this assignment only happens when it is started for the first time.
With an Advanced Network, the IP is assigned from the
Greetings !
I have enabled the Dynamic Scaling of CPU and RAM option in the
CloudStack-4.2 deployment. While scaling up the resources of a particular
VM we're encountering the following exception,
ERROR [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-1:job-113 = [
Thanks a lot...
i know this, but my goal is to assign the ip afterwards, to allow users
have deployed and not started VM.
With this configuration i assign an IP for every deployed VM, even if
they are never turned on!
Are there other ways?
Thanks.
Regards.
Il 19/12/2013 12:51, Geoff
Antonio,
Not sure why it's a problem having the IP assigned in an isolated network, can
you elaborate why you don't like this.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Antonio
Andrei,
You could use the addNicToVirtualMachine API command (assuming you are running
4.1 or 4.2)
1. Assign the VM a new 'temp' NIC on an alternate network
2. Set this new NIC to default
3. Remove original NIC
4. Assign a NIC on the original Network, but also set the required IP (hence
using
Antonio,
I guess the bit I can't understand is why is it a problem to have an IP
allocated.
Guest IPs in an Advanced Zone are unique to their CIDR, are behind their
Virtual Router, take up no resources, and do not cost anything in real terms.
I can only guess that you are using a Shared
Geoff,
Thanks for your reply. This is the first route i tried to take, but it didn't
work for me. When I tried to remove the NIC from the guest i had an error
message complaining that the network offering does not have dhcp service or
something like that. I did not take a note of the actual
Yes,
exactly...we have a limited supply of Public IPs.
Thanks a lot!
Il 19/12/2013 15:07, Geoff Higginbottom ha scritto:
Antonio,
I guess the bit I can't understand is why is it a problem to have an IP
allocated.
Guest IPs in an Advanced Zone are unique to their CIDR, are behind their
Andrei,
The QuickCloudNoService Network Offering provides no DHCP, or any other
services (clues in the name) so it's not really a bug as the add / remove NIC
features require DHCP to be enabled on the Network.
I have tested this procedure using the default
Due to the bug, you are unable to remove netowrk from VM, if that network's
network offering does not have DHCP as the service.
And you will not be possible to delete such VMs, that are connected to the
netowrk without DHCP service in it's offering.
This is 4.2 bug...
On 19 December 2013 15:36,
So if i understand correctly:
if we create a vm with offering network WITHOUT dhcp ( like
QuickCloudNoService ) and we want terminate it, we can not
because there is a bug that NEED to remove dhcp service from
virtual nic assigned to this
Hi ,
Well I found the Way to resolve this Problem :).
You have to update vmware traffic label with the VLAN number.
Thank you for Help.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:03 PM, tawfiq zidi tawfiq.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for Replying.
I'm using Vmware Esxi 5.0 with vCenter in my
In my case i have to update
also vlan table on CS database because after few minutes/hours,
CS update again VMware port group to original vlan_id.
Regards
Il 19/12/2013 16:17, tawfiq zidi ha
scritto:
Hi
My workarround is to wait for 4.2.1, and have bunch of VMs that can not
be deleted, just waisting my disk space...
And yes, that is true, the logs you sent, I have that very issue.
Bug here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4828
Andrija
On 19 December 2013 16:14, Domenico De
Geoff, that's right, there is not dhcp service, as the error message has
suggested. However, when I've added the network with the offering
QuickCloudNoService it has assigned a random IP address from the public IP
range that I've specified. It hasn't assigned it through dhcp. I think it
picked
Ah, I see, so I am not going mad, it is actually a known issue ))
Anyway, I should probably wait for 4.3 to be out as 4.2.1 is still utterly
broken when it comes to S3 Secondary storage which is what i am after.
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
We try to fix like this:
1) Destroy vm with NIC collected to QuickCloudNoService. Of
course we will see expunging errors.
2) Change network_id in vm_instance mysql table to a guest
network with associated a DHCP service.
3) Let CS destroy
Hi guys,
I cannot ping internet from VMs.
Pinging from Virtual Router is ok.
In addition, SSVM are reachable from outside (storage/proxy ssvm) through
addresses configured in public network range, Virtual router is not
reachable (but can ping internet).
Any idea?
--
“I videogiochi non
Francesco,
Have you enabled egress rules to allow outbound traffic for guest VMs
If you are trying to ping the public IP of the VR it will not respond due to
security settings, however the SSVM and CPVM do respond.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3603
Demenico,I've followed your suggestion but had some difficulties:
2) Change network_id in vm_instance mysql table to a guest
network with associated a DHCP service.Table vm_instance doesn't have the column network_idAlso, when trying to follow step 4 i have the following
I apologize for the delay in responding to this.
This is what I have found in my research and testing.
The table in question is keystore. The table has a few fields (id, name,
certificate, key, domain_suffix, seq).
1. The id field seems to be just a numerical identifier for the entry,
Update-
Vm's instantiated from template set with Virtio disk/nic actually do not
carry those configuration settings from template to instance.
How do I maintain my virtio disk/nic settings from template to instances?
Appreciate the advice.
Thanks
-jason
Hey Folks,
Is there a way to change
Hi,
Is it possible to assign a specific public ip address to a guest network with
VR from the default network offering?
Thanks
Andrei
Hi Geoff,
I've added a permit all egress rule (source 0.0.0.0/0 ALL) and now guest
VMs can connect to Internet.
Is it normal that the Virtual Router is still not reachable through the
public network?
I cannot ping its public IP address (other 2 public SSVM are pingables).
Regards
On Thu, Dec
Francesco,
I believe you need to add a firewall rule to allow ingress ICMP traffic. Once
allowed you should be able to ping it.
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Francesco Maria Magnini fmm1...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 19 December, 2013 11:23:37
Hi All,
In the last month I had successfully deployed cloudstack 4.0.2 on 2
physical machines (one was VT enabled ubuntu host and other was ubuntu
management server ).
Can anyone please tell me, whether it possible to deploy cloudstack on 2
virtual machines?
Thanks,
Jitendra
On 19-Dec-2013, at 6:44 pm, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
From cloustack we need to specify whether Xenserver tools got installed on
the template. while registering a template we see a checkbox “IsDynamic”,
this represents whether tools installed or not.
Hi Jitendra,
Im running cloudstack management servers and cloudstack database servers as
VMs. 2 VM for management and 2 VMs for database. Database VM(s) are HA mysql
cluster. Management VM - just behind loadbalancer. Of cause that VMs are not
controlled by cloudstack, in my case they are
[Moving dev@ to BCC]
Comments inline.
On 20-Dec-2013, at 9:27 am, jitendra shelar jitendra.shelar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
In the last month I had successfully deployed cloudstack 4.0.2 on 2
physical machines (one was VT enabled ubuntu host and other was ubuntu
management server ).
Hi
It also failed for me!
CloudStack 4.2.0 + XenServer 6.2 VMware ESXi 5.0.
I did configure enable.dynamic.scale.vm = true, and install
XenServer/VMware Tools in the VM templates.
I also checked Dynamically Scalable option in registering templates.
On the XenServer side, I followed the instructions
By the way, I remember seeing this kind of error message, too.
Cannot scale up the vm because of memory constraint violation:
0 = memory-static-min = memory-dynamic-min = memory-dynamic-max =
memory-static-max
For 4.3 development purposes, I have been running the CloudStack Management
Server in Ubuntu 12.04 in a VM on ESX. I've also got a XenServer host
running in another VM on this same ESX host. When I want to run CloudStack
with ESX, I run another VM with ESX on top of the same ESX host.
ESX
On 20-Dec-2013, at 11:13 am, Ryan Lei ryan...@cht.com.tw wrote:
By the way, I remember seeing this kind of error message, too.
Cannot scale up the vm because of memory constraint violation:
0 = memory-static-min = memory-dynamic-min = memory-dynamic-max =
memory-static-max
Let me RTFM
Thanks Shankar, Dan and Mike for your help.
Regards,
Jitendra
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 5:45 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
For 4.3 development purposes, I have been running the CloudStack Management
Server in Ubuntu 12.04 in a VM on ESX. I've also got a XenServer host
I can't add a nfs primary storage for my *lxc* cluster.
this is the cloudstack error log:
INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-10:) *Failed to delete storage
pool on host*
but i can add nfs primary storage for my kvm cluster.why?
--
44 matches
Mail list logo
