Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 > @weizhouapache -- All VMs facing same issue . @yashi4engg can you check if all packages (management, agent) and systemvm template have all been upgraded to 4.19.0 ?

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @weizhouapache -- I tried that but still not working and getting same error. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-9278687

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 > @weizhouapache -- I tried that but still not working and getting same error. @yashi4engg do all vms have the same issue ? or only a specific vm ? GitHub link:

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @weizhouapache -- All VMs facing same issue . GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-9278689 This is an automatically sent

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 > @weizhouapache WE have enabled FIPS for hosts and cloudstack and then it > started giving VNc console errors. Each cloudstack VM has a VNC password. unfortunately it is

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 FIPS isn't a support config yet I think @yashi4engg cc @weizhouapache can advise. GitHub link:

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 All packages for 4.19 as this is new setup with 4.19 . KVM hypervisors with OEL8.9. mysql is ssl enabled. GitHub link:

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 can you destroy CPVM and retry ? @yashi4engg GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9021#discussioncomment-9278686 This is an automatically

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x same as https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8851 - looks like kvm setup issue. GitHub link:

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @yashi4engg could you share the cloudstack and hypervisor type and version where this issue is observed? GitHub link:

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @Gunseerat can you check whether you have selected the hypervisor type as KVM while adding cluster and host? GitHub link:

Re: [D] VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 [cloudstack]

GitHub user yashi4engg added a comment to the discussion: VM Console not working for noVNC using cloudstack UI 4.19.0 @rajujith -- cloudstack version 4.19 , Hypervisor - KVM with OEL8 , We have mysql and cloudstack mgmt installed on same node where mysql is ssl enabled. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x > @rajujith yes sir the hypervisor is kvm selected while creating host > @weizhouapache I have added all permissions in sudoers file also @Gunseerat and

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user Gunseerat added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @rajujith yes sir the hypervisor is kvm selected while creating host @weizhouapache I have added all permissions in sudoers file also GitHub link:

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user printfdebugging added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I was getting the same error. Turns out that reading the log files helps, as a log file is cloudstack's way of communicating back what's the issue. I searched for "server

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user Gunseerat added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x I do not understand what server resources is it referencing to... GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9020#discussioncomment-9278657

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://x.x.x.x @Gunseerat do you use a non-root user ? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9020#discussioncomment-9278655 This is an

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user KobesM added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I did some further investigation and it seems I do not have to add the user to the wheel group. If I add the host for the first time I receive the error: ``` Error 530 Unable to add

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources > I solved the issue by adding the user I used to connect to the KVM host to > the wheel group. I do not know if this is actually required since it is not > documented as

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user KobesM added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources I solved the issue by adding the user I used to connect to the KVM host to the wheel group. I do not know if this is actually required since it is not documented as such. GitHub

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template! GitHub link:

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources Same as https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8824 - sounds like setup/config issue of kvm/libvirtd GitHub link:

Re: [D] Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Unable to add the host: Cannot find the server resources > I did some further investigation and it seems I do not have to add the user > to the wheel group. If I add the host for the first time I receive the error: > > ``` > Error

Re: [D] Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) @therev3l4 did you allow root ssh based login with password or ssh-key? What installation guide or steps have you followed ? GitHub link:

Re: [D] Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent ) @therev3l4 the general steps to debug this is to look at the management-server and agent logs to see why it failed. Since this looks like an initial setup issue with

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache ``` root@nuc1:/# apt install cloudstack-agent Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be

[REVIVE][DISCUSS] Closing issues & PR after a certain time

People, I want to revive this discussion and bring Vishesh' PR under your attention again. The discussion there is mostly about the length of the period before closing. So here I am going to state 1year - first warning, 1.5years second warning, 2 years closing. What do you all think? There are

Re: Guest VM connecting DC NAS

Hi Nixon, In an isolated guest network you could create a guest instance and use it as a NAS? In a shared network you will have more flexibility in using existing NAS in the cloudstack provisioned guest instances. -Jithin From: Nixon Varghese K S Date: Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 7:04 AM To:

Re: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password

For the SSVM issue this article might help you, specifically check for the management server IP connectivity on port 8250. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting Regarding the login issue you mentioned I am not sure about

RE: Guest VM connecting DC NAS

When using advanced networking, I believe there's an option to create site to site tunnel. Maybe you can establish a tunnel between the isolated network via the VR and onsite DC firewall/router. But of course, it's going through public/Internet which might hinder the network performance

Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password

I'm currently learning CS and setting up a POC environment. Two system VMs is running on the same KVM host in my 3 KVM host cluster. However, the secondary storage VM Agent state is shown as Connecting. I've SSH into the secondary storage VM and can assure that it can reach the Internet and

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Hi Fernando, It’s a wildcard that is being replaced by a wildcard :) But the sslcerts table is empty in the database so something went wrong. In the meantime I found my issue, the strange part is that the webgui does not check on if the certificate is correct, as I was missing the: -END

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Jummy, I understand. Many times when you change the certificate you start using a Domain Validation certificate (DV SSL) instead of a Wilcard certificate. If the global URL configuration is set to dynamic, the certificate does not work and the console service does not work either. --- Fernando.

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Hi, It’s an existing deployment, I just tried renewing the certificate, before I started with the renewal it worked fine, so I think I borked something but what it is, I don’t know, I just followed the document I made before for myself. -- Jimmy From: Fernando Alvarez Date: Monday, 29 April

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Hi Jimmy, Check these values in the global setting: consoleproxy.url.domain domain used for CPVM consoleproxy.sslEnabled Switches SSL configuration of the CPVMon / off And check if the URL configuration is set to Static or Dynamic. If it is Dynamic remember that you need a Wildcard SSL

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Hi Ruben, That made me being able to login :) I seem to be getting this: Apr 29 12:25:49 v-144-VM systemd[1]: cloud.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Apr 29 12:25:48 v-144-VM _run.sh[58945]: 12:25:48,272 INFO Agent:314 - Stopping the agent: Reason = sig.kill Apr 29

Re: AMD Processor support in compute offering

Thanks for the reply Ivan. We would like to develop this feature for our business and sponsor to the ACS community so that others can also be benefited. Any developer help in the community to add this feature (we will pay for it) would be greatly appreciated. Regards Loges On Tue, Apr 23, 2024

Re: Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Jimmy, you can run "cloudstack-ssh 169.x.x.x" or "ssh -i /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud -p 3922 root@169.x.x.x" from the hypervisor running the system VM to SSH into the system VM. On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:09 PM Jimmy Huybrechts wrote: > Hi, > > So I replaced the SSL certficate today since it uses

Replaced SSL now console proxy not working

Hi, So I replaced the SSL certficate today since it uses lets encrypt. My secondary storage worked fine after recreation, but it seems my consoleproxy doesn’t as it shows agent state disconnected, connecting, disconnected. Now obviously I don’t have any console now so I can’t see what is wrong

Re: SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported | port 8250 on Management servers

Hi Vivek, I think you can tune the following global settings to regenerate CloudStack's root-ca certificates with chosen cipher/algorithm and key size: (depending on the ACS version if it has CA framework) ca.framework.cert.signature.algorithm ca.framework.cert.keysize (for an already

SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported | port 8250 on Management servers

Hello Folks, Our security team has highlighted that services running on port 8250 supports the use of SSL ciphers that offer medium strength encryption. Nessus regards medium strength as any encryption that uses key lengths at least 64 bits and less than 112 bits, It is considerably easier

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all the IPtable rules on the host. I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack or UFW. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all Iptables rules on the host. I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack or UFW. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @dR3b a user has replied to to this thread in the users mailing list, no idea why it is not present here

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Yes! ``` root@nuc1:/# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 ``` GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-9258076 This is an automatically

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Yes, in theory it sounds good, but the IPv6 overlap check seems to block everything. I think our best way forward is to move the network to ROOT and ensure all free IPs are allocated in the db so that other users cannot use the network. Thanks for thinking along Wei, Daan and Pearl! On Fri, Apr

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

i noticed similar issue on 4.19 ... iptables -F on the host resolved it... seems somthing wasnt being setup right with rules On Monday 29 April 2024 02:18:03 AM (-04:00), dR3b (via GitHub) wrote: > > GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as > KVM hosts? >

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra edited a comment on the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) CloudStack 4.17.0.1 Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 host java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:)

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra edited a comment on the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) CloudStack 4.17.0.1 Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 pnqsun java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:)

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the installation. - [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running - [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up and

Re: [D] Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) [cloudstack]

GitHub user bkrajendra added a comment to the discussion: Host-HA vs VM-HA (was: KVMHAMonitor getting initialized without host ha enabled) Recently I also started getting this issue: ``` Apr 27 07:50:33 pnqsun java: WARN [kvm.resource.KVMHAMonitor] (Thread-1:) (logid:) Write heartbeat for

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? Yes! ``` root@nuc1:/# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward 1 ``` GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-9258076 This is an automatically sent email for

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @dR3b Is IP forwarding enabled? The following command should return 1 cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward GitHub link:

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? @weizhouapache Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the installation. - [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running - [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up and

Re: No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Hi Rishi, If you want to create a template manually, you can refer to https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.1/adminguide/templates/_create_linux.html Some users use packer to build templates automatically, for example https://github.com/PCextreme/packer-templates -Wei On Sun, Apr 28,

Re: No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Thank you Wei - since I am testing it on a different architecture, is there a way of creating my own templates (similar to Centos templates) ? On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 2:08 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Rishi, > > The systemvm template is not used for user vms. As you have noticed, > the network

Re: No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Hi Rishi, The systemvm template is not used for user vms. As you have noticed, the network interfaces are configured by cloudstack , dhcp does not work. You can test with the built-in Centos 5 templates. You can also try the templates on http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ (provided by NuxRo) -Wei

No IP assigned to VM instance even though UI/router says otherwise

Hi there, I am trying to understand why a VM instance created by Cloudstack does not get an IP address in "Basic network" configuration. Interestingly, unter the "instances" page UI shows an IP assigned to my VM instance. Furthermore, the router VM adds an entry for my VM/IP in its "/etc/hosts"

Re: [D] Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM hosts? I think a shared network with vlan=untagged is what you need. You can use an advanced zone or advanced zone with security groups, or even a basic zone. GitHub link:

Guest VM connecting DC NAS

Hi All, The optimum way to get NFS storage on the ACS guest VM is what we're attempting to determine.This test environment is set up for advanced networking on ACS (4.19.1). ACS Portal: 10.10.40.252 NFS server: 10.10.40.250 KVM host: 172.16.0.100 (Have two network interface cards, one for

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Pearl and Ruben, I think the main issue is that both networks (same gateway/cidr but under different accounts) should work. Pearl's idea is good, we can add some steps as below - backup the database - remove a Free IP from `user_ip_address` table - create a shared network with startip/endip =

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

I did not hit the issue with overlapping IP ranges as the network in the destination domain / account was initially created with a different vlan and then they were updated (or swapped) with the VLAN in the source domain. However, I did not test with IPv6.

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Pearl, Thanks for the suggestion. Yes, assignVirtualMachine is an option, but in this case the used network is not accessible by the destination domain/account. Creating the same network twice also doesn't seem like an option due to NetUtils.ipRangesOverlap. It also seems to not be a

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Ruben, Have you tried the 'Assign Instance to Another Account' (assignVirtualMachine API) operation on the stopped VMs. This would help in moving the VM(s) from one domain/account to another. I did a small test to see if we could preserve the IP and it seemed to work but I may be wrong in

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Wei, the use cases may vary. In some cases it will be moved completely to a different domain+account, in other cases not. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:48 PM Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hi Ruben, > > Will you move all VMs on the network to another account, or just some > of the VMs ? > > -Wei > > On Fri, Apr

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Ruben, Will you move all VMs on the network to another account, or just some of the VMs ? -Wei On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:44 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Thanks Daan :-) Hope there are others with some ideas as well! > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:42 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > > ok, from

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Thanks Daan :-) Hope there are others with some ideas as well! On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:42 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, from what I know now I have exhausted my clues. Hope you get your > migration done expediently. > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > > > Hmm, that

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

ok, from what I know now I have exhausted my clues. Hope you get your migration done expediently. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hmm, that might be possible. However we would like to automate as much as > possible. Changing existing IPs to unused ones is not an option,

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hmm, that might be possible. However we would like to automate as much as possible. Changing existing IPs to unused ones is not an option, no. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:25 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > ok, and you probably can't redistribute the IPs in the domain or > define the order of migration

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

ok, and you probably can't redistribute the IPs in the domain or define the order of migration to be in line with the range? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 2:01 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > The target domain already exists with VMs running in it > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:46 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote:

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

The target domain already exists with VMs running in it On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:46 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > so probably a stupoid suggestion, but why ot rename the domain then? > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > > > Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

so probably a stupoid suggestion, but why ot rename the domain then? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:04 PM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in the end all VMs will > move to the other domain. > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > >

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi Daan, cases may vary. For our first migration in the end all VMs will move to the other domain. On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 12:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Ruben, do you need to move domainA completely to domainB or do you > need to move *some* VMs from it? > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:00 AM

Re: Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Ruben, do you need to move domainA completely to domainB or do you need to move *some* VMs from it? On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:00 AM Ruben Bosch wrote: > > Hi all, > > We're looking into the following. We are using advanced networking on ACS > 4.16.1 (upgrading soon to 4.18.1). We have a guest

Re: CloudStack management server as a VM on KVM hypervisor

Hi Kapil, It can be done but it's not wise. You'd need to manually start the VM. We run a small Proxmox cluster to host our ACS supporting VMs: management, rabbitmq, influxdb, secondary storage nfs. Kind regards, Ruben Bosch On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:46 AM Kapil Bhuskute wrote: > Hello, >

Shared guest network assigned to multiple domains

Hi all, We're looking into the following. We are using advanced networking on ACS 4.16.1 (upgrading soon to 4.18.1). We have a guest network that is assigned to a specific domain A (ROOT/foo/domainA). Now we will need to move VMs from domain A to domain B (ROOT/bar/domainB) while preserving IP

CloudStack management server as a VM on KVM hypervisor

Hello, We need to know about below two possibilities for setting up the cloud stack environment. 1. Can we setup the 'Cloudstack Management Server' as a VM hosted on the same set of KVM hypervisor cluster that we need to manage in CloudStack? 2. How do we recover the cloud stack

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Pearl, I think due to download errors from some of the public templates (official linux cloud templates are affected), the migration process stucks is not proceeding. I have deleted these templates and redownloaded them manually. Still, the job is still in status "scheduled". @Jithin:

Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

I've some notes on Debian here - https://gist.github.com/rohityadavcloud/fc401a0fe8e8ea16b4b3a4e3d149ce0c Last time I tested it worked for me. Regards. From: lists Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 13:25 To: users Subject: Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Mevludin, Just curious about how you are migrating the secondary storage. Are you using the CloudStack feature to migrate data across secondary storage? So you added a new secondary storage and cloudstack already started syncing the public templates from URLs? -Jithin From: Pearl d'Silva

Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi Mevludin, When migrating data to another secondary store, it only considers private templates and public templates with no url - those which are created from snapshots or volumes. Public templates with URLs are automatically synced(downloaded) on to the newly added secondary store. So, they

Adding S3 secondary storage fails with NullPointerException

Hi all, I got a null pointer exception while adding s3 secondary storage to my Cloudstack cluster. This is related to this exact issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8956 I got a few questions:  - Is there a known workaround for this yet?  - My workaround would be to setup NFS

Cloudstack Zabbix Monitoring

Hi there, Is anyone using Zabbix to monitor the management JAVA processes? I tried to add a JMX interface to the host with the following parameters on management server: -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=3344 -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project @GutoVeronezi points to the more abstract reasons we want to allow breaking changes. We have long had a list of more mondain reasons to introduce breaking changes: - API truly restful -

Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

Hi all, it looks like with every secondary storage migration Cloudstack tries to re-download all templates with URLs instead of simply grabbing the already downloaded template from the old image store. If that's true, how to avoid that behaviour? Mevludin

Re: Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

Hi Ive deployed recent on both 11 and 12. What issue on 12 did you encounter? > > On Apr 25, 2024 at 1:59 PM, Khang Nguyen Phuc > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > I'm a newbie, and I mainly use Debian servers. So I want to deploy > CloudStack on Debian. I've

Deploy Cloudstack on Debian 12

Hello everyone, I'm a newbie, and I mainly use Debian servers. So I want to deploy CloudStack on Debian. I've experimented with CloudStack 4.19 on Debian 11 , it works fine, but I noticed that CloudStack doesn't officially support Debian (CloudStack's documentation recommends using Ubuntu or

Re: Recommended method of generating SystemVM images for new arch?

Hi Rishi You can follow this mailing list discussion to generate systemvm template for different arch https://lists.apache.org/list?users@cloudstack.apache.org:2023-1:Cloudstack%20on%20arm64%20and%20packer%20build%20systemvmtemplate%20success Regards Kiran From: Rishi Misra Date: Wednesday,

Recommended method of generating SystemVM images for new arch?

Hi there, Is there a recommended way of generating SystemVM images for new architecture? I tried using build.sh but I'm not sure if there is an easy way of doing it since packer may require tweaking on archs for it to

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release good to know, be interesting to see 8.3 and CS working GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214727 This is an automatically sent email for

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release xo-lite should not have any impact, it's just another client of the same API GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9214408 This is an automatically sent

Re: [D] Define a release schedule for the project [cloudstack]

GitHub user GutoVeronezi added a comment to the discussion: Define a release schedule for the project Hello guys, Thanks @JoaoJandre for raising the discussion. Many might understand the benefits and the necessity of having a well-defined versioning schema; however, I feel that it is

Re: [D] Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Enhancing CloudStack Management UI Accessibility with Keyboard Shortcuts Good to hear @apurv-1 - after struggling to get your PR in, we abandoned our own effort mainly due to support with vue3 and latest ant-d. If you're up for

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Good to hear! It's been a while since xcp-ng had a release. If it is backward compatible wrt API, usage and guest OS then adding support would be a straightforward entry in the hypervisor support

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user outbackdingo added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release not sure how their xoa lite will affect it, as its on and installed by default on 8.3, anyway willing to test GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9213608

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr edited a comment on the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it). But this will be done after release in my opinion. GitHub link:

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user shwstppr added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release We may need to add some changes for hypervisor support, similar to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4672 (maybe part of it) GitHub link:

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user ydirson added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release No API breakage, only introduction of new APIs for new functionalities (e.g. vTPM) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964#discussioncomment-9209551 This is an automatically

Re: Microvms Firecracker integration with ACS

anyone? maybe facing the need to implement microvms? Atte, Ricardo Pertuz On 21 Apr 2024 at 7:10 AM -0500, Ricardo Pertuz , wrote: > Hey Community, > > Has anyone been able to integrate ACS with Firecracker or is it something on > the roadmap?. Thanks > > BR, > > Ricardo

Re: [D] Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release [cloudstack]

GitHub user sbrueseke added a comment to the discussion: Upcoming XCP-ng 8.3 release Are there any api changes? As far as I understand version 8.3 should work as long as the used api calls are still working. GitHub link:

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >