Re: CS 4.2 + VMware - Dynamic VM scaling problems

are I can expand the CPU/RAM resources. For this reason I believe that the problem could be on the CS 4.2 side. Thanks in advance for your reply. Gaspare On 23/11/2013 11:34, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Gaspare A. Silvestri > wrote: >> Hi all, >> &

CS 4.2 + VMware - Dynamic VM scaling problems

Hi all, I'm currently on a CS 4.2 + VMware vSphere 5.1 infrastructure, and I'm having issues with the dynamic resource scaling for Linux virtual machines; all the Linux templates are based on 64bit operatins systems. All the CS parameters are correct (enable.dynamic.scale.vm and scale.retry are c

Re: Secondary Storage address info

public IPs on the same subnet. Thanks again for your precious support. Kind regards, Gaspare On 21/11/2013 11:44, Shanker Balan wrote: > Comments inline. > > On 21-Nov-2013, at 3:39 pm, Gaspare A. Silvestri > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've got a question a

Secondary Storage address info

Hi all, I've got a question about the secondary storage: the entire CloudStack infrastructure I've currently installed has got public IP addressing; in your opinion, is it possible attacching and working on an NFS secondary storage with a local IP address (172.16.0.0/16 class , for instance)? Tha

Re: CS 4.2 + VMware + Local storage

nd use the same for your VM deployment > > Regards > Sadhu > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gaspare A. Silvestri [mailto:g.silves...@netsons.com] > Sent: 06 November 2013 19:59 > To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Fwd: CS 4.2 + VMware + L

Fwd: CS 4.2 + VMware + Local storage

Hi all, I've recently deployed a CS 4.2 infrastructure with VMware vSphere 5.1 and the local storage enabled. I've deployed with no problems the firs two system's VMs (SSVM and CPVM), then when I try to deploy an instance from a template (starting so the creation of the router machine), I receiv

CS 4.2 + VMware + Local storage

Hi all, I've recently deployed a CS 4.2 infrastructure with VMware vSphere 5.1 and the local storage enabled. I've deployed with no problems the firs two system's VMs (SSVM and CPVM), then when I try to deploy an instance from a template (starting so the creation of the router machine), I receive

CS 4.2 -- DB problems after params update

Hello everybody, after I've updated the max size global settings in the Cloudstack UI, I receive the following error when I try to create an instance: " DB Exception on: SELECT DISTINCT capacity.pod_id FROM `cloud`.`op_host_capacity` capacity INNER JOIN `cloud`.`host_pod_ref` pod ON (pod.id = cap

Re: CS 4.2 - "DC already managed" issue

; Selecting your vCenter (top of the tree on the right hand side) and > clicking the Datacenters tab I can see the field. I've attached a > screen shot but it might get stripped out. > Inline images 1 > > Sean > > > On 26 September 2013 10:41, Gaspare A Silvestri > ma

Re: CS 4.2 - "DC already managed" issue

which will be set to 'true'. If you want to remove the parameter just delete the text. Hope this helps. Sean On 26 September 2013 09:44, Gaspare A Silvestri wrote: Hello everybody, I'm testing the CS 4.2 release, I've installed and configured an infrastructure (

CS 4.2 - "DC already managed" issue

Hello everybody, I'm testing the CS 4.2 release, I've installed and configured an infrastructure (VMware based), then I've removed all the configurations and I've tried to execute a new Zone setupwith no luck; I'm receiving the following error: " This DC is being managed by other CloudStack deplo

CS 4.2 release date

Hello everybody, when will the CS 4.2 version be released? Thanks in advance, Gaspare

New root volume from snapshot

Hello everybody, is it possible generating a new root volume from a snapshot created by the root volume, and then assigning it to the same VM as root disk, deleting the old one? What I'm trying to explain is a way to operate similar to the hypervisor snapshot, using the new volume (considere

CS 4.1.1 + vSphere 5.1 - Windows 2012 issues

Hello everybody, we're trying to deploy instances from a correctly imported Windows 2012 OVA template with no luck, we always receive the following error on the VCenter: "Invalid configuration for device " . Is it possible deploying Windows 2012 instances on CS 4.1.1? In this case, are there

Re: Debian 7 does not get hostname from dhcp.

Hi Shanker, thank you for your answer. Which way have we to use the indicated hook? Within the same password script, or as external script to execute at the machine startup? Thanks in advance, Gaspare On 19/08/2013 12:42, Shanker Balan wrote: On 09-Aug-2013, at 9:42 AM, Prasanna Santhanam

Re: CS 4.1.1 -- Multiple NICs for instance

.  From: Gaspare A Silvestri <g.silves...@netsons.com> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org> Date: Tuesday, 13 August 2013 6:00 PM To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"

Re: CS 4.1.1 -- Multiple NICs for instance

use of it. If you want to attach additional network after the vm is deployed then there is another API I.e. "addNicToVirtualMachine" Thanks, SWAMY On 13/08/13 5:46 PM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" wrote: Hello everybody, is it possible assigning more than one NIC

CS 4.1.1 -- Multiple NICs for instance

Hello everybody, is it possible assigning more than one NIC to a VM instance? If so, which way can I perform this task? Thanks inadvance, Gaspare

Re: VMware 5.1 - Security groups error

VM, but I can't find any information about SG problems with VMware. Thanks in advance for your attention. Gaspare On 13/08/2013 12:30, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: Security Groups feature is only supported in XenServer and KVM. It doesn't work with Vmware hypervisor. On 13/

VMware 5.1 - Security groups error

Hello everybody, during the assignment of a VM instance to a Security Group other than the default, I've received the following error message: "Security group feature is not supported for vmWare hypervisor" . I've got a Basic Networkconfiguration, I've enabled the Security Groups offer in Ph

Guest VM password reset - Complexity

Hello everybody, is therea way to improve the password complexity when generating a password using the reset guest password script? Thanks in advance, Gaspare

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

ilya   PS: ping me on IRC, nick serverchief – should be much easier and faster.     From: Gaspare A Silvestri [mailto:g.silves...@netsons.com

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

t I would try - as a test - create a cronjob on system vms and continuously ping cloudstack management server (or something few hops away). Give this couple of hours and see if you lose connectivity again. -Original Message- From: Gaspare A Silvestri [mailto:g.silves...@netsons.com

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

Hello everybody, is there anybody who can help me with my previous requests? Thanks in advance, Gaspare On 04/08/2013 12:11, Gaspare A Silvestri wrote: Hello everybody, I've configured the parameters we talked about (Host configured with the CS Management private address), with no

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

it point to the IP that management server is listening at (on Management network), if you have a management server cluster setup, this IP should be the load-balancer IP for the management server cluster Kelven On 7/29/13 10:14 PM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" wrote: Hello e

Re: Template - Root disk size changes

://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/resize-data-volumes.html Thanks, SWAMY On 01/08/13 11:48 AM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" wrote: Hello everybody, is it possibleincreasing the root disk size on a predefined template? What I'm trying to sayisthat if I'll deploy a templ

Template - Root disk size changes

Hello everybody, is it possibleincreasing the root disk size on a predefined template? What I'm trying to sayisthat if I'll deploy a template with a thin disk starting from 10GB, for example, and I will decide to create an instance with 50GB HDD, is this extension automatically performed by C

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

No problems! :) Best regards, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:41, Noel Kendall wrote: NO, actually, please ignore my reply. I replied to the wrong message. My deepest apologies for the confusion.Noel Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:41 +0200 From: g.silves...@netsons.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

Hi Noel, do you confirm that the value wrote by Kelven (Manager MGMT net IP) is the right address to configure? Thanks, Gaspare On 31/07/2013 16:03, Hotmail wrote: It does indeed have the correct configuration value

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

is listening at (on Management network), if you have a management server cluster setup, this IP should be the load-balancer IP for the management server cluster Kelven On 7/29/13 10:14 PM, "Gaspare A Silvestri" wrote: Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues abo

Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues about the ability to manage the system VMs (Console Proxy + Secondary Storage VM); I've got the following configuration: * Cloudstack 4.1 * VMware vSphere 5.1 * Standard networking configuration * vSwitch0 on the public network (Guest network) -

CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue

Hello everybody, I'm recently having issues about the ability to manage the system VMs (Console Proxy + Secondary Storage VM); I've got the following configuration: * Cloudstack 4.1 * VMware vSphere 5.1 * Standard networking configuration * vSwitch0 on the public network (Guest network) -

Re: vSphere 5.1 support

ally, I do not think its supported as CS still uses vsphere 4.1 API calls I believe but I could be wrong. On 2013/06/08, at 1:50, Gaspare A Silvestri wrote: Hello everybody, does CS 4.1 support VMware vSphere 5.1 version? Thanks in advance, Gaspare

Re: vSphere 5.1 support

Hello everybody, does CS 4.1 support VMware vSphere 5.1 version? Thanks in advance, Gaspare

vSphere 5.1 support

Hello everybody, does CS 4.1 support VMware vSphere 5.1 version? Thanks in advance, Gaspare

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 On 27/05/2013 16:41, Kevin wrote: +1 On May 27, 2013, at 8:11 AM, "Nehal J. Wani" wrote: +1 On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Alex Huang wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 1:27 AM To: market...@cloudstac