Re: mem.overprovisioning.facto and KVM

2014-01-24 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I guess not. It should work though. We ran into the same issue with storage, everything hardcoded to only work with vmware. I'll take a look. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 25, 2013, at 2:59 AM, Harikrishna Patnala

Re: mem.overprovisioning.facto and KVM

2014-01-24 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Looks like it works as of 4.2, but you need to update existing cluster settings, rather than global (or both, I suppose). On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I guess not. It should work though. We ran into the same issue with storage, everything hardcoded

Re: Status of CLVM?

2014-01-08 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, because current snapshot is really Copy raw-formatted LVM volume to qcow2 file on secondary storage. So there is no real LVM snapshot, and if there were, it wouldn't be copied internally. On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I've just watched Marcus Sorensen's

Re: Status of CLVM?

2014-01-08 Thread Marcus Sorensen
You'd create a sharedmountpoint style primary storage, which would host qcow2 files. You can do this via iscsi, fibrechannel, or any other SAN tech. On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, because current snapshot is really Copy raw-formatted LVM volume

Re: 4.2.0 Upgrade and System Templates (KVM - Ubuntu 12.04)

2013-10-26 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, you do need to upgrade your system VMS, and you should also have a new systemvm.iso that was bundled in the cloudstack-common deb file that would have been installed as an upgrade on your KVM hosts. I also feel that the documentation of system vm upgrade is lacking. The only place I know if

Re: High CPU utilization on KVM hosts while doing RBD snapshot - was Re: snapshot caused host disconnected

2013-10-07 Thread Marcus Sorensen
You may want to post this to the ceph mailing list as well. On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote: Dear Wido and all, I performed some further tests last night: (1) CPU utilization of the KVM host while RBD snapshot running is still shooting up high even after I

Re: [URGENT] Mounting issues from KVM hosts to secondary storage

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Are you using the release artifacts, or your own 4.2 build? When you rebooted the host, did the problem go away or come back the same? You may want to look at 'virsh pool-list' to see if libvirt is mounting/registering the secondary storage. Is this happening on multiple hosts, the same way? You

Re: [URGENT] Mounting issues from KVM hosts to secondary storage

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
reply inline. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote: Are you using the release artifacts, or your own 4.2 build? [Indra:] We are using the release artifacts from below repo since we are using Ubuntu: deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 4.2

Re: Resize data-disk doesn't work after upgrade

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I just tested local storage qcow2 and CLVM resize on 4.2, they both worked. Resize works like this: 1. Do sanity checks 2. Send resize command to the agent 3. Resize the disk/lun/file 4. Inform the VM instance that the disk has changed by making a libvirt volBlockResize call (this is not fatal,

Re: Resize data-disk doesn't work after upgrade

2013-10-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I just tested local storage qcow2 and CLVM resize on 4.2, they both worked. Resize works like this: 1. Do sanity checks 2. Send resize command to the agent 3

RE: CloudStack VPC - VPN - VPC

2013-08-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
It is possible, sort of. You have to bring both up at the same time, otherwise they will time out and fail. There is no mode to make one side or the other just listen for connections. On Aug 23, 2013 12:37 AM, Kimihiko Kitase kimihiko.kit...@citrix.co.jp wrote: Thanks! Is it in 4.2?

Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

2013-08-01 Thread Marcus Sorensen
later. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic

Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

2013-08-01 Thread Marcus Sorensen
, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm short on time, but here's the KVM advanced networking config we use for testing. If someone wants to write a doc based around it that would be nice. Start out KVM host with two networks, eth0, eth1. eth0 is intended for public

Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

2013-07-31 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the

Re: Unable to migrate VM to another host

2013-07-23 Thread Marcus Sorensen
There is no cloud user on the host/agent side. Agent runs as root. Or is this an experiment to try to run the agent as another user? On Jul 23, 2013 4:44 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 06:19:06PM +0800, Indra Pramana wrote: Dear Prasanna and all, I

Re: cloudstack 4.1 QinQ vlan behaviour

2013-07-10 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I created that document, as a suggestion. I never got feedback. The way it worked previously was sort of a happy accident, which was 'fixed' when the code changed to accept overlapping vlan numbers on multiple physical devices (hence the bridge name change). However... I believe there is still a

Re: ebtables

2013-04-19 Thread Marcus Sorensen
you can go back and disable security groups in the zone if you don't care about the ebtables rules, or you can start up ebtables and then restart any associated VMs through cloudstack. The rules are dynamic, so they're not going to be saved anywhere on the host to be reinstated, they have to be

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

2013-04-19 Thread Marcus Sorensen
That's reflected by this line: ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywheretcp dpts:vnc-server:synchronet-db Although we don't know what interfaces it applies to because we don't have an 'iptables -L -v' If stopping iptables fixes Maurice's problem it would be interesting to

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

2013-04-19 Thread Marcus Sorensen
What do you see in : On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.comwrote: I've tried it with them disabled (iptables get written) and enabled (the same issue) The cron job seemed to do the trick, until someone just mentioned to try: iptables -I INPUT -p tcp -m

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

2013-04-19 Thread Marcus Sorensen
what do you see in: cat /proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge* ? I think I've seen issues with these being set to 1, but I think it might need to be set to 1 if you're using security groups. On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote: What do you see in : On Fri

Re: Emergency: Cloud NOT starting

2013-04-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
[cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl] (EventChecker-1:null) Found 0 events to be purged 2013-04-13 12:43:59,186 DEBUG [network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (RouterStatusMonitor-1:null) Found 0 routers. [root@lunder agent]# On Apr 13, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Emergency: Cloud NOT starting

2013-04-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
A brctl show would also be good to have. On Apr 13, 2013 11:52 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: If you do a virsh list on the agent there's a good chance you would see a VM running, however the system will only wait so long for it to boot up before shutting it down, so

Re: Cloudstack KVM Failing

2013-04-02 Thread Marcus Sorensen
, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: This looks like your console proxy VM isn't working. It could be firewall on the KVM host not allowing access to 5900+ anymore, or the consoleproxy VM may need to be restarted (system VM starting with v). Has it worked in the past? You could try