Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-05 Thread DavidM
d Grid? Thanks David -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-05 Thread DavidM
Looks like Spark Datagrid can't do locked rows or columns, so, I guess it's out. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9315.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
vs Spark Looks like Spark Datagrid can't do locked rows or columns, so, I guess it's out. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9315.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
owever, I'm not sure it can do that ? One way to do that would be to break the sdk into modules, each with it's own minimum dependencies, something like NPM in the Node world, or Leiningen in the Clojure world. David -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.23

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I'll look into 4.13 again, because I'm curious to see how a Spark Datagrid > with locking rows and columns compares to an MX Datagrid, however, I've not > found a way to use SDK 4.13 without also changing the minimum player > requirements. The 4.13 SDK will work with all player versions dow

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
ed anywhere in the documentation? Is there a list of new features introduced since 4.6.0? For example, the Spark Datagrid functionality? Thanks David -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9321.html Sent from the Apache

RE: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
s exceeded the MX version then the rest of the components have too). IS that correct? -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9322.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Alex Harui
orrect? > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-t >p9314p9322.html >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The notion that I can get all the bug fixes and new features all the way up > to 4.13.0, and also not have to increase Player requirements is huge. I wish > I'd have known that earlier - is it described anywhere in the documentation? Yep in the README [1] > Is there a list of new features

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The Spark Datagrid seems to use a canvas to scroll and is much, much, more > responsive that the MX Datagrid. The performance of theMX data grid has had significant improvement to performance of it in 4.13 over 4.6 you may want to test that first before moving to the spark datagrid. It wi

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
BTW, I'm using 50 columns, and 100 rows, with 2 locked columns, and 4 locked rows. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9327.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
grid height to stretch to 100%: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9326.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
Thanks Justin. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9328.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
nitialize="init(event)" height="100%"> . -- View this message in context: http://apache-

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread DavidM
on OSX, I'm assuming that performance will be much better on Windoze (at least that used to be the case). Dave -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9330.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-06 Thread Alex Harui
="false" > sortableColumns="false" > resizableColumns="false" > dragMoveEnabled="false" > draggableColumns="false" > > > >

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-07 Thread DavidM
eVirtualLayout='true' ? David -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/Flex-Datagrid-MX-vs-Spark-tp9314p9351.html Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Flex Datagrid: MX vs Spark

2015-01-08 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/7/15, 4:55 PM, "DavidM" wrote: > >Your answer explains why I didn't see any performance difference, however, >isn't it still a bug for a layout not not respect height="100%" when >useVirtualLayout='true' ? Yeah, that’s probably a bug, but I don’t know how many folks leverage that option in