On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:37:52 +
Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Such attitude is dying out.
>
> Modern devices almost entirely force people into top-posting and
> almost all people new to mailing-lists will have no idea about the
> possibility of doing anything other than top-posting. Some allow
Il 05/02/2014 21:48, e-letter ha scritto:
On 05/02/2014, Marcello Romani wrote:
For the record, I've been a happy user of "soffice" even before the 1.0
release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful
desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-)
I miss that! :) And starmail
Hi :)
+1
I definitely agree with that. We are supposed to be pro-freedom so it
makes a LOT of sense! Well said Peter
Many regards from
Tom :)
On 6 February 2014 00:40, Peter West wrote:
> I'll never proselytise for top posting if you never proselytise for
> bottom-posting.
>
> When I see some
Le 06/02/2014 06:59, Jean-Francois Nifenecker a écrit :
Hi Mark, Jean-François,
> Once this is set, click Class path
> In the new dialog:
> (1) Add an archive
> Point to the hsqldb.jar on your PC (mine is C:\Program
> Files\hsqldb-2.2.8.\lib)
> (2) Add a file
> Point to the above \lib subdir
Not
Le 06/02/2014 05:50, Mark LaPierre a écrit :
> Hey all,
>
> I have HSQLDB installed here:
> /home/database/back/hsqldb/lib/hsqldb.jar
>
> I want the Base front end here:
> /home/database/recipe/recipe.odb
>
> On the LibreOffice Database Wizard:
> 1. Select Database
> I select the radio but
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 09:40:08AM +1000, Peter West wrote:
> On 6/02/2014 5:31 am, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
> >>
> >>Bottom posting requires a ton of extra work such as trimming and such
> >>which office workers really do not have time f
Hey all,
I have HSQLDB installed here:
/home/database/back/hsqldb/lib/hsqldb.jar
I want the Base front end here:
/home/database/recipe/recipe.odb
On the LibreOffice Database Wizard:
1. Select Database
I select the radio button: [Connect to an existing database]
I select [JDBC] in
I'll never proselytise for top posting if you never proselytise for
bottom-posting.
When I see someone hinting, suggesting, urging or just plain bullying a
top-poster to reform his or her bad habits, I'll buy in. And of course,
you can do the same thing if the shoe is on the other foot.
Can
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 6:26 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
On 06/02/14 10:21, null wrote:
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 6:16 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
Yes!! It works!
I see that as well as the other changes relating to the DOCTYPE line
you've added a tag.
Well, actually, there was an HTML tag in the file before. Yo
On February 5, 2014 3:40:08 PM PST, Peter West wrote:
That simply demonstrates that it is not beneficial to either the writer, nor
the reader.
>On 6/02/2014 5:31 am, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
>>>
>>> Bottom posting requires a ton of
And a good job of trimming the post too!
I wonder, does top-posting promote sequential reading of the argument?
alright; just having fun now. this is losing all point. winter is
getting to us.
F.
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, anne-ology wrote:
Well said, Peter.
From: Peter West
Date: Wed,
Well said, Peter.
From: Peter West
Date: Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: low traffic lately?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
On 6/02/2014 5:31 am, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
>
>>
>> Bottom posti
On 6/02/2014 5:31 am, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
Bottom posting requires a ton of extra work such as trimming and such
which office workers really do not have time for.
Trimming is a sensible thing to do, whichever way you post. It's wo
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Such attitude is dying out.
Modern devices almost entirely force people into top-posting and
almost all people new to mailing-lists will have no idea about the
possibility of doing anyt
On 06/02/14 10:21, null wrote:
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 6:16 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
Yes!! It works!
I see that as well as the other changes relating to the DOCTYPE line
you've added a tag.
Well, actually, there was an HTML tag in the file before. You may not
have seen it because the source was c
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 6:16 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
Yes!! It works!
I see that as well as the other changes relating to the DOCTYPE line
you've added a tag.
Well, actually, there was an HTML tag in the file before. You may not
have seen it because the source was crammed into one line. I think I
Yes!! It works!
I see that as well as the other changes relating to the DOCTYPE line
you've added a tag.
Keith
On 06/02/14 09:56, null wrote:
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 5:29 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried all of those changes and none of them work.
Does this file work?:
https://doc-0
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 5:29 PM, Keith Bates wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried all of those changes and none of them work.
Does this file work?:
https://doc-0g-8s-docs.googleusercontent.com/docs/securesc/ha0ro937gcuc7l7deffksulhg5h7mbp1/8ka37k9nojan5h3m348ambggvqd7vnq8/139163760/12418654871184392135/*/
Hi,
I've just tried all of those changes and none of them work.
Additionally, I've tried opening from a blank Writer/Web document, from
file manager, from the opening screen- all with the same result.
Just for reference, as we seem to be getting very different results my
version of LO report
Hello,
I just discovered something. If the DOCTYPE of the HTML file is
not the topmost line (line 1), LibreOffice renders the file fine
(instead of showing the source). However, If there is a blank line
before the DOCTYPE (like the HTML file Keith uploaded), the HTML parser
is tripped an
In the FWIW category:
In the past week I have discovered AndrOpen Office which is a fork of Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.
Though it has some significant issues, it is at present a more usable app than
LibreOffice for Android.
I use the spreadsheet feature (Calc) of office suites about 95% but AndrOpe
On 05/02/2014, Marcello Romani wrote:
> For the record, I've been a happy user of "soffice" even before the 1.0
> release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful
> desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-)
I miss that! :) And starmail too...
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: us
At 19:52 05/02/2014 +, David Lynch wrote:
I have spreadsheets where the width of the cell borders varies and
is important. I have about twenty different styles which I apply, by
formula (STYLE()), to several hundred cells. The cells are square.
There are two widths of border 0.05pt and 2.05
Hello,
On 2/5/2014 2:45 PM, libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Uploading the document to the W3C validator (http://validator.w3.org/)
it appears the DOCTYPE is not valid. It should be:
-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
(the file is missing "//EN" from the end).
Not only that; ther
To edit HTML files, I tend to use Kompozer, an WYSIWYG HTML editor, or
just a plain text editor.
On 02/05/2014 02:45 PM, Mark Bourne wrote:
Uploading the document to the W3C validator (http://validator.w3.org/)
it appears the DOCTYPE is not valid. It should be:
-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transit
I have spreadsheets where the width of the cell borders varies and is
important. I have about twenty different styles which I apply, by
formula (STYLE()), to several hundred cells. The cells are square. There
are two widths of border 0.05pt and 2.05 pt.
All is well when the magnification is 100
Uploading the document to the W3C validator (http://validator.w3.org/)
it appears the DOCTYPE is not valid. It should be:
-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
(the file is missing "//EN" from the end).
The original document doesn't fail with the version of LO I have, so
cannot check, but try c
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:37:52PM +, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Such attitude is dying out.
>
> Modern devices almost entirely force people into top-posting and
> almost all people new to mailing-lists will have no idea about the
> possibility of doing anything other than top-posting. Some
I have been doing a little Google searching, and I may have led you
down the wrong path. It may not be possible tot place footnotes within
frames in LibreOffice.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:00 PM, J. Randal Matheny wrote:
> Correct, I think I follow. Question is if frames would be same size on
> eac
Hi :)
Wow!!! It's rare for someone to go ahead and make something like that
which many other people would also probably find useful!! Welcome in
chap!
Is there any chance of you uploading your Extension to
http://extensions.libreoffice.org/
Preferably give it an Open Source / copyleft license s
On February 5, 2014 1:53:59 AM PST, Kracked_P_P wrote:
>both packages has the same "roots" OOo to LO and OOo to AOO, but we are now
>different packages and offer different GUI styles and options, plus our base
>coding has been changed and may not be reflected in AOO's base coding.
Given the
Correct, I think I follow. Question is if frames would be same size on
each page.
But the process to insert the notes still would be something of a
hassle, no?
Thanks!
--
J. Randal Matheny • http://randal.us/
You said / Você disse:
> Well, what I am talking about is the page layout part of this
Well, what I am talking about is the page layout part of this, not the
adding a footnote part. For instance, a frame that is set for two
columns would address your desire to have two columns of footnotes on
a page that otherwise was only one column. And the Marginalia frame
might address your desir
On 02/04/2014 08:01 PM, iveand wrote:
For some of the settings, they aren't correctly seen by the user until
after we remove the user's pre-existing "registrymodifications.xcu"
(even if we didn't intentionally have any of those values overridden).
It is my guess that is because there are some of
No, but would that solve the many steps required to insert data through
the Fields option? From what I gathered, each time the user would have
to go through multiple steps to insert a note. Or am I missing
something?
--
J. Randal Matheny • http://randal.us/
You said / Você disse:
> Have you look
Have you looked at creating a Page Template that contains the fields
and frames you need?
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:54 AM, J. Randal Matheny wrote:
> The solution I got earlier was to insert Fields into the frames, but it
> was a convoluted process that would not appear to be workable for a
> lar
I would say yes to that.
Since LO seems to be used as a web editor - i.e. LibreOffice Writer/Web
options - we should not need to remove the DOCTYPE tag from the HTML
files to get it to work.
On 02/05/2014 10:59 AM, null wrote:
Hello,
It looks like the problem is with LibreOffice interpr
Hello,
It looks like the problem is with LibreOffice interpreting
DOCTYPEs. You see, every HTML is supposed to have a DOCTYPE at the top
of the file, explaining what version of HTML (HTML5, HTML4.01, etc) the
file uses. The file you uploaded has a DOCTYPE of HTML4.01
Transitional. Anywa
The solution I got earlier was to insert Fields into the frames, but it
was a convoluted process that would not appear to be workable for a
large file of, say, hundreds of pages. Or would it?
--
J. Randal Matheny • http://randal.us/
You said / Você disse:
> I think Frames would be the best answer
I think Frames would be the best answer to both problems. A Frame can
be set up to have two columns, for instance, and there is one that
would work well for side notes too I believe.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> If it's not been done already then it might be worth p
Hi :)
If it's not been done already then it might be worth posting a fresh
new bug-report about this but using the LibreOffice bug-tracker rather
than the AOO one.
LO develops far faster and code clean-up has fixed things or smoothed
things out without anyone directly focussing on some of the fixe
Hi :)
Such attitude is dying out.
Modern devices almost entirely force people into top-posting and
almost all people new to mailing-lists will have no idea about the
possibility of doing anything other than top-posting. Some allow
users to reconfigure their devices to bottom-post but it's beyond
Hi :)
Sorry! 2 waggle-the-wires 'answers'.
Have you tried getting to the libreoffice splash-screen (ie with no
documents open) and then dragging the html file into the grey area
where a document would normally be showing?
Also have you tried using
File - Open
and then navigated to the html file
Hi :)
CVAlkan (=Frank) is using Nabble to view things from the mailing-list
and for posting. The 2 other ways are GMane and as just normal
emails. Of those 3 ways it's only Nabble that has a system for
uploading 'attachments'.
Follow the links in Frank's email to get to the right place in Nabble
krackedpress wrote
> So why do I reproduce the issue on Ubuntu 12.04LTS OS with the 64-bit
> 4.1.4.2 version [build - Build ID:
> 0a0440ccc0227ad9829de5f46be37cfb6edcf72], but your Debian 7.3.0 OS does
> not reproduce it?
>
> That is weird. Could there be some OS variant involved here? Same DEB
>
Hi :)
I think the unsubscribe instructions give the link to the "postmaster"
somewhere at the bottom of the page.
It might be getting rejected if you are not sending it from the
correct address. I'm guessing your @gbp emails get forwarded or
pulled into your gmail one? If so then replying from y
Hi Peter:
Hmmm. I hadn't noticed that there was no "attachment" button on this forum,
as I haven't ever uploaded anything longer than a few lines.
Under the "More" button on the top of the message box, there is an option to
"upload a file" but I don't know if other users will have easy access to
Hi,
Can someone please manually re,ove the subscription to this list of my
other email gor...@gbpcomputing.co.uk?
I can't unsubscribe myself as the reply to the confirm unsubscribe is
rejected.
Many thanks
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://
For the record, I've been a happy user of "soffice" even before the 1.0
release (I started being happy right after they dictched that awful
desktop-over-desktop Start Office thing ;-)
Even before LO existed I pushed OO over MSO in the company where I work
(I'm the IT manager). I even introduced
At 11:01 05/02/2014 +0100, Graham Luffrum wrote:
Thanks, Brian (amongst other for making me feel like an idiot).
I'm not sure how you derive that reaction. The only obvious things
are those you happen already to know.
Brian Barker
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscr...@global.libr
Thanks, Brian (amongst other for making me feel like an idiot). You are
right it is not so different, only a matter of knowing where to look. I
was expecting to find a menu item as in Writer where I could set the
language, but on reflection the way it is in Calc is sensible.
Graham
On 5 Februa
On 02/05/2014 02:38 AM, Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 03/02/2014 17:47, Kracked_P_P---webmaster ha scritto:
On 02/03/2014 08:48 AM, Marcello Romani wrote:
Il 03/02/2014 13:21, IOmazic ha scritto:
Hi,
is it possible that you share this tools for windows? I will need to
install
it to around 450 pc,
Five and a half years ago, I had a question, two actually, about side
notes and footnotes.
The question on footnotes was this: can footnotes be placed in two
columns when the text is in a single column?
Then side notes: Is there a workable option to have side notes rather
than (or in addition to)
Le 04.02.2014 16:55, Brian Barker a écrit :
At 09:36 04/02/2014 +0100, Morel Bérenger wrote:
Is it possible to have a diff between 2 .docx files in libreoffice? I
am not fond of office suites, but at my work they sent me an outdated
document describing what I have to do, and when I asked abou
Le 04.02.2014 20:22, e-letter a écrit :
On 04/02/2014, Peter West wrote:
If you write the files out as .fodt (Flat XML) files from within LO,
you
will have straight XML files to compare.
Beyond that, you could get the tika-app.jar from the Apache Tika
project, which will let you extract pla
Le 04.02.2014 13:49, som a écrit :
On Tuesday, 4 February 2014 3:28 PM, "berenger.mo...@neutralite.org"
wrote:
> Hello.
Is it possible to have a diff between 2 .docx files in libreoffice?
i am not sure whether it works with docx but did you try the "compare
document" option under "edit" (E
At 09:20 05/02/2014 +0100, Graham Luffrum wrote:
In Writer I can set a language for a specific document, other than
the default LO language, so that it correctly spell-checks when I type.
It's important to realise that you can do better than this: you can
set different languages for different
I can reproduce the printing "issue" of it skipping back to the first
page instead of where you started the printing at, i.e. page 5 or 6.
I am using Debian 64-bit downloaded from LO running on a Ubuntu 12.04LTS
system.
I have several printers installed - Epson Aritsan-810, Canon MG5400,
Can
I use 4.1.4 on Ubuntu
I only had View / Print Layout, Web Layout when viewing an HTML file.
Then I played around with the LO Writer and Writer/Web options, plus the
Internet options.
After I added the "browser plug-in optional check-box, the page now had
View/HTML_Source.
I did not save the H
In Writer I can set a language for a specific document, other than the
default LO language, so that it correctly spell-checks when I type. I
cannot see how I can do this for a spreadsheet. To be more specific the LO
default language is UK English, but I write a lot in Slovak. So I have
installed
Bonjour,
je vous remercie de vos explications
Je dois récupérer le fichier normal.dot et faire l'essai
En tout cas merci de votre aide car je me sentais perdue !
Bonne journée
Message original
Sujet : [INTERNET] Re: Gridou
De : TomD [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
Pour
Bonjour,
je vous remercie de vos explications
Je dois récupérer le fichier normal.dot et faire l'essai
En tout cas merci de votre aide car je me sentais perdue !
Bonne journée
Message original
Sujet : [INTERNET] Re: Gridou
De : jdh111 [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
Po
Bonjour,
je vous remercie de vos explications
Je dois récupérer le fichier normal.dot et faire l'essai
En tout cas merci de votre aide car je me sentais perdue !
Bonne journée
Message original
Sujet : [INTERNET] Re: Gridou
De : Joseph Hogan [via Document Foundation Mail Archive]
63 matches
Mail list logo
