Le 2011-10-05 03:30, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Thanks to all the people who answered this. It seems whether LibreOffice
is partially or completely compliant to OASIS version 1.2 is more
complicated to establish for non-dev
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Thanks to all the people who answered this. It seems whether LibreOffice
is partially or completely compliant to OASIS version 1.2 is more
complicated to establish for non-dev people.
LibO is, like OOo, an extended
Thank you for the link, Thorsten (I can't CC you because Nabble doesn't allow
that)
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
LibO is, like OOo, an extended conformance producer/consumer of
ODF1.2, in its default setup. Choosing ODF format version 1.2 in
Tools-Options-Load/Save-General makes it produce
Hi :)
As Thorsten said, almost any case of non-conformance is considered a bug.
There are some bug-reports posted about specific examples of non-conformance
which get posted when people find examples of non-conformance and feel up to
the challenge of posting a bug-report about it.
Many
Tom wrote:
Many programs don't fully comply with their own specs.
The fact that many programs do that makes it correct?
Tom wrote:
OpenSource ones tend to try to fix that through bug-reports and such-like.
We often grumble when we find an example of a proprietary program, such as
Hi Tom
Tom wrote:
We are making a big fuss about very trivial differences.
How do you know they are trivial? In the document I referred previously in
this topic, after conversion to ODF, which took me a few hours, opening in
Abiword 2.9.1 or Textmaker 2012 (Beta) is useless.
The only
Le 2011-10-01 20:11, Marc Paré a écrit :
Hi Deni
Le 2011-09-30 21:17, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has been successfully
advanced to an OASIS
Standard,http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201109/msg00010.html.
The final ballot results
orcmid comment=below /
-Original Message-
From: Marc Paré [mailto:m...@marcpare.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 03:35
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: disc...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
[ ... ]
Thanks to all
...@documentfoundation.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
[ ... ]
Congrats to the team, great news! I was wondering if we were already
compliant with ODF1.2? If so we should market this along with
LibreOffice -- backwards compatibility being fully supported of course
: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: disc...@documentfoundation.org
Date: Monday, 3 October, 2011, 1:52
Marc asks: How conformant is LibreOffice as a producer and consumer
of the OASIS ODF 1.2 Standard?
I don't know how to assess that. I assume
Congratulations to all.
I believe that a solid open file format is extremely important.
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
Dennis, one curiosity since you were one of the editors: I assume you
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Saturday, 1 October, 2011, 10:39
Congratulations to all.
I believe that a solid open file format is extremely important.
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Tom Davies wrote:
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I
think OpenOffice was using it for quite a long time before that too. I
think the only program that still uses the older 1.1 or 1.0 formats is
MS Office 2010. I think Google-docs,
Pedro wrote (01-10-11 11:39)
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
Yes. Of course, some content (from the new standard) may be wrong.
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
--
For unsubscribe
Cor Nouws wrote:
Pedro wrote (01-10-11 11:39)
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
Yes. Of course, some content (from the new standard) may be wrong.
Excellent! More Kudos to all that were
On 10/01/2011 02:39 AM, Pedro wrote:
Congratulations to all.
I believe that a solid open file format is extremely important.
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open a ODF 1.2 document?
Dennis, one curiosity since
-
From: Tom Davies [mailto:tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 04:56
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
Hi :)
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I think
OpenOffice was using
1.2 support to settle down and
the level of interoperability to be raised across the board.
-Original Message-
From: Pedro [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 05:16
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
Congratulations to all.
I believe that a solid open file format is extremely important.
Am I correct to assume that ODF 1.2 is backward compatible? I.e. an old
application will still be able to open
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Tom Davies wrote:
All releases of LibreOffice have used the 1.2 (Extended) by default. I
think OpenOffice was using it for quite a long time before that too. I
think the only program that still uses
. That's the extent of
the details I've seen.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 06:34
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
Cor Nouws wrote:
Pedro wrote (01-10
Dennis, thank you for all the answers.
Sincerely, I'm surprised that you used Writer to edit a 1200 pages document.
I had to submit a 51 page report in Word and it was an absolute nightmare...
(BTW opening the same document in LO 3.4.3 shows how far cross-compatibility
still is :) )
Since ODF
: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
Dennis, thank you for all the answers.
Sincerely, I'm surprised that you used Writer to edit a 1200 pages document.
I had to submit a 51 page report in Word and it was an absolute nightmare...
(BTW opening the same document in LO 3.4.3 shows how far cross
...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 10:36
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] Re: OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 Approved
A while back, Microsoft offered a warranty with regard to ODF 1.2 support. I
believe it is contingent on ISO standardization occurring
Hi Deni
Le 2011-09-30 21:17, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit :
The OASIS ODF 1.2 Committee Specification 01 has been successfully advanced to an
OASIS
Standard,http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201109/msg00010.html.
The final ballot results for approval of OASIS Standard ODF 1.2 is
25 matches
Mail list logo
