Hallo Leute,
Seit gut sechs Wochen hühner ich hier mit apache2, php5 und CSS herum
und bin am suchen weil es nicht funktioniert...
Hier eine Muster Seite:
[ STDIN ]---
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN
Hallo Michelle,
kann gut sein, dass die MIME types für eine *.css Datei in der
Konfiguration nicht existieren.
Meine css Dateien werden, wenn ich sie direkt aufrufe als text/css
ausgeliefert.
In meiner /etc/apache2/apache2.conf Konfigurationsdatei (welche kaum
von der Standartkonfiguration
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Hallo Leute,
Seit gut sechs Wochen hühner ich hier mit apache2, php5 und CSS herum
und bin am suchen weil es nicht funktioniert...
Hier eine Muster Seite:
apache2 sendet die Datei als text/plain weshalb sie von den OSS
browsern nicht als CSS erkannt wird...
I have been working on this, reading the documentation, googled, but
haven't found the solution:
I administrate foo.bar.edu.my. Until now, it is one CMS. In future, we
want to use more, so I tried vhosts.
This is what I added to hhtpd.conf:
diff httpd.conf.novirtual httpd.conf
Uwe Dippel wrote:
I administrate foo.bar.edu.my. Until now, it is one CMS. In future, we
want to use more, so I tried vhosts.
This is what I added to hhtpd.conf:
VirtualHost *
ServerName foo.bar.edu.my
DocumentRoot /var/www/htdocs
/VirtualHost
Now, 2ndfoo.bar.edu.my
Davide Bianchi wrote:
What is 'foo.bar.edu.my'?
I simply didn't want to invite too many people; it is a publicly
accessible FQDN.
And what is the httpd.conf BEFORE the
changes?
I was afraid, it might be too long. Now it is attached.
Uwe
# $OpenBSD: httpd.conf,v 1.19 2006/02/22
Uwe Dippel wrote:
I simply didn't want to invite too many people; it is a publicly
accessible FQDN.
Yes, exactly, it is a PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE url, and the fast way to test
something is just to look at it. So why hiding it?
And what is the httpd.conf BEFORE the
changes?
I was afraid, it
At the bottom of each message you receive from the list it tells you how
to unsubscribe. This is called an idiot filter. Hi idiot.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 14:37 -0700, Xpert Advice wrote:
Hi guys i've been trying to unsubscribe this is my 3rd time..please
please unsubscribe me!
Tianja
Accept-Charset, Accept-Language, and Content-Type are the same in all
cases. Moreover, I think that is no related to the encoding supported by the
server, is about the encoding, languages and type of files supported -or
preferred- by the browser.
An example:
Host: localhost
User-Agent:
I have just installed an Apache 2.2.9 and it has exactly the same
behavior...
2008/9/24 #V[Á]lentín [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accept-Charset, Accept-Language, and Content-Type are the same in all
cases. Moreover, I think that is no related to the encoding supported by the
server, is about the
Davide Bianchi wrote:
Yes, exactly, it is a PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE url, and the fast way to test
something is just to look at it. So why hiding it?
Okay, no problem. If this can be of any help?
http://coit.uniten.edu.my
We are running the old version now, to have the current content
Uwe Dippel wrote:
We are running the old version now, to have the current content accessible.
Whenever I try to see that URL, I get a 302 redirecting me to /v2/,
maybe that is the problem. How about setting THAT as your DocumentRoot
instead of plain-old /var/www/htdocs ?
Davide
--
Gentlemen,
Bonjour,
je désire faire de l'authentification par certificat. Ma configuration
est la suivante :
reverse_proxy : apache 2.0.52
Location /uploadcrt/
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLOptions +ExportCertData +FakeBasicAuth +StrictRequire
+StdEnvVars
RequestHeader
Close, but no cigar. This is a multi-process apache waking up one of its
children.
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/InternalDummyConnection
OK, a variation to the question: I'm getting that annoying
williams - - [24/Sep/2008:14:46:03 +0200] GET //gfx/arrow.gif HTTP/1.0
200 62 -
williams - -
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:49 +0200, Krist van Besien wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Michelle Konzack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is the first time I have found the message in the
[ '/home_www/.Vallendor/logs/access.log' ]--
[2008-09-05
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:55 +0200, Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski wrote:
Close, but no cigar. This is a multi-process apache waking up one of its
children.
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/InternalDummyConnection
OK, a variation to the question: I'm getting that annoying
williams - -
Hi,
I would like to have different urls targeting the same webapp on Tomcat.
I'm using mod_jk 1.2.23.
I have two urls : http://myhost/mywebapp1/index.do and
http://myhost/mywebapp2/index.do.
Now I want these urls to target the same tomcat webapp.
Incoming requests on /mywebapp1 and /webapp2
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:17:11 -0700
Gordon Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looked like 'early' might have
some chance of removing the original Expires without disturbing the
mod_expires addition.
Not a chance. It happens long before the proxy has been
contacted, let alone sent you an
How to stop that? And not stop as ignore, but stop as have the server
not
do that (running 2.2.3 for the moment)?
Stop google from indexing your site?
http://www.robotstxt.org/faq/prevent.html
LOL, funny :D
Seriously though, while it's not an enormous load, dummy connections start
creeping
Marcin 'Rambo' Roguski wrote:
Seriously though, while it's not an enormous load, dummy connections start
creeping out after several weeks- I was shocked that, when I had to enable
logging for local requests a few hours, these messages were about 90% of
the log.
This is why you usually don't
Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:17:11 -0700
Gordon Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looked like 'early' might have
some chance of removing the original Expires without disturbing the
mod_expires addition.
Not a chance. It happens long before the proxy has been
contacted, let alone
Hi,
We've been using Apache 2.0 in a reverse proxy setup for a number of
years now, using both mod_proxy and
mod_rewrite to perform various types of URL rewriting. We are still
using the prefork model.
Over the past years, the number of sites that we are reverse proxying
has grown to over 100.
Hi All,
Has anybody tried Apache on CentOS?Please let me know if any issues are
being faced.Looks like it is very similar to Red-Hat 4.0.
Thanks
-A
Arnab,
You can find more information on how distros organise config files here:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DistrosDefaultLayout
Arnab Ganguly wrote:
Hi All,
Has anybody tried Apache on CentOS?Please let me know if any issues are
being faced.Looks like it is very similar to Red-Hat 4.0.
I was trying to resolve this issue for over month.
This mailing list is my last change before I switch back to IIS.
Experts Exchange could not solve this.
I'm running Apache 2.2.9 on Windows 2003 with mod_security, openssl and
PHP all behind Cisco 515E Pix with 5000 connections allowed.
I tried:
AuthLDAPBindDN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the results are the same. The apache_user is able to bind and complete the
lookup but then fails and the browser reports a 500 Internal Server Error.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Chris Covington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
I scanned the various sites and even the users@httpd.apache.org archives
but could not find much. There is this one comment about upgrading the
libtool but that did not help. Any links/url to that archived
discusssion will be very helpful.
Thanks.
Sukarna
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I scanned the various sites and even the users@httpd.apache.org archives
but could not find much. There is this one comment about upgrading the
libtool but that did not help. Any links/url to that archived
discusssion will be very helpful.
Search HP site for
Me too.
So at least there is nothing special to your system.
I finished installing Apache 2.2.9 on my Windows XP SP2 (German) laptop.
I created a file called valentín.jpg in my document root and tried to
access it with Firefox, and I get a 403 forbidden response.
I also get the same
Bonjour.
It looks like you are trying to send HTTPS data to your server, on a
port not prepared to understand HTTPS.
Autrement dit, je crois que votre serveur recoit du protocole encrypté
HTTPS, sur un port qui n'attend que du HTTP en clair.
(et j'ai aussi l'impression que vous seriez
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a file called valentín.jpg in my document root and tried to
access it with Firefox, and I get a 403 forbidden response.
GET http://zaphod/valent%EDn.jpg -- 403 Forbidden
On modern windows, I don't think
2008/9/24 Gilles Bachmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bonjour,
je désire faire de l'authentification par certificat. Ma configuration est
la suivante :
reverse_proxy : apache 2.0.52
Location /uploadcrt/
SSLVerifyClient require
SSLOptions +ExportCertData +FakeBasicAuth
So... maybe there is no solution? :( Fuck. Well... one more reason to
migrate to Linux definitely :S .
2008/9/24 Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:42 PM, André Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I created a file called valentín.jpg in my document root and tried to
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:40 PM, #V[Á]lentín [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... maybe there is no solution?
If it's only a few URLs, you might be able to use mod_rewrite to map
from the singlebyte to the utf-8.
--
Eric Covener
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not a good idea in my case, because they are dynamic content that could have
characters like á, é, ì... I did not apply restrictions to this because in
Linux it works fine, and the important think is that the application works
in Linux (Windows is only the system I use to work... not the
André Warnier wrote:
I created a file called valentín.jpg in my document root and tried to
access it with Firefox, and I get a 403 forbidden response.
All filenames on unix are whatever arbitrary characters happen to relate
to those names. So for files named in utf-8, they must be %escaped
I still think that there is an Apache 2.x + Windows related problem...
because, as I said before, with Apache 1.3 + Windows I had no problems:
With Apache 1.3, if I try to get a file called /í.JPG I could do it asking
for /%ED.JPG to the server, and this works perfectly.
and *the file is
Davide Bianchi wrote:
Whenever I try to see that URL, I get a 302 redirecting me to /v2/,
maybe that is the problem. How about setting THAT as your DocumentRoot
instead of plain-old /var/www/htdocs ?
Tried it, but doesn't help.
Sorry, let's take a break on this problem. The future and
Currently I have an runtime environment variable to tell if a client
want keepalive or not, specified by their cookie value,
e.g.
RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} ^.*NO_KEEPALIVE=TRUE.*$
RewriteRule ^.*$ - [E=NO_KEEPALIVE:1]
Is it possible, based on the environment variable to runtime disable
the
39 matches
Mail list logo
