On 11/13/2009 12:29 PM, Philip Wigg wrote:
NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.47:443
NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.129:443
You can't use name based virtual hosting with SSL. Try these lines
out. You need to make sure you have a Listen directive for those
IP/port combinations though.
Cheers,
Phil.
Hello all,
I have a question about the use of AuthUserFile of mod_auth module
together with mod_userdir in apache 2.2.14
I have created this .htaccess file in the public_html directory
AuthType Basic
AuthName "Members Only"
AuthUserFile ~arisg/.htpasswd
Require valid-user
I'm also using mod
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Krist van Besien
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Randy Paries wrote:
>> also i have this in my httpd
>> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.101:80
>> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.106:80
>> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.101:443
>
> You probably don't need these.
>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Randy Paries wrote:
> also i have this in my httpd
> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.101:80
> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.106:80
> NameVirtualHost 216.186.190.101:443
You probably don't need these.
I asume you have your one SSL host on 216.186.190.101 and another on
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Randy Paries wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Krist van Besien
> this is how i have it set up.
> when i generate the CSR do i need to do something special to bind the
> CSR to a specific IP?
No.
>
>
> ServerAdmin webmas...@unitnet.com
> DocumentRo
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 05:29:07PM +, Philip Wigg wrote:
> > NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.47:443
> > NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.129:443
>
> You can't use name based virtual hosting with SSL. Try these lines
> out. You need to make sure you have a Listen directive for those
> IP/port combinations t
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:31:50PM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> >
> >
>
> > When I visit https://virtual.host2/ I get:
> >
> > SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.
> >
> > (Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)
> >
>
> My guess is that your actually receving t
I just found that using the same value of AuthName for each application seems
to solve my problem. Is it the right way to go?
From: Yungwei Chen [mailto:yung...@resolvity.com]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:00 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us...@httpd] Authenticate each user once fo
>
>
> When I visit https://virtual.host2/ I get:
>
> SSL received a record that exceeded the maximum permissible length.
>
> (Error code: ssl_error_rx_record_too_long)
>
My guess is that your actually receving this connection on an
interface not listed in any of your vhosts, so it's handled as
> NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.47:443
> NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.129:443
You can't use name based virtual hosting with SSL. Try these lines
out. You need to make sure you have a Listen directive for those
IP/port combinations though.
Cheers,
Phil.
--
I have one physical server with two IP addresses. I created
VirtualHosts for each:
NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.47:443
NameVirtualHost 192.168.1.129:443
ServerName virtual.host1
DocumentRoot /var/www/html2
ErrorLog logs/ssl_error2_log
CustomLog logs/ssl_request2_log \
"%t
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Randy Paries wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Krist van Besien
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Randy Paries wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> i have a box with two domains
>>> CentOS release 5.3
>>> Server version: Apache/2.2.3
>>>
>>> initially the box
* Yungwei Chen [2009-11-13 17:39]:
> The proxy server also needs to forward some requests (/nagios) to
> another internal apache server. Any suggestions in this case?
Exclude those from the proxy pass?
-peter
-
The official User
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Sandro Tosi [mailto:sandro.t...@register.it]
> Envoyé : vendredi 13 novembre 2009 16:49
> À : users@httpd.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [us...@httpd] LDAP: ldap_set_option failed. Could not set
> LDAP_OPT_X_TLS to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_HARD
>
> Just to follow this up for
Brian Mearns wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM, David Henderson
wrote:
I would vote to make it a module over a patch due to Brian Mearns making a
good point about it possibly not moving beyond the IEFT. At least a modular
design can just be dropped from the operation of the server wit
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Yungwei Chen wrote:
> My question is: How can I tell the reverse proxy server to authenticate each
> user just once in this case?
It authenticates you on every request, but your browser doesn't bother
to prompt you when something is a sub-location of where you pr
The proxy server also needs to forward some requests (/nagios) to another
internal apache server. Any suggestions in this case?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Schober [mailto:peter.scho...@univie.ac.at]
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:18 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:15 AM, David Henderson
wrote:
> I would vote to make it a module over a patch due to Brian Mearns making a
> good point about it possibly not moving beyond the IEFT. At least a modular
> design can just be dropped from the operation of the server without having
> to rem
* Yungwei Chen [2009-11-13 17:00]:
>
>Order Deny,Allow
>Deny from all
>Allow from ...
>ProxyPasshttps://111.111.111.111/rpt
>ProxyPassReverse https://111.111.111.111/rpt
>ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain 111.111.111.111 100.100.100.100
>
I would vote to make it a module over a patch due to Brian Mearns making
a good point about it possibly not moving beyond the IEFT. At least a
modular design can just be dropped from the operation of the server
without having to remove code from the core of the project (and network
admins havi
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Does Apache intend to add support for Googles recently announced SPDY
protocol?
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
Patches welcome! Or in this case, maybe a module.
--
Nick Kew
---
Hi,
I have a reverse proxy server that forwards to requests to an internal apache
server. Here's the configuration on how the reverse proxy server works.
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from all
Allow from ...
ProxyPasshttps://111.111.111.111/rpt
ProxyPassRev
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Mike Cardwell
wrote:
> Does Apache intend to add support for Googles recently announced SPDY
> protocol?
>
> http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
>
> --
> Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
> Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Compa
Just to follow this up for people that might have the same problem: it
turns out it was because
- php was *not* compiled with ldap options
- php was loaded *before* mod_ldap and modp_authnz_ldap
A simple solution was to import mod_{authnz,}_ldap before php. The right
solution though is to add
After investigating this protocol, I agree that this would make a fine
addition to the worlds greatest web server!
Mike Cardwell wrote:
Does Apache intend to add support for Googles recently announced SPDY
protocol?
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
-
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:29 AM, Krist van Besien
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:15 AM, Randy Paries wrote:
>> Hello,
>> i have a box with two domains
>> CentOS release 5.3
>> Server version: Apache/2.2.3
>>
>> initially the box only had one IP and domain.
>>
>> I went and got a SSL cert for
Does Apache intend to add support for Googles recently announced SPDY
protocol?
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/spdy/spdy-whitepaper
--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
Technical Blog: https://secure
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Francois Pernet
wrote:
> Ok I can also post this question on openldap forum, but :
> - my main question is : is there anybody 's running wilcard certificates for
> LDAPs authentication under Apache ?
> - configuration for openldap is different than inside the mod_l
Ok I can also post this question on openldap forum, but :
- my main question is : is there anybody 's running wilcard certificates for
LDAPs authentication under Apache ?
- configuration for openldap is different than inside the mod_ldap (only few
directives in mod_ldap) so what if I can make it
* Francois Pernet [2009-11-13 09:12]:
> B) Tests with OpenLdap
[...]
> Doesn't work.
I guess then you'd better get this working on its own, before
continuing with httpd (it's certainly easier to debug LDAP connections
with a full blown LDAP command line tool),
-peter
Hello:
I have a weird problem with Apache and Windows 2003 Server that I haven't been
able to figure out:
HP Proliant DL580 G5
Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard x64
Apache 2.2.11
With that configuration, if I double-click "My PC", "Manage" and I go to "Disk
manage", an error is given: "Unable to
IP based virtual hosting will help you. read thru this
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/vhosts/ip-based.html
also you can have 2 include file with different IP listening and map there in
the include file, to make it easy to maintenance.
also can you paste your httpd.conf file
thanks
-suresh
Hi,
you are right... more details ...
I must also specify that apache in SSL (https) is working fine with
these certificates ...I do not say this is an apache problem, but more
on the ldap module and certainly on the libraries under ...
A) Apache
Syntax inside Apache :
LDAPTrustedMode SS
33 matches
Mail list logo
