Re: [us...@httpd] mod_fcgid (HEAD) spewing too much processes, please increase FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION; no documentation/guidance available on FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION

2010-02-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:32 PM, PGNet Dev pgnet.dev+apa...@gmail.com wrote: At, e.g., launch of a second app @ server, logs show only,        == /var/log/apache2/error_log ==        [Tue Feb 23 19:56:58 2010] [warn] mod_fcgid: too much processes, please increase FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION Since

[us...@httpd] Performance drop on Solaris 10U8 intel platfom

2010-02-24 Thread Luc Bastiaenssen
Since our last upgrade to Solaris 10U8 on a Sun Fire X4200(2 cores, 8GB memory) and Sun Fire X4450 (16 cores, 36GB memory), we notice a serious apache performance drop. Especially when you disable the keepalive directive, web pages seems to hang for a moment before completing. The following

Re: [us...@httpd] Can I have 2 httpd servers running on 2 different ports?

2010-02-24 Thread Tommy M. McGuire
Yes, you can[1]; you'll need to use different port numbers (or limit them to different IP addresses) and there is a PID file (or lock file, I cannot remember at the moment) that has to be different. The only changes you need are in the configuration and startup scripts. [1] We have an OpenSSO

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_fcgid (HEAD) spewing too much processes, please increase FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION; no documentation/guidance available on FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION

2010-02-24 Thread PGNet Dev
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Since changing FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION to 4096 didn't help, I guess you've encountered some sort of defect that causes a false detection of too many processes.  Although it is not going to solve your problem, we can improve

[us...@httpd] /index auto expansion to /index.html

2010-02-24 Thread Roland Kölbel
Hello! i have a problem with my Apache/2.2.9 (Debian). When i enter http://domain.com/index; i get no 404 as i would expect, but http://domain.com/index.html; get's served. This was not an issue with an older apache version. Does anyone now how to prevent this behaviour? Thank you! Roland

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_fcgid (HEAD) spewing too much processes, please increase FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION; no documentation/guidance available on FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION

2010-02-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:50 AM, PGNet Dev pgnet.dev+apa...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Since changing FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION to 4096 didn't help, I guess you've encountered some sort of defect that causes a false detection of too

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_fcgid (HEAD) spewing too much processes, please increase FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION; no documentation/guidance available on FCGID_MAX_APPLICATION

2010-02-24 Thread PGNet Dev
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: sorry for the duplicate questions np :-) I opened https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48811 to track this issue, in lieu of discussing an obvious bug here; you probably want to add yourself to the cc list

Re: [us...@httpd] Can I have 2 httpd servers running on 2 different ports?

2010-02-24 Thread Sheryl
bob wrote: Just give the servers different names. apache2 and apache2-different_port. Means you have to compile each server with that name and your server with the not 80 address will have a different Listen port in the httpd.conf file. Compiling individually is not necessary. We run dozens

Re: [us...@httpd] /index auto expansion to /index.html

2010-02-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Roland Kölbel roland.koel...@tu-cottbus.de wrote: Hello! i have a problem with my Apache/2.2.9 (Debian). When i enter http://domain.com/index; i get no 404 as i would expect, but http://domain.com/index.html; get's served. This was not an issue with an

Re: [us...@httpd] Can I have 2 httpd servers running on 2 different ports?

2010-02-24 Thread Paul McFerrin
Did you miss out on the VirtualHost * file?? With this, you only need one server to serve all of those hosts. They all will have same port numbers and you don't have to play with the PID file. I've been serving multiple hosts for years. - Paul Tommy M. McGuire wrote: Yes, you can[1];

[us...@httpd] question on htaccess

2010-02-24 Thread David Banning
I am wondering what the .htaccess syntax would be to redirect the following URL; www.smartstage.com/index.php?id=606 Something about the ? throws apache off. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP

[us...@httpd] IP address in access_log are always 0.0.0.0

2010-02-24 Thread Frank Chiulli
List: I believe that this is an apr or apr-utils issue. However, I could not find a mailing list for either one. If I need to ask this question elsewhere just let me know and I'll be gone. The web server is running Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 Nahant Update 6. Pretty much stock. I

Re: [us...@httpd] question on htaccess

2010-02-24 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, David Banning da...@skytracker.ca wrote: I am wondering what the .htaccess syntax would be to redirect the following URL; www.smartstage.com/index.php?id=606 Something about the ? throws apache off. http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RewriteQueryString -- Eric

[us...@httpd] Bugs or problem?

2010-02-24 Thread Ruiyuan Jiang
Hi, all Hi, all I found a problem on Apache v2.2.14. I down graded my Apache to v2.0.59 and tested. The problem does not exist on Apache v2.0.59. How do I file a bug report or fix request? Thanks. Ryan This message (including any attachments) is intended solely for the specific

Re: [us...@httpd] Bugs or problem?

2010-02-24 Thread Rich Bowen
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote: Hi, all Hi, all I found a problem on Apache v2.2.14. I down graded my Apache to v2.0.59 and tested. The problem does not exist on Apache v2.0.59. How do I file a bug report or fix request? Thanks. You start by telling us what the

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

2010-02-24 Thread Jonathan Zuckerman
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Rupert Reid isingl...@madasafish.comwrote: On 23 Feb 2010, at 21:43, Daniel Reinhardt wrote: -- From: Rupert Reid isingl...@madasafish.com Sent: 23 February, 2010 18:27 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject:

RE: [us...@httpd] Bugs or problem?

2010-02-24 Thread Ruiyuan Jiang
Well, I posted the problem two weeks ago and nobody responded. I will do it again. 1. First problem was with Apache 2.2.8 which it is fixed in 2.2.14. When I used HP precompiled Apache 2.2.8 (HPUX 11.23), the web sites are migrated from HPUX 11.11, Apache 2.0.59 to HPUX 11.23, Apache 2.2.8.

[us...@httpd] disable linking with libssl

2010-02-24 Thread Brad Cagle
upgrading from 1.3 to 2.2 I have configured apache 2.2.14 like: ./configure --disable-ssl (is disabled by default anyhow) however httpd is still linked with libssl varified by ldd: r...@s12:~/httpd-2.2.14# ldd httpd | grep ssl libssl.so.0 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.0 (0xb7dfb000) Im building

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

2010-02-24 Thread Daniel Reinhardt
-- From: Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com Sent: 24 February, 2010 21:08 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Rupert Reid isingl...@madasafish.comwrote: On 23

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

2010-02-24 Thread Jonathan Zuckerman
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Reinhardt crypto...@cryptodan.netwrote: -- From: Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com Sent: 24 February, 2010 21:08 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

2010-02-24 Thread Daniel Reinhardt
-- From: Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com Sent: 25 February, 2010 1:40 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Reinhardt crypto...@cryptodan.netwrote:

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 OS X 10.4 help

2010-02-24 Thread Lester Caine
Jonathan Zuckerman wrote: From: Rupert Reid isingl...@madasafish.com What I want to achieve is that when a browser clicks on http://