Re: [us...@httpd] Re: mod_cache caching cluster

2009-12-08 Thread Matthew Tice
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote: Matthew Tice mjt...@gmail.com writes: I was digging around with mod_memcache - I really like the idea but 1) it doesn't look like it's actively developed, and 2) I can't seem to get the caching to do what I want. Yes

Re: [us...@httpd] mod_cache caching cluster

2009-12-08 Thread Matthew Tice
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Francis GALIEGUE f...@one2team.com wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 20:08, Matthew Tice mjt...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was wondering if anyone has run across a means consolidating or clustering their cache? Currently we have 20 nodes that only serve up

[us...@httpd] mod_cache caching cluster

2009-12-07 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello, I was wondering if anyone has run across a means consolidating or clustering their cache? Currently we have 20 nodes that only serve up static content. Each node is configured with a 6G ramdisk (mod_disk_cache). This works *ok* except for a couple issues. 1) We experience intermittent

Re: [us...@httpd] Re: High load using memcache and 9G tmpfs

2009-07-20 Thread Matthew Tice
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Nicholas Sherlock n.sherl...@gmail.comwrote: Matthew Tice wrote: Currently we're migrating our static node cluster from 32bit OpenSuse 10.3 using the disk_cache_module on a 2G tmpfs to a 64bit CentOS 5.3 using the disk_cache module on a 9G tmpfs. After

[us...@httpd] High load using memcache and 9G tmpfs

2009-07-18 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello, Currently we're migrating our static node cluster from 32bit OpenSuse 10.3 using the disk_cache_module on a 2G tmpfs to a 64bit CentOS 5.3 using the disk_cache module on a 9G tmpfs. After pushing these CentOS nodes into production (and consequently adding many more requests) we started

[us...@httpd] Disallow CONNECT method

2009-05-21 Thread Matthew Tice
I can't seem to disallow the CONNECT method. Not matter what I try I keep getting a 502 error. Here's the output of my installation: # /opt/apache2/bin/httpd -v Server version: Apache/2.2.9 (Unix) Server built: Jun 18 2008 03:03:38 # /opt/apache2/bin/apachectl -t -D DUMP_MODULES Loaded

[us...@httpd] Re: Disallow CONNECT method

2009-05-21 Thread Matthew Tice
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Matthew Tice mjt...@gmail.com wrote: I can't seem to disallow the CONNECT method. Not matter what I try I keep getting a 502 error. Here's the output of my installation: We ended up moving our rewrite rule INTO the virtualhost directive: RewriteEngine

Re: htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)?

2008-12-17 Thread Matthew Tice
Okay, I tried that. Here are the results: [snip] Alright, I've figured it out. It's somewhat counter-intuitive (at least for me). It looks like the -l (limit) doesn't take into consideration the size of the directory. Example: # /opt/apache2/bin/htcacheclean -v -t -p/www/cache -l300M

Re: htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)?

2008-12-16 Thread Matthew Tice
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Morgan Gangwere 0.fracta...@gmail.comwrote: [snip] Could be that something is taking up more space and its not being caught. Either that or the -l says the maximum size for 1 file. Have you RTFM'd? Oh yeah, I've read the man page,

Re: htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)?

2008-12-16 Thread Matthew Tice
Exactly what have you done to start the daemon? have you nohup'd it? are you using an INIT script? It appears that you'd have to run nohup htcacheclean -d5 -r -l700M -i or some such There IS an option that you can do. you can do this: add to your crontab a command to change out your

Re: htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)?

2008-12-16 Thread Matthew Tice
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote: Have you tried -t? It looks like htcacheclean just counts the sizes of the files, but if you have a lot of empty directories, that might be taking up some space too. -t looks like it would clean that up. I thought so too

htcacheclean ignoring -l (limit)?

2008-12-15 Thread Matthew Tice
I'm running apache 2.2.9 on several nodes that serve static content only. I'm running into a problem where the disk cache is filling up (and subsequently problems serving the files). I've the following configuration: # /etc/fstab tmpfs /www/cache tmpfs auto,rw,size=1200M,nr_inodes=1M 0 0 # ps

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Find file in mod_disk_cache cache

2008-11-05 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello, I'm using mod_disk_cache for my static content. I need a way of deleting a cached entry manually. I've thrown together a shell script to do that (taking the name of the file as a command argument) but rolling through 2G worth of small jpeg's takes quite a while. I was wondering if anyone

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Find file in mod_disk_cache cache

2008-11-05 Thread Matthew Tice
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Matthew Tice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm using mod_disk_cache for my static content. I need a way of deleting a cached entry manually. I've thrown together a shell script to do that (taking the name of the file as a command argument) but rolling

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite all but one page

2008-04-09 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello, I feel like this is an easy one - but it's throwing me off. I have my webserver behind a netscaler load balancer. The netscaler handles the SSL traffic and redirects the decrypted traffic to port 81. I need to redirect all traffic except a certain page. The rewrite rule I have is this:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite all but one page

2008-04-09 Thread Matthew Tice
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80 RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/+partners/+video\.php RewriteRule ^/partners(.*)$ https://testvideo101.example.com/partners$1[R,NC]https://testvideo101.example.com/partners$1%5BR,NC%5D Mike Thanks Mike, that did it. One question. Are the '+' necessary? That

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] upgrade mod_rewrite

2008-02-07 Thread Matthew Tice
mod_rewrite is versioned with apache, and the only (supported) way to upgrade it is to upgrade apache. What, exactly, is the reported problem? I'm guessing it is CVE-2006-3747, in which case it can be fixed by moving to 1.3.37 or higher. (But going to 2.2 is not a bad idea, in general.)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] upgrade mod_rewrite

2008-02-06 Thread Matthew Tice
Hello all, I'm currently using apache 1.3.33. Because of some auditing concerns I was told I need to upgrade mod_rewrite. Problem is that I really don't know what that entails. I'm not sure how to determine what version I'm using (if it's not tied to apache 1.3). Do I need to upgrade my