as back in July and
> we will stop making public comments or security advisories once we have
> fewer than three active project members attending to this legacy version.
>
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2017 06:47, "chetan jain" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> As apache 2.2.x is E
Hi All,
As apache 2.2.x is EOL, I need to upgrade to httpd 2.4.x version but I am
not able to verify anywhere if it is supported/tested configuration with
Centos 6 OS?
Any inputs are highly apprrleciated.
Thanks,
Chetan
I tried it with the host port combination and somehow the web page does not
come up at all, could not keep it that way for longer period to
troubleshoot it as it was being used.
--Chetan
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:21 AM, chetan jain wrote:
> Thanks for the Reploy Luca.
>
> so i shall b
t a big expert but I believe that what
> Eric is saying is that if you want to use a different SSL configuration on
> one VirtualHost you can with the constraint that the IP:PORT (stated in
> ) is unique and not used in another VirtualHost block.
>
> Luca
>
> 2017-07-25 12:01 GM
ng but it is very difficult
> to debug only from your description. If you can put your configuration in
> https://apaste.info/ it would be great, otherwise I'd suggest to reach
> out to the folks in #httpd (IRC Freenode) to get some live help.
>
> Luca
>
>
> 2017-
Hi All,
Any more input on this?
--Chetan
On 21 Jul 2017 10:40 p.m., "chetan jain" wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> We have a different server alias for each of the host, It does get
> honoured that is how requests go to correct sites.
>
> It
ch is
loaded and rest are ignored, trying to seek confirmation if that is
correct...and what can be done to achieve the needful
On 21 Jul 2017 5:09 p.m., "Eric Covener" wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:37 AM, chetan jain wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have an Apache
only one of
them, how can i achieve this?
any help is highly appreciated.
--Chetan Jain
,
Chetan Jain.
other hyperlink from first page, it always lands up on the app1
(This is with the original configuration i had posted)
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:18 PM, chetan jain wrote:
> niether of it works, for some unknows reason it tried to look for /app1
> under document root.
>
>
>
> On
the url-part
> (/app/WebObjects/app.woa) to another string (like
> /app/webObjects/app1|2.woa) that is different for each backend.
>
> Regards,
> Tobias
>
>
> Am 29.12.2015 um 14:43 schrieb chetan jain:
>
> Thanks Tobias,
>
> The problem with that would be, I won
niether of it works, for some unknows reason it tried to look for /app1
under document root.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >
> > You possibly need something like:
> >
> > RewriteRule ^/app1/(.*)
> > http://host_
Thanks Tobias,
The problem with that would be, I won't be able to ProxyPass with path in
Location bock.
--Chetan
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Tobias Adolph wrote:
> Hi Jain,
>
> did you configure those in the same virtualhost-Block?
>
> Am 18.12.2015 um 14:35 schrieb c
Any pointers are highly appreciated.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:05 PM, chetan jain wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a scenario where i have different instances of the same application
> deployed on different boxes and we call those instances as app1, app2.
>
> and the actual URL for
it ends up going to app1 only
reason i think is, this part ( /app/WebObjects/app.woa ) of the URL is
common for both and may be webserver gets confused whom to forward the
request.
can someone help to get around this problem?
Regards,
Chetan Jain
15 matches
Mail list logo
