Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-20 Thread Mark A. Craig
, but before they are zipped, it to produce statistics from the access.log data. For example, how many times pages are being visited and from where. Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows From: Phillip Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Norman Peelman wrote: I am unsure of what would be causing your Unicode issues, sorry. That being said.. i've heard/read that there are issues with rotatelogs on W32 platforms. I have successfully used rotatelogs on my old XP box after alot of hassle. What I found for me was that I had to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
the logs, but I'd understandably like to automate it. Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 08:37:29 AM Norman

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Dragon
Mark A. Craig wrote: So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4 admins using to rotate your logs? If the piping mechanism is broken, at least in the Windows binary, then what other technique(s) are people using? Task Scheduler with a batch or CMD file? So far I've

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Phillip Hamilton
- From: Dragon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 1:02 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows Mark A. Craig wrote: So this leads me to ask again, what are all of you successful 2.2.4 admins using to rotate your

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Mark A. Craig
PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows From: Phillip Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:50:08 AM I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement: Apache holds only a tiny share of Windows servers. Apache holds a very large share

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-18 Thread Phillip Hamilton
sharing. -Original Message- From: Mark A. Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 2:01 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows Philip, do you use a scheduled CMD file to gracefully kill the server

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-16 Thread Mark A. Craig
out, I don't. Now you know why I'm asking for help with this. What exactly about my syntax (see previous post with sample) is so broken that it could cause such a non sequitur error? Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-16 Thread Norman Peelman
... if I comment them out, I don't. Now you know why I'm asking for help with this. What exactly about my syntax (see previous post with sample) is so broken that it could cause such a non sequitur error? Mark Original Message Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-15 Thread Vincent Bray
On 14/09/2007, Mark A. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running in Windows 2000. WHen I try to configure it the server fails to start and bitches about Unicode characters on line 1 of httpd.conf that aren't actually there. I've

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2, rotatelogs.exe, and Windows

2007-09-13 Thread Mark A. Craig
I want to use rotatelogs.exe to archive my logs with Apache 2.2 running in Windows 2000. WHen I try to configure it the server fails to start and bitches about Unicode characters on line 1 of httpd.conf that aren't actually there. I've read the docs repeatedly, but it's not entirely explicit