> I'll chime in here a little :) Off hand, I can't think of anyone else
> who was building Apache 2.2.0 on Windows apart from wrowe and myself,
Steffen from Apachelounge provides compiled 2.2.x binaries.
(http://www.apachelounge.com, you have to register to be able to download
the binaries)
Joost
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:41:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> More to the point, anyone else could provide binaries if they so
> wished (within the project - Apache doesn't accept external binary
> contributions). Nobody in the project raised their hand, probably for
> similar reasons.
Schultz, Gary - COMM wrote:
I know there are great people out there building great Win32 Apache 2.2.x
binaries, but the problem is that some IT managers, like mine, want a stable
Win32 Apache from the Apache Software Foundation. So we will continue with
2.0.55 until the ASF releases a stable Win3
al Message-
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 6:50 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
Yevgen Borodin wrote:
> Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release?
> So tired of
--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote:
>
> > Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase
> > site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at
> any
> > given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15
> > thousand.
>
> 15k concurrent
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:44, Jaqui Greenlees wrote:
> Bondware, a hosting company I know, has a showcase
> site for their CMS script that is at a minimum at any
> given time 700 users, I have seen it peak at 15
> thousand.
15k concurrent database connections (erk)?
Or 15k including some database
--- Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 01 May 2006 13:04, Graham Frank wrote:
> > Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker
> peaks at 800 workers in
> > the daytime. I could definantly give event a
> whirl if I were willing to
> > place it onto a mission critical web server.
Sure, if I can find the time. I have the next couple months filled with travel
across the country.
Adios.
--Graham
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:32 am
Size: 830 by
I'll check it out tonight I suppose.
--Graham
-Original Message-
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 7:25 am
Size: 994 bytes
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Graham Frank wr
On Monday 01 May 2006 13:04, Graham Frank wrote:
> Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in
> the daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to
> place it onto a mission critical web server.
Come to ApacheCon, and see Colm's talk. AIUI he's h
On Monday 01 May 2006 12:52, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I can't reconcile your complaint Nick - he opened his comment that it's an
> experimental MPM. How did Graham's comment imply that he didn't understand
> it's still experimental?
My first paragraph was a reply (albeit speculative) to the
Graham Frank wrote:
Give it a whirl, ey? Oh how tempting ... Worker peaks at 800 workers in the
daytime. I could definantly give event a whirl if I were willing to place it
onto a mission critical web server.
Hell, why not? It wouldn't be the most psychotic thing I've done in recent
histor
aham
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
Date: Mon May 1, 2006 6:55 am
Size: 754 bytes
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Graham Frank wrote:
> What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core en
Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote:
What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core
enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out
of the production circuit?
IMO removing the "experimental" branch from normal modules
was a
Graham Frank wrote:
What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core enhancements,
but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out of the
production circuit?
Primarilly because it's bleeding edge. Not serrated-knife style as perchild
was - but simply not widely adopte
Yevgen Borodin wrote:
Why couldn't there be a stable 2.2.2 Win32 Apache release?
So tired of random bugs in 2.0.55... :(
Because Apache HTTP Server is a source code development project.
We don't exist to help users of any specific platform.
Binaries are provided at the convenience of a contri
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:15, Graham Frank wrote:
> What about the event MPM? They list it as changed in the core
> enhancements, but it is still an experimental MPM. What's keeping it out
> of the production circuit?
Feel free to try it. AIUI the main limitation is that it may not work
with con
: dev@httpd.apache.org; users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the relea
ECTED] Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.2 of the Apache HTTP
Server ("Apache"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.2 of the Apache HTTP
Server ("Apache").
We consider this release to be the best ver
20 matches
Mail list logo
