Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache worker / PHP issue

2008-11-10 Thread Savio Dias
Hello, Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ? Thanks On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Savio Dias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am using Ubuntu 8.04. I have installed apache2 using apt-get, this installs

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache worker / PHP issue

2008-11-10 Thread André Warnier
Savio Dias wrote: Hello, Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ? Hi. What the Debian packager (through the apt-get program) and Eric are telling you, is that the PHP5 package removes mpm-worker and replaces it by mpm-prefork for a good reason. The good reason is probably that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache worker / PHP issue

2008-11-10 Thread Issac Goldstand
André Warnier wrote: Savio Dias wrote: Hello, Is there anyone who can help resolve this issue ? Hi. What the Debian packager (through the apt-get program) and Eric are telling you, is that the PHP5 package removes mpm-worker and replaces it by mpm-prefork for a good reason. The good

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache worker / PHP issue

2008-11-08 Thread Savio Dias
Hello, I am using Ubuntu 8.04. I have installed apache2 using apt-get, this installs the mpm-worker mode. However when i try to install php5 using apt-get, it removes the mpm-worker and installs prefork. I need to keep the worker mode intact..please suggest.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache worker / PHP issue

2008-11-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Savio Dias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am using Ubuntu 8.04. I have installed apache2 using apt-get, this installs the mpm-worker mode. However when i try to install php5 using apt-get, it removes the mpm-worker and installs prefork. I need to keep

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache + Windows + PHP

2007-05-02 Thread Marcos R. Cardoso
I've been using the following configuration on a web server here at work: Win2003 Server Apache 2.0.58 PHP 4.4.2 Until last week, I was doing the link between Apache and PHP through the DLL php4apache2.dll at the LoadModule section on httpd.conf. Now this link is being done through the Action

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Wesley Craft
Hello. I was unable to find an answer to this in the archives. I have a web server running Apache 1.3.37 and has thousands of pages named .html which are parsed for SSI tags. I am seem unable to configure apache to parse .html pages for both SSI tags AND php tags at the same time. However, in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 3/19/07, Wesley Craft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone help me with the configuration, or is this simply a limitation of the older version? It's a limitation of apache 1.3. Use 2.x. Joshua. - The official

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Wesley Craft
Bummer. We are in the middle of a migration to v2.0 that will take several months. Was hoping I could do this quickly, but shrug oh well. Thanks for the reply.. -Wes On 3/19/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/19/07, Wesley Craft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone help me with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 3/19/07, Wesley Craft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bummer. We are in the middle of a migration to v2.0 that will take several months. Was hoping I could do this quickly, but shrug oh well. Thanks for the reply.. Of course, the other response to this type of query is: why use SSI if you are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Wesley Craft
That does make sense, but I'm a one-person programming team. So with a [very] tight delivery schedule, I can't afford the time to trudge through the code and change all of my thousands of existing SSI tags to PHP. This is also considering that a good number of those SSI tags include overly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread Wesley Craft
How different is 2.2 from 2.0? My production servers are presently in-use for some tasks and are running 2.0, the latest in the red hat repo. I'm trying to make sure that my migration to 2.0 will upgrade easily to 2.2 when Red Hat releases it... -Wes On 3/19/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache parsing PHP 'and' SSI tags in v1.3?

2007-03-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Wesley Craft wrote: How different is 2.2 from 2.0? My production servers are presently in-use for some tasks and are running 2.0, the latest in the red hat repo. I'm trying to make sure that my migration to 2.0 will upgrade easily to 2.2 when Red Hat releases it... Then ask RedHat - they do

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache and php on windows

2007-01-29 Thread Sam Carleton
Is there any way to statically build PHP5 into any version of apache on Windows? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info. To

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache and php on windows

2007-01-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sam Carleton wrote: Is there any way to statically build PHP5 into any version of apache on Windows? 1. yes. 2. it's non-trivial. 3. it's possible to compile mod_php.c in, it's also possible to compile in all of mod_php.c and the php4ts.dll modules. The definition of static can vary. 4.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache and php on windows

2007-01-29 Thread Sam Carleton
On 1/29/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sam Carleton wrote: Is there any way to statically build PHP5 into any version of apache on Windows? 1. yes. 2. it's non-trivial. 3. it's possible to compile mod_php.c in, it's also possible to compile in all of mod_php.c and the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache and php on windows

2007-01-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Sam Carleton wrote: I was simply thinking that if I could statically link apache and php so that there was simply one executable, it would make packaging and distribution simpler for me. I could be wrong;) What you save in having one binary is mitigated by the fact that pushing out one

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and php

2006-10-23 Thread Javier Martinez
Is it posible to have PHP4 and PHP5 running on the same apache server. Somone have some link with info to make this?Thanks.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and php

2006-10-23 Thread Jonathan Villa
Compile 2 different versionsif running simultaneously/usr/local/php4/usr/local/php5and associate files differently for each version..php5.php4- Original Message -From: Javier Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thu, 11/2/2006 3:48pmTo: users@httpd.apache.orgSubject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and php

2006-10-23 Thread Javier Martinez
Thanks for the response, but can you be more explicit?I'm very new in apache and always have used it as "install and run" :PI have one webserver with an app in php4 running, and now my new project is using php5. I need both projects on same serverThanksPD: my pages are not saved like *.php4 or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and php

2006-10-23 Thread Dmitry Bakshaev
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 21:27:38 +0200 Javier Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the response, but can you be more explicit? I'm very new in apache and always have used it as install and run :P I have one webserver with an app in php4 running, and now my new project is using php5. I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 1.3.33, php 4.3.6, solaris 8 - file open problem?

2006-03-13 Thread Harald Falkenberg
Hallo, we are using apache 1.3.33 wiht php 4.3.6 on solaris 8. php is build with Oracle access. Everything works fine. Unefortunately we get from time to time problems to access the database just in side php. All other scripts work fine against the db. A reload of the same php page often works

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and php

2005-12-22 Thread mark student
Hi folks, I have a simple question. I'm running Apache 1.3.x and installed the pkgs CSWphp4cgi, CSWphp4mysql, and SFWmphp. Now, how do I configure Apache and/or PHP to display my little hello.php file in the browser? The browser doesn't display anything when I put in the URL. Help Yahoo! for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-07 Thread Joshua Kogut
Hey, also, I started having this problem too, it didn't start until I started using perl scripts in my cgi-bin. Hm. I wonder if perl sabotages php? All I did to fix it was reinstall the blasted server, Apache and Php only, left MySql intact, and then everything worked fine.On 11/7/05, Malka

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-07 Thread Malka Cymbalista
We tried reinstalling apache and php but it didn't help. Someone told me that the problem might be because of SSL but I don't know what to do to fix it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/7/2005 4:53 PM: Hey, also, I started having this problem too, it didn't start until I started using perl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-06 Thread Malka Cymbalista
It turns out that whenever the error occurs, there is a message in the error log saying that a file was not found. These files are indeed not found. But why should that cause the php not to open properly? And sometimes it does open properly? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/1/2005 6:01 PM:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-01 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: Joshua Kogut [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey guys, here's an analogy concerning Php and MP. You can go to a store, and you have $100 US to buy something to help you hammer nails. The logical choice is that you should buy a hammer right? It does what you need it to, and the shallow learning curve is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-01 Thread Joshua Kogut
It isn't that multipurpose tool couldn't do anything that the hammer could, it's just that the hammer did it with less work, less learning, and less frustration.On 11/1/05, Octavian Rasnita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Joshua Kogut [EMAIL PROTECTED]Hey guys, here's an analogy concerning Php and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-01 Thread Boysenberry Payne
Are there any errors in the error_log when the mishap happens? Boysenberry boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com On Nov 1, 2005, at 1:28 AM, Malka Cymbalista wrote: Thanks very much for your reply. I read the document you referred me to and it seems to me that it is for

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-01 Thread Boysenberry Payne
I understand, for me it was kind of like after having using a hammer for so long the nail gun feels good, you know ;) Boysenberry boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Joshua Kogut wrote: It isn't that multipurpose tool couldn't do anything that

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-11-01 Thread Joshua Kogut
The nail gun feesl *realy* good until you shoot youself in the foot with it a few times. :POn 11/1/05, Boysenberry Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I understand, for me it was kind of like after having using a hammer for so long the nail gun feels good, you know;)Boysenberryboysenberrys.com |

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-31 Thread Tom Cat
Check out http://www.linux-sottises.net/en_apache_install.php Using both PHP and mod_perl together has caused problems in the past (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/21/1720242), but I think they will play nicely now. FYI, I ditched mod_perl in favor of a PHP a while ago. If I really

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-31 Thread Joshua Kogut
I too have strayed from the the road of perl in favor of my new love. Php.On 10/31/05, Tom Cat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Check out http://www.linux-sottises.net/en_apache_install.phpUsing both PHP and mod_perl together has caused problems in the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-31 Thread Boysenberry Payne
That's funny I did the opposite, started with PHP and went to MP after a few years at PHP. Just out of curiosity, why would one go from MP to PHP? It seems like you're giving up a lot in the move. Boysenberry boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com On Oct 31, 2005, at 1:44 PM,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-31 Thread Octavian Rasnita
From: Boysenberry Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] That's funny I did the opposite, started with PHP and went to MP after a few years at PHP. Just out of curiosity, why would one go from MP to PHP? It seems like you're giving up a lot in the move. Boysenberry --- I have started with perl CGI, ModPerl,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-31 Thread Malka Cymbalista
Thanks very much for your reply. I read the document you referred me to and it seems to me that it is for Apache 1 and mod_perl 1. We are running apache 2 and mod_perl 2 and not all of the instructions are applicable. Do you have any idea how to do the installation of all these components using

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP

2005-10-30 Thread Malka Cymbalista
We are having a strange problem with our PHP sites and I was wondering of someone has any pointers to offer. We are running apache 2.0.55 with mod_perl 2.0.1 and php 4.3.3 and mod_ssl 2.0.55 on a Sun Solaris machine. Every now and then, when you click on a URL that is a php script, instead of

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP cause Internal Server Errors

2005-08-22 Thread Christopher Malton
Our organization's server, which is a Win32 box, has recently been causing Internal Server Errors and then, if left unattended,as it was over a weekend, it will crash completely. The problem, we think, is memory related. We only run PHP as a CGI and frequently execute MySQL queries. One of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache and PHP cause Internal Server Errors

2005-08-22 Thread Davide Bianchi
Christopher Malton wrote: Gateway Tower PC, Pentium 2 processor. 128MB RAM (We think. We know it's either 64 or 128) Win 98 SE PHPTriad installer installed: Apache 1.3.3 PHP 4.1.0 MySQL 3.?? I'd suggest to upgrade the machine and the software. Since someone already has an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Davide Bianchi
Bahya NASSR EDDINE wrote: I compiled apache-1.3.33 whith mod_ssl. Since I was unable to compile php unable to compile means? Maybe you miss something in your installation. Any idea please? It sounds like the version of PHP you installed isn't made for that version of Apache or you miss some

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Bahya NASSR EDDINE
Thank you for your response. --- Davide Bianchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : unable to compile means? Maybe you miss something in your installation. I receive an internal error: Segmentation fault message while compiling php, I think that this is due to memory. It sounds like the version of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache-1.3.33 php-4.2.2-17.rpm

2005-07-20 Thread Davide Bianchi
Bahya NASSR EDDINE wrote: I receive an internal error: Segmentation fault message while compiling php, I think that this is due to memory. Then your memory is bugged and you should replace it immediately. Davide - The