it could just be that the backbone for that area has other major fiber
users that take up that same bandwidth. if you can get to that location
and run some sort of speed upload/download test to see what your
_acctual_ speeds are then you can see if its really apache, or if the
machine is
you're being slightly unclear.
please explain the problem
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Morgan gangwere wrote:
you're being slightly unclear.
please explain the problem
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server
Project.
See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.
let me get this straight
a) do you run the server that you are having the problems with
b) is this server on another side of the net? or is your computer on the
SAME net?
-
The official User-To-User support forum of the
Morgan gangwere wrote:
let me get this straight
a) do you run the server that you are having the problems with
b) is this server on another side of the net? or is your computer on
the SAME net?
-
The official User-To-User
On 12/6/05, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any benchmarks out there that compare the performance
between Apache 2.0.x and the newly-released Apache 2.2.0?
I don't know, but I would be very surprised if there was any
measurable speed difference between the two unless you use mod_cache
Additonally, if your server is 486 and xeon, it isnt nesserary to talk about. ;)2005/12/7, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 12/6/05, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any benchmarks out there that compare the performance between Apache 2.0.x and the newly-released Apache
2.2.0?I don't
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
Here is the situation:
DNS has entry of
new CNAME bio-world.com
bio-world is hosted at 66.64.142.34(IIS) and then there is redirection for
new.bio-world.com to 66.64.142.35 where the new.bio-world.com apache.
Somehow if i enter in DNS new
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 July 2005 06:30
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 7/21/2005 at 11:41 AM Michael wrote:
Please check this address http://new.bio-world.com (this link is at my
site)I`m sure a lot of you
://192.168.1.15/bioworld/
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Malton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 8:20 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
Mike,
I have worked out that the DNS is resolving the hostname to the WRONG IP!
192.168.1.5
SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:45 AM
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
Christopher;
I do not think so.
new.bio-world.com is resolved correctly. The problem is that it makes a
redirect to http://192.168.1.15/bioworld/.
Some thoughts
Message-
From: Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 5:57 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
I`m sorry for providing wrong link to you guys but i`m on the lan and when i
typed in the address it was working and i forgot that i was on the lan
-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:16 PM
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
How can i maintain the new.bio-world.com name instead of that ip ?
Would that be the servername in httpd.conf ??
I have to revise my opinion about that now
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Thom Hehl wrote:
How much RAM? httpd and mysql are neither very large, but it sounds like
you've exhausted virtual memory and are swapping yourself to death on
your hard drive. Also, what speed is your hard drive.
It's far more likely to be the application than either
, 2005 2:48 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
My first guess would have been DNS... There are several directives to
prevent Apache from doing DNS lookups. Details in the doc.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Thom Hehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
and the
other is not.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
DNS would provide a longer delay I would think. At least if it were
unreachable. If DNS is unstable and not answering correctly
My first guess would have been DNS... There are several directives to prevent
Apache from doing DNS lookups. Details in the doc.
-ascs
-Original Message-
From: Thom Hehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:05 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL
How much RAM? httpd and mysql are neither very large, but it sounds like
you've exhausted virtual memory and are swapping yourself to death on
your hard drive. Also, what speed is your hard drive.
You probably shouldn't be running both of those with less than 256M of RAM.
Michael wrote:
I
P4 2.0 Ghz 512 MB RAM
swap total 1012 used 44 and emory used 320 total 502
- Original Message -
From: Thom Hehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Speed
How much RAM? httpd and mysql are neither very large
19 matches
Mail list logo
