Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Its strange but I have a such scheme and it is working for me on my test suite with kannel svn-r5173 :) The only different thig is that I route MT by prefix, not by smsc-id. Nevermind, with smsc-id it will be working too. # fake.conf group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = vasgw1 port = 12000

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Thanks. Is it also kannel based? Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 19:39, vinayak mv wrote: > > Dear Davor, > > There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which > has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Hi Stipe, Thanks for confirming. Yes, I would like to have more details about the mentioned product. Davor Sent from my iPad > On 22.9.2016, at 16:03, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: >> Hi, >> >> I realized yesterday that the reason the

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Dear Davor, There is also an alternative solution for SMPP Server i.e. vsmppbox ,which has more features compared to other smpp servers.you can find the details of that in http://www.evoxtel.com > On 22-Sep-2016, at 7:32 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > Am 21.09.2016 08:25,

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Am 21.09.2016 08:25, schrieb Davor Spasoski: Hi, I realized yesterday that the reason the allowed/preferred trickery doesn’t work is because opensmppbox doesn’t pass smsc-id dynamically. It’s either a static value using the route-to-smsc directive or it’s blank if this is omitted. The whole

RE: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

To: Davor Spasoski <davor.spaso...@onevip.mk> Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC Of course you have removed the # form those lines, right? Other than that, I cannot tell why it's not working for you. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Davor Spasoski <da

Re: Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Of course you have removed the # form those lines, right? Other than that, I cannot tell why it's not working for you. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Davor Spasoski wrote: > Hi, > > > > I’m trying to use opensmppbox and kannel to act as SMPP proxy. The SMSC >

Load balancing MT with preferred SMSC

Hi, I’m trying to use opensmppbox and kannel to act as SMPP proxy. The SMSC operator doesn’t allow direct connections and it has two SMSCs, one of which is preferred and the other handles traffic if only the preferred fails. But, both are always active, i.e. bearerbox is normally bound to

Load balancing of multiple Kannel servers

Hi All, I am having high volume of SMS(s) to be sent from Kannel ( say in Lacs). If I setup multiple Kannel server (say 5 server) then how do I achieve load balancing with those many servers. I have single playSMS in front end which will be connected to these Kannel servers. Any thoughts

Re: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic

Let me setup like that one smsc account on two kannel for MT load balancing. I will share the outcome. @Alex, we try to keep minimum sms queue on each kannel. This helps to minimize the sms stuck on queue. Also kannel has recent support with redis. I will test if that will help sharing queue

Re: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic

If you bind two sessions for single SMPP account, one session on each box you will get MO messages in round-robin fashion. Regards, Ghulam Mustafa On 01/29/2014 03:48 AM, Abdul Basit wrote: Let me setup like that one smsc account on two kannel for MT load balancing. I will share

SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic

Dear all, I am looking for SMPP load balancing solution for MT traffic. Kannel 1 / SMSC == Load Balancer (smpp proxy

RE: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic

What happens if you configure both Kannel 1 Kannel 2 with the same smsc configurations? From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Abdul Basit Sent: donderdag 23 januari 2014 19:43 To: users Subject: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic Dear all, I am looking

Re: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic

:43 To: users Subject: SMPP proxy for load balancing SMPP traffic Dear all, I am looking for SMPP load balancing solution for MT traffic. Kannel 1 / SMSC

Load Balancing Not work

I have two Binds and use the same smsc id. Load balancing can be achieved initially. After a few message sent, one bind seems to be suspended, but actually the status is online. No message route to this bind.   After I restart this bind using stop-smsc and start-smsc command,  this bind can

load balancing according to smsc and sender's mobile operator

Is there any method to balance the load between smscs according to sender's moblile operator. i want that reliance messages route via reliance smsc, airtel messages route via airtel smsc, vodafone messages route via vodafone smsc.what will i have to do for this implementation. Regards thanks in

kannel's load balancing when using multiple concurrent connections to the same SMSC with the same smsc_id and login

connections for sending SMS and 2 connections for receiving DLRs. I noticed from kannel's status kannel isn't load balancing properly between them: mysmsc[smsc]SMPP:smpp-provider.com:2775/0:login:NULL (online 623s, rcvd: sms 0 (0.00,0.00,0.00) / dlr 2559 (4.29,4.21,4.11), sent: sms 2559

Re: kannel's load balancing when using multiple concurrent connections to the same SMSC with the same smsc_id and login

Hi, I believe the load balance happens only in the sence that if one bind is busy sending an SMS and a new request comes, instead of queuing it, it goes to the second bind of the same name, rather than doing round-robin load balancing which seems to be what most people expect/assume. If your

Re: kannel's load balancing when using multiple concurrent connections to the same SMSC with the same smsc_id and login

the sence that if one bind is busy sending an SMS and a new request comes, instead of queuing it, it goes to the second bind of the same name, rather than doing "round-robin" load balancing which seems to be what most people expect/assume. If your sen

Re: kannel's load balancing when using multiple concurrent connections to the same SMSC with the same smsc_id and login

round-robin load balancing which seems to be what most people expect/assume. If your send rate is fairly low, then most messages will leave via the 1st bind. Regards, Kyriacos Sakkas On 04/04/2012 13:58, spameden wrote: I'm using latest kannel from SVN with sqlbox in scheme: Box

Load-balancing for outgoing SMS

Hi, I have 2 SMSC connections with an operator, A and B. I need to use both of these connections to send outgoing SMS-MT. My sendsms-user configuration is following: group = sendsms-user username = 710user password = 710pass forced-smsc = A #default-smsc = A;B max-messages = 5 concatenation =

RE: Load-balancing for outgoing SMS

You can use forced-smsc = A but give your two SMSC connections the same smsc id (e.g. smsc-id = A in group = smsc). == Rene From: users-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of ha...@aeon.pk Sent: Monday, 13 September, 2010 17:49 To: kannel users Subject: Load

Re: Load-balancing for outgoing SMS

users *Subject:* Load-balancing for outgoing SMS Hi, I have 2 SMSC connections with an operator, A and B. I need to use both of these connections to send outgoing SMS-MT. My sendsms-user configuration is following: group = sendsms-user username = 710user password = 710pass

Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

I'm currently using Kannel from last SVN in such configuration: CGI PUSH -- SMSBOX 1 -- BEARERBOX 1 -- SMPP LINK -- Open SMPPBOX --- BEARERBOX 2 To BEARERBOX 2 I have connected 3 SMSC via AT2. Each SMSC have the same smsc-id to make load balancing available. When I push a MT Message

Re: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

Hi, You are not using correct configuration for load-balancing. Use different smsc-id for each smsc and simply do not specify smsc in your sendsms url. Kannel will load-balance SMS using rand() and load on each smsc. This will allow finer control (load) over your smscs, since when you want

Re: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

Hi Nikos, Sorry, I didn't make it so clear in my first post. I use other smsc-id for each SMSC but I use also some virtual smsc-id at allowed-smsc-id which is identical for several SMSC. It allows me to make several SMSC groups with load balancing - each group has several modems. Then I specify

Re: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

Subject: Re: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP Hi Nikos, Sorry, I didn't make it so clear in my first post. I use other smsc-id for each SMSC but I use also some virtual smsc-id at allowed-smsc-id which is identical for several SMSC. It allows me to make several SMSC

RE: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP

Yes, it seems to be a bug in the current version. -Original Message- From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: dinsdag 15 juni 2010 15:35 To: Tomasz; rene.klu...@chimit.nl Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Issue with concatenated messages and load balancing over SMPP Yes

How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and how to Load balancing B/W Muliple SMSC's

Hi All, How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and How to do the Load Balancing and Fail over between Multiple SMSC's. If possible please send sample configuration. :-( Thanks and Regards, Kiran Reddy

Re: How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and how to Load balancing B/W Muliple SMSC's

You should use kannel. Then you send logs and ask questions whats wrong. kiran.re...@mpowerglobal.in wrote: Hi All, How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and How to do the Load Balancing and Fail over between Multiple SMSC's. If possible please send sample configuration. :-( Thanks

Re: How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and how to Load balancing B/W Muliple SMSC's

.smsc.com (...) # Bind 2 group = smsc smsc-id = my_unique_bind smsc= smpp host= host2.smsc.com (...) Le 16/10/2009 17:47, kiran.re...@mpowerglobal.in a écrit : Hi All, How to Multiple SMSC's configuration and How to do the Load

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

addressed it? Thanx, Nikos - Original Message - From: Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Cc: seikath seik...@gmail.com; kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:29 AM Subject: Re: Kannel not load balancing after

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com To: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com; kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:17 AM Subject: Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue Hi Nikos Had you chance to review this? Regards Alvaro

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

or id_op2 into url so kannel load-balance through the smsc of corresponding operator and send the message. This works fine until I restart kannel. After kannel reset, All QUEUED messages are sent through ONLY ONE of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds

Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

into url so kannel load-balance through the smsc of corresponding operator and send the message. This works fine until I restart kannel. After kannel reset, All QUEUED messages are sent through ONLY ONE of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds of queued messages

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

until I restart kannel. After kannel reset, All QUEUED messages are sent through ONLY ONE of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds of queued messages; however if, at the same time, I send messages to any of the id_op1 or id_op2, this new messages

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

through ONLY ONE  of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds of queued messages; however if, at the same time, I send messages to any of the id_op1 or id_op2, this new messages are correctly load-balanced between smsc-at I use: Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.3

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

...@gmail.com Cc: kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:41 AM Subject: Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue No, I'm using mysql for dlr storage since otherwise dlr are lost on kannel restart

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

. This works fine until I restart kannel. After kannel reset, All QUEUED messages are sent through ONLY ONE of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds of queued messages; however if, at the same time, I send messages to any of the id_op1 or id_op2, this new

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com To: seikath seik...@gmail.com Cc: kannel users users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:41 AM Subject: Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue No, I'm using mysql for dlr storage since otherwise dlr are lost

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck in queue

. This works fine until I restart kannel. After kannel reset, All QUEUED messages are sent through ONLY ONE  of the smsc without load-balancing between smsc even though there are hundreds of queued messages; however if, at the same time, I send messages to any of the id_op1 or id_op2, this new

Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue

users users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:29 AM Subject: Re: Kannel not load balancing after restart and messages get stuck inqueue Hi Nikos for 1... still looking at data/logs... nothing so far. for 2... You are right: SMSC connections: id1AT2[id1] (online 323s, rcvd 48

routing or load balancing sms-service

Hi all, I want to know if it it possible to load balance like this or if you have a better idea please post. group = sms-service keyword = default allowed-receiver-prefix = +5978957000;8957000;5978957000;+59708957000;59708957000;08957000 exec = /usr/bin/perl /home/lott/lott.pl %p '%a'

Re: routing or load balancing sms-service

] To: users@kannel.org Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:10 PM Subject: routing or load balancing sms-service Hi all, I want to know if it it possible to load balance like this or if you have a better idea please post. group = sms-service keyword = default allowed-receiver-prefix

Load Balancing

Hi, Is it possible to do load balancing with round robin mechanism on sms-service group? Such as: group = sms-service keyword = abc exec = /path/to/script/1.ext ... group = sms-service keyword = abc exec = /path/to/script/2.ext ... group = sms-service keyword = abc exec = /path/to/script/3.ext

RE: Load Balancing

The best is to load balance on the application server. AFAIK, kannel send the sms with the first sms service which match criteria -Original Message- From: sangprabv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 21 juillet 2008 00:34 To: users@kannel.org Subject: Load Balancing Hi

Re: load balancing can Kannel do it

Just a small note: this method, though very similar to load balancing, it's not really load balancing in a puristic way. It's more like redundancy (with some fault-tolerance accomplished by the fact that two or more links are established). When Kannel has more than one route to deliver traffic

Re: load balancing can Kannel do it

they can come back via either Gateway. 1. For Sending SMSs is there any way to get Kannel to do the load balancing or must one add a patch to CVS? For incoming SMSs we would like to use the setup: group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = smsc_provider smsc-id = Gateway1;Gateway2 2. Will this work

High Availability and Load balancing

Hi All, is it possible to design a high availability sms gateway with kannel ? can kannel manage the load balancing between different sms gateways ? Thank you for your help

Re: High Availability and Load balancing

Mohamed HADROUJ (Gmail) wrote: Hi All, is it possible to design a high availability sms gateway with kannel ? can kannel manage the load balancing between different sms gateways ? Hi Mohamed, yes, this is possible... but(!) (yeah, most of us hate the bug sentensace ;) it's tricky

Simple failover/load balancing with 2 GSM modems

I've been using a T68 as a GSM modem on ttys0 with no problems. Now I have another so connected to ttyS1 and its fine. What I'd like is for kannel to use 1 if not busy then if so use the second (this is for outgoing SMS only). And if either fail, use the remaining one automatically. Is this easy

Load Balancing question

Hi all ! Is it possible to load balance the same route between two smsboxes ? For instance, to have a routing config like this: group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = smsbox_01 shortcuts = 64235 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = smsbox_02 shortcuts = 64235 And have the bearer to round robin this

Re: Load Balancing question

Oscar, As far as I know, that's not possible out of the box. In such setup, bearerbox will always try to use the first available link, so the second one will only get some hits when the server is under high load or when the first link goes down. I would name that failover, not load balancing