Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-06-30 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/16 13:39, Ed Greshko wrote: > > On 07/01/16 13:16, Tim wrote: >> Well, you're participating on a list for Fedora, and many services are >> managed by those people. If it's the Fedora list that's misidentifying >> spam on the way through, its software needs looking at. But I seem to >>

Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-06-30 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/16 13:16, Tim wrote: > Well, you're participating on a list for Fedora, and many services are > managed by those people. If it's the Fedora list that's misidentifying > spam on the way through, its software needs looking at. But I seem to > recall the conversation pointing the finger

Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-06-30 Thread Tim
Allegedly, on or about 01 July 2016, Joel Rees sent: > (The blame lies elsewhere. Yes. While I can't answer to the causes for other people's mail turning up misidentified as spam, I can say that when I mail this list using a Yahoo address, it's sent through the Yahoo SMTP servers, and I have

[389-users] Re: How to change nsaccountlock using ldif file?

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 05:53 +, kash...@arissystem.com wrote: > I am able to change nsaccountlock value using 389ds client software by right > clicking on users and selecting active or inactive. but I need to change > nsaccountlock value using an ldif file. The content of the file is : > >

[389-users] Re: export / import ldif with userpassword

2016-06-30 Thread William Brown
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 15:10 +, Giuseppe Sarno wrote: > Hello, > Is there a way to export users including the userPassword hashed and then > reimporting again ? > > I tried but I keep getting the following: > > #!RESULT ERROR > #!CONNECTION ldap://localhost:389 > #!DATE

[OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-06-30 Thread Joel Rees
To keep this off-list as much as possible, the rant is here: http://reiisi.blogspot.com/2016/07/to-gil-tim-fedora-et-al.html (The blame lies elsewhere. I wish I had the network and social cred to get a real movement started, away from the current faceless CA system and towards a different

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/01/16 05:29, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 30/06/16 07:19, Tom Horsley wrote: >> I was so happy when the nouveau driver finally worked >> on my nvidia maxwell card in fedora 24, but now after >> about a week, this happened: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351286 >> >> Total

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread Stephen Morris
On 30/06/16 07:19, Tom Horsley wrote: I was so happy when the nouveau driver finally worked on my nvidia maxwell card in fedora 24, but now after about a week, this happened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351286 Total screen freeze :-(. At least it took as long as a week. If

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/29/2016 05:31 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote: I was so happy when the nouveau driver finally worked on my nvidia maxwell card in fedora 24, but now after about a week, this happened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351286 Total screen freeze :-(. At least it took as long as

Re: Intel Core i5-6200U laptop issue

2016-06-30 Thread Rick Stevens
On 06/30/2016 12:40 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, I think I was able to catch the error without having to get that > desparate :) > > I logged in from work and did journalctl -f and got the following: > > http://pastebin.com/3JAL297z > > Looks disk hardware related but it's not getting worse

Re: Intel Core i5-6200U laptop issue

2016-06-30 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, I think I was able to catch the error without having to get that desparate :) I logged in from work and did journalctl -f and got the following: http://pastebin.com/3JAL297z Looks disk hardware related but it's not getting worse so I doubt it's the disk itself, driver problem instead?

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread Doug
On 06/30/2016 12:10 PM, stan wrote: On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:54:45 -0400 "Eddie O'Connor" wrote: Is this something that's going to affect my EXTREMELY OLD Gateway T6321 laptop? Unlikely if you aren't having issues already. Nouveau has been having lockup issues for a

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread stan
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:54:45 -0400 "Eddie O'Connor" wrote: > Is this something that's going to affect my EXTREMELY OLD Gateway > T6321 laptop? Unlikely if you aren't having issues already. Nouveau has been having lockup issues for a long time. The nouveau bug report

Re: Intel Core i5-6200U laptop issue

2016-06-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016, 6:21 AM Richard Shaw wrote: >> >> Ok, apparently I need to reboot this conversation :) >> >> The filesystem is not corrupted (other than what occurs during a forced >>

Re: Nouveau, Oh No!

2016-06-30 Thread Eddie O'Connor
Is this something that's going to affect my EXTREMELY OLD Gateway T6321 laptop?I was under the impression that "Wayland" was going to solve the issues with drivers that didn't quite work? (I was thinking of upgrading my hardware to a Lenovo IdeaPad...but if there might be funky things

[389-users] export / import ldif with userpassword

2016-06-30 Thread Giuseppe Sarno
Hello, Is there a way to export users including the userPassword hashed and then reimporting again ? I tried but I keep getting the following: #!RESULT ERROR #!CONNECTION ldap://localhost:389 #!DATE 2016-06-30T16:07:09.508 #!ERROR [LDAP: error code 19 - pre-hashed passwords are not valid ]

Re: Intel Core i5-6200U laptop issue

2016-06-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016, 6:21 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > Ok, apparently I need to reboot this conversation :) > > The filesystem is not corrupted (other than what occurs during a forced > power off). Many days, it boots and runs just fine for the whole day, > when it does have a

Re: No akmod nvidia yet in rpmfusion?

2016-06-30 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/30/16 20:49, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:53:51 +0800 > Ed Greshko wrote: > >>> The rpmfusion repos don't seem to have an akmod-nvidia package >>> for fedora 24. >> What do you mean? > It wasn't there this morning. I cleaned metadata, I reinstalled > the rpmfusion repos,

NetworkManager drops config on link down

2016-06-30 Thread Chris Adams
I have a USB ethernet adapter on my desktop system that I use when configuring new equipment (servers, routers, switches, etc.). I have a variety of pre-set configs in NM, like 192.168.0.x, 10.0.0.x, etc. Often while configuring something, I need to reboot it, which drops the link. NM

Re: No akmod nvidia yet in rpmfusion?

2016-06-30 Thread Tom Horsley
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:53:51 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: > > The rpmfusion repos don't seem to have an akmod-nvidia package > > for fedora 24. > > What do you mean? It wasn't there this morning. I cleaned metadata, I reinstalled the rpmfusion repos, dnf install kept telling me there is no

Re: Intel Core i5-6200U laptop issue

2016-06-30 Thread Richard Shaw
Ok, apparently I need to reboot this conversation :) The filesystem is not corrupted (other than what occurs during a forced power off). Many days, it boots and runs just fine for the whole day, when it does have a problem, it's not a boot but rather towards the latter part of the day. So

Re: No akmod nvidia yet in rpmfusion?

2016-06-30 Thread Ed Greshko
On 06/30/16 19:47, Tom Horsley wrote: > I had to back up one kernel release to get kmod-nvidia to work :-(. > > The rpmfusion repos don't seem to have an akmod-nvidia package > for fedora 24. What do you mean? [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -q akmod-nvidia akmod-nvidia-358.16-2.fc24.x86_64 --

No akmod nvidia yet in rpmfusion?

2016-06-30 Thread Tom Horsley
I had to back up one kernel release to get kmod-nvidia to work :-(. The rpmfusion repos don't seem to have an akmod-nvidia package for fedora 24. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options:

SOLVED: Re: Sound card Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 not working after update to F24

2016-06-30 Thread Matthew Colton
I followed your guideline and it works just as expected now. Thank you very much Richard! :) Cheers Mat Am 30.06.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Richard Hughes: > On 30 June 2016 at 08:37, Richard Hughes wrote: >> You can get it from koji; I forgot to do the f24 build: > Done: >

Re: [Fedora] Re: dnf update tries to install yum

2016-06-30 Thread Michal Domonkos
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Walter Cazzola wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Michal Domonkos wrote: > >> It looks like something that is being updated is pulling in the yum >> package as a dependency. As Tom mentioned, you can find out by trying >> to remove yum, or even

Re: Sound card Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 not working after update to F24

2016-06-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 June 2016 at 08:37, Richard Hughes wrote: > You can get it from koji; I forgot to do the f24 build: Done: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fwupd-0.7.2-1.fc24%20libappstream-glib-0.5.16-1.fc24 You need to install it, reboot, remove the USB device, replug and

Re: Sound card Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 not working after update to F24

2016-06-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 June 2016 at 06:57, Matthew Colton wrote: > Update fwupd. There is a DFU issue we only recently found and fixed. Richard Sorry for the short response, I was on mobile and too tired to find a laptop. See https://github.com/hughsie/fwupd/issues/50 for the upstream bug.

Re: [Fedora] Re: dnf update tries to install yum

2016-06-30 Thread Walter Cazzola
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Michal Domonkos wrote: It looks like something that is being updated is pulling in the yum package as a dependency. As Tom mentioned, you can find out by trying to remove yum, or even better, by running "dnf repoquery --installed --whatrequires yum". at the moment yum is

Re: Sound card Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 not working after update to F24

2016-06-30 Thread Matthew Colton
Am 29.06.2016 um 20:05 schrieb stan: > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:59:29 - > "Matthew Colton" wrote: > >> Hi all, >> as the subject says my sound card stopped working after the update to >> F24. The sound card worked like a charm in F22 and F23. > That's certainly bizarre. I