> On 16 Oct 2024, at 09:55, Stephen Morris via users
> wrote:
>
> I issued the command modinfo kmod-nvidia-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64 but that
> says it can't find that module, so how do I issue that command against the
> nvidia driver?
modinfo works on kernel modules
On 16/10/24 02:01, Barry wrote:
On 15 Oct 2024, at 10:49, Stephen Morris via users
wrote:
How do I check if the nvidia driver is actually signed?
George gave the check.
It maybe that the drive was built before the key was created?
If so you will need to remove built driver, somewhere in
> On 15 Oct 2024, at 10:49, Stephen Morris via users
> wrote:
>
> How do I check if the nvidia driver is actually signed?
George gave the check.
It maybe that the drive was built before the key was created?
If so you will need to remove built driver, somewhere in /var
And te
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 6:49 AM Stephen Morris via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> How do I check if the nvidia driver is actually signed?
>
modinfo should show entries for:
sig_id:
signer:
sig_key:
sig_hashalgo:
signature:
--
George
On 15/10/24 20:49, Stephen Morris via users wrote:
Hi,
I have built the kmod-nvidia modules manually for all 3 kernels I
have installed via akmods, but the startup of KDE or Gnome from SDDM
switches to a black screen and the monitor then switches into sleep
mode with "No Signal Det
Hi,
I have built the kmod-nvidia modules manually for all 3 kernels I
have installed via akmods, but the startup of KDE or Gnome from SDDM
switches to a black screen and the monitor then switches into sleep mode
with "No Signal Detected".
The output from modinfo -F vers
the application
> developer.
> In this case nvidia I assume.
>
I agree. My experience has been that Nvidia provides only the bare minimum
information in error messages -- I assume they worry that error messages
might
reveal the special sauce they are so
> On 7 Sep 2024, at 08:59, François Patte
> wrote:
>
> No more exlanation (as usual with journalctl...)
journalctl does not decide what is logged that is up to the application
developer.
In this case nvidia I assume.
Barry
--
___
u
Le 2024-09-07 08:21, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit :
Hi.
On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 16:44:51 +0200 François Patte wrote:
When I suspend my system, it is impossible to resume with the nvidia
module (works with nouveau and was working with f36)
kernel: 6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64
nvidia
Hi.
On Wed, 04 Sep 2024 16:44:51 +0200 François Patte wrote:
> When I suspend my system, it is impossible to resume with the nvidia
> module (works with nouveau and was working with f36)
> kernel: 6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64
> nvidia stuff:
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-power-560.35.0
Bonjour,
When I suspend my system, it is impossible to resume with the nvidia
module (works with nouveau and was working with f36)
kernel: 6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64
nvidia stuff:
nvidia-gpu-firmware-20240811-2.fc40.noarch
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc-560.35.03-3.fc40.x86_64
xorg-x11-drv
On Mon, 2024-07-15 at 10:44 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 7/15/24 9:14 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm not sure what any of this has to do with installing Nvidia
> > drivers,
> > but then I've never enabled Secure Boot.
>
> If secure boot is enabl
On 7/15/24 4:05 PM, François Patte wrote:
Le 2024-07-14 10:50, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and
reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some
signature
I have secure boot enabled.
Is there some how
Le 2024-07-14 10:50, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and
reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some
signature
I have secure boot enabled.
Is there some how-to explaining with details how to proceed
On 7/15/24 9:14 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'm not sure what any of this has to do with installing Nvidia drivers,
but then I've never enabled Secure Boot.
If secure boot is enabled, the kernel can't load unsigned drivers. You
can't sign the drivers with t
gt;
The existing Fedora secure boot configuration may offer some
protection for those
who also boot Windows.
I'm not sure what any of this has to do with installing Nvidia drivers,
but then I've never enabled Secure Boot.
poc
I'm not sure what the current status of your sys
when initread and kernel are separate,
> > and /boot should be encrypted:
> > <https://ruderich.org/simon/notes/secure-boot-with-grub-and-signed-
> > linux-and-initrd>
>
> > The existing Fedora secure boot configuration may offe
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 6:48 AM George N. White III wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 5:50 AM François Patte
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> I have secure boot enabled.
>>
>> Is there some how-to explaining with details how to proceed. I'm not
>> very good with efi boot system nor secure boot.
>
> You s
On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 5:50 AM François Patte <
francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr> wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and
> reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some
> signature
>
The in
On Jul 14, 2024, at 04:51, François Patte
wrote:
>
> Bonjour,
>
> According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and reboot.
> some others tell that we have to generate and install some signature
>
> I have secure boot enabled.
>
> Is there
Bonjour,
According to some howto, it is enough to install akmods-nvidia and
reboot. some others tell that we have to generate and install some
signature
I have secure boot enabled.
Is there some how-to explaining with details how to proceed. I'm not
very good with efi boot syste
> On 2 May 2024, at 18:11, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>
> This is a know issue: you rebooted slightly too early, during the
> %post of the kmod-nvidia-KERNEL rpm that does this depmod.
The system-upgrade does the reboot and the user has no way to delay it.
It is, as you
Hi
On Thu, 02 May 2024 13:00:47 -0400 Neal Becker wrote:
> Finally I manually run
> depmod -a
> Then reboot again.
> Now nvidia driver is loaded and nvidia-smi reports success.
> My question is:
> Why did I need to manually run depmod -a?
This is a know issue: you rebooted
Not as bad perhaps as some of your experiences, because I'm using nvidia
GPU for M/L on a remote server and not for desktop display.
After update the nvidia driver is not loaded. Tried rebooting a couple of
times since sometimes akmod seems to need this.
Manually loading the driver
mod
On 4/30/24 2:23 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
What kernel are you using?
The bad patching ("dnf upgrade" early this month) was from
6.7.11-100.fc38x86_64 to 6.8.4-100.fc38x86_64.
The good patching Saturday was from 6.7.11-100.fc38x86_64 to
6.8.7-100.fc38x86_64.
The full upgrade ("dnf system-upgra
What kernel are you using?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 21:15 home user wrote:
> On 4/11/24 11:19 AM, home user wrote:
> > (f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
> kmod 4xx driver)
> >
> > I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prere
On 4/11/24 11:19 AM, home user wrote:
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor; kmod 4xx
driver)
I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to upgrading from
f-38 to f-39.
There were no hints of any problems. The kernel and the graph
Had to have machine with older card keep running the 6.7.11
kernel in order to have a working nvidia driver for BOINC.
The newer ones now work with the 6.8 kernels.
Just to let others know.
++
Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science
On 15/04/2024 20:02, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 11:19 AM, home user wrote:
After a few days of being seriously side-tracked, I can try to get back
to this.
Those who explained the kernel numbering: thank-you.
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
kmod 4xx
again.
(Todd)
I can tell you that building the 2 or 3 nvidia 470xx packages
works well for the later 6.7 and current 6.8 kernels.
and there's
2.
(John)
AIUI we are moving from X11 graphics towards Wayland, which the nvidia
driver will not support...
(Michael)
So, not sure if this is a ke
On 4/11/24 11:19 AM, home user wrote:
After a few days of being seriously side-tracked, I can try to get back to this.
Those who explained the kernel numbering: thank-you.
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor; kmod 4xx
driver)
I just finished doing a &quo
On 4/14/24 17:21, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
So, not sure why it works with 6.7.x but not with 6.8.x.
Something changed in the kernel and the NVidia driver needs to be
changed to work with it. The driver is out of tree so it doesn't get
fixed by the people making the change
On 14 Apr 2024 at 18:50, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 18:50:40 +0100
Subject:Re: crippling nvidia display issue.
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: John Pilkington
Send reply to: Community
On 14/04/2024 16:22, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
On 15 Apr 2024 at 0:29, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
Just as an additional note. I have an older Acer notebook that has
an NVIDIA GT 650M that had been working fine with the
rpmfusion driver. Have BOINC using its GPU for a
On 15 Apr 2024 at 0:29, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
To: Community support for Fedora users
Date sent: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:29:38 +1000
Subject:Re: crippling nvidia display issue.
Priority: normal
Send reply to: mi
On 14 Apr 2024 at 12:47, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 12:47:57 +0100
Subject:Re: crippling nvidia display issue.
From: John Pilkington
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community
On 12/04/2024 12:58, John Pilkington wrote:
On 12/04/2024 00:52, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:36, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02
> On 12 Apr 2024, at 01:06, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> My system gets regular updates. I've never had a yadda-yadda-100 kernel,
> all mine are -200. Currently I'm running 6.8.4-200.fc39.x86_64, all the
> kernels in my old fedora 38 partition are also -200, not -100.
The -NNN is the version that is
On 12/04/2024 00:52, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:36, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02/_kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64/nvidia-drm
home user composed on 2024-04-11 19:49 (UTC-0600):
> What does the -100 vs. -200 signify?
From observation, not reading any doc:
A fresh Fedora release gets -300, moving the prior release to -200, and the
prior
to prior release to -100. After the prior-prior's support ends, there is only
curren
On 4/11/24 18:49, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 7:00 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:06 PM Tom Horsley
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:10 -0600
home user wrote:
kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64
Possibly relevant, but I don't know what it means for sure:
My system gets regula
On 4/11/24 7:00 PM, Go Canes wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:06 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:10 -0600
home user wrote:
kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64
Possibly relevant, but I don't know what it means for sure:
My system gets regular updates. I've never had a yadda-ya
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:06 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:10 -0600
> home user wrote:
>
> > kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64
>
> Possibly relevant, but I don't know what it means for sure:
>
> My system gets regular updates. I've never had a yadda-yadda-100 kernel,
> all min
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:52:10 -0600
home user wrote:
> kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64
Possibly relevant, but I don't know what it means for sure:
My system gets regular updates. I've never had a yadda-yadda-100 kernel,
all mine are -200. Currently I'm running 6.8.4-200.fc39.x86_64, all the
kern
On 4/11/24 5:39 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:36, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02/_kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:748:40:
error
On 4/11/24 16:36, home user wrote:
On 4/11/24 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02/_kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:748:40:
error: 'DRM_UNLOCKED' undeclared here
On 4/11/24 5:31 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02/_kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:748:40:
error: 'DRM_UNLOCKED' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
On 4/11/24 16:05, home user wrote:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.2VNb1GB1/BUILD/nvidia-470xx-kmod-470.223.02/_kmod_build_6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:748:40:
error: 'DRM_UNLOCKED' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
'VM_LOCKED'?
There has been a k
[ OK ]
Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED]
Building rpms failed; see
/var/cache/akmods/nvidia-470xx/470.223.02-2-for-6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64.failed.log
for details
So what's in that log?
That's a 906-line file, many of those lines are v-e-r-
nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED]
Building rpms failed; see
/var/cache/akmods/nvidia-470xx/470.223.02-2-for-6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64.failed.log for details
So what's in that log?
That's a 906-line file, many of those lines are v-e-r-y long. I could
not make any real sense of
On 4/11/24 4:34 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/11/24 13:01, home user wrote:
I tried the command suggested in that log file.
--
bash.24[~]: /usr/sbin/akmods --force
Checking kmods exist for 6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64 [ OK ]
Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod
On 4/11/24 13:01, home user wrote:
I tried the command suggested in that log file.
--
bash.24[~]: /usr/sbin/akmods --force
Checking kmods exist for 6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64 [ OK ]
Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED]
Building rpms failed; see
/var
On 4/11/24 11:19 AM, home user wrote:
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor; kmod 4xx
driver)
I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to upgrading from
f-38 to f-39.
There were no hints of any problems. The kernel and the graph
home user wrote:
> I tried the command suggested in that log file.
>
> --
> bash.24[~]: /usr/sbin/akmods --force
> Checking kmods exist for 6.8.4-100.fc38.x86_64 [ OK ]
> Building and installing nvidia-470xx-kmod [FAILED]
> Building rpm
On 4/11/24 12:34, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:09:26 -0700
Doug Herr wrote:
I don't have Nvidia currently and can't remember where you find those logs.
/var/log/akmod/akmod.log
If it doesn't say something about "Success" near the end, then it didn'
On 4/11/24 12:09, Doug Herr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024, at 10:19 AM, home user wrote:
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
kmod 4xx driver)
I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to
upgrading from f-38 to f-39.
There were no hi
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 15:12:08 -0400
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> When something does not (can not?) build correctly, can you just boot
> to an earlier kernel until the problems with the current kernel
> modules are fixed? Or does rebuilding akmod break past kernels?
I've certainly just booted old kerne
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 2:35 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:09:26 -0700
> Doug Herr wrote:
>
> > I don't have Nvidia currently and can't remember where you find those logs.
>
> /var/log/akmod/akmod.log
>
> If it doesn't say something
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:09:26 -0700
Doug Herr wrote:
> I don't have Nvidia currently and can't remember where you find those logs.
/var/log/akmod/akmod.log
If it doesn't say something about "Success" near the end, then it didn't
build correctly.
I usually do a
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024, at 10:19 AM, home user wrote:
> (f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
> kmod 4xx driver)
>
> I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to
> upgrading from f-38 to f-39.
> There were no hints of a
On 4/11/24 12:19, home user wrote:
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
kmod 4xx driver)
I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to
upgrading from f-38 to f-39.
There were no hints of any problems. The kernel and the graphics dr
(f-38; stand-alone work station; nvidia graphics card; dual monitor;
kmod 4xx driver)
I just finished doing a "dnf upgrade" as a prerequisite step to
upgrading from f-38 to f-39.
There were no hints of any problems. The kernel and the graphics driver
were replaced during this &q
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 4:43 PM wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 22:19:51 + Paul Smith wrote:
>
> > This error began after:
>
> > Packages Altered:
> ...
> > @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> > Upgraded akmod-nvidia-3:550.54.14
> On 31 Mar 2024, at 02:33, Tim via users wrote:
>
> Also, back then, we didn't have parallel boot processes, so the system
> did wait for it to finish before carrying on.
The boot in today’s Fedora waits for akmods to build anything that is out of
date.
But there is a known problem which is
On Sat, 2024-03-30 at 17:15 +, John Pilkington wrote:
> The rpmfusion nvidia howto says it may take 5 minutes to build. That's
> a long time to wait with no obvious progress during a reboot.
Many years ago I had to put up with that (different hardware now).
But, I didn't
On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 10:55:35 -0600 Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 03/30/2024 10:43 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>> Have you wait for akmods to compile the nvidia kernel modules before
>> rebooting ?
> Unless things have changed considerably since I used those drivers,
Probably
On 30/03/2024 16:55, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/30/2024 10:43 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Have you wait for akmods to compile the nvidia kernel modules before
rebooting ?
Unless things have changed considerably since I used those drivers, the
akmod module runs at boot, and checks to see
On 03/30/2024 10:43 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Have you wait for akmods to compile the nvidia kernel modules before
rebooting ?
Unless things have changed considerably since I used those drivers, the
akmod module runs at boot, and checks to see if it needs to do anything.
If it
Hi.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 22:19:51 + Paul Smith wrote:
> This error began after:
> Packages Altered:
...
> @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> Upgraded akmod-nvidia-3:550.54.14-2.fc39.x86_64 @@System
...
> @rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> Upgraded xorg-x11-drv-
-free-updates
Upgraded mplayer-1.5.1-0.8.20230811svn.fc39.x86_64 @@System
Upgrade mplayer-common-1.5.1-0.12.20240317svn.fc39.x86_64
@rpmfusion-free-updates
Upgraded mplayer-common-1.5.1-0.8.20230811svn.fc39.x86_64@@System
Upgrade akmod-nvidia-3:550.67-1.fc39
On 03/12/2023 12:37, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 3 Dec 2023 at 10:06, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:06:32 +
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
From: John Pilkington
To: users
On 3 Dec 2023 at 10:06, John Pilkington wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:06:32 +
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
From: John Pilkington
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Send reply to: Community support
completely and is now showing the Nvidia GPU being used.
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-545.29.06.run
That script ran and had no issues, and BOINC is using it, and was
getting stat of 4,000 per day with 6 CPUs, but now with .9 CPU +
GPU is already up to 8,000 and only been about 1/2 day.
So, just a matter
On 02/12/2023 23:39, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Finally got it working, but tried lots of info from different pages,
and would get all kinds of different messages.
Cleared out everything, and tried things until this seems to have
run completely and is now showing the Nvidia GPU being
On 2 Dec 2023 at 10:40, Joe Zeff wrote:
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Joe Zeff
Date sent: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 10:40:35 -0700
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora
On 12/02/2023 10:27 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda comes from rpmfusion and only provides the cuda
driver, not the whole cuda software. If this is sufficient for BOINC, using
only the rpmfusion repository will work and will be simpler to manage.
I've been
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 09:49:35 +1000 "Michael D. Setzer II" wrote:
> Followed instruction that removed all nvida packages.
> rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
> now shows nothing.
> Tried to install but get message about filtering??
> dnf install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-cuda
> La
On 1 Dec 2023 at 18:43, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
From: francis.montag...@inria.fr
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Re: NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
Date sent: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 18:43:31 +0100
Send reply to
On Sat, 02 Dec 2023 03:32:04 +1030 Tim via users wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 09:43 +, John Pilkington wrote:
>> /!\ Please remember to wait after the RPM transaction ends, until the
>> kmod get built. This can take up to 5 minutes on some systems.
> Don't they bother to do anything to let
On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 09:43 +, John Pilkington wrote:
> /!\ Please remember to wait after the RPM transaction ends, until the
> kmod get built. This can take up to 5 minutes on some systems.
Don't they bother to do anything to let you know when it's finished?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-
Hi
On Fri, 01 Dec 2023 09:43:09 + John Pilkington wrote:
> On 01/12/2023 05:57, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
>> rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
>> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc-535.129.03-2.fc38.x86_64
>> akmod-nvidia-535.129.03-1.fc38.x86_64
>> nvidia-driver
On 01/12/2023 05:57, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Forgot to add info. In working to get it originally working, had
following instruction from only page that actually worked and
ended up with these packages being installed.
rpm -qa | grep -i nvidia
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-kmodsrc
On 1 Dec 2023 at 15:52, Michael D. Setzer II via user wrote:
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date sent: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 15:52:13 +1000
Subject:NVIDIA RPM DNF Update Issue?
Priority: normal
Send reply to: mi...@guam.net
Recently replaced an ATI video card with a NVIDIA GTX 1070 card
on one of my Fedora 38 machine.
Seemed to have it working, but today got an error with dnf update.
Went to a number of sites, and with some instructions it shows a
message about module filtering??
Use BOINC and was trying to get
nels work OK without workaround seem to vary with which NVidia/PC
combination.
These are slow booting oldsters with no more than 2 CPU threads (here at least).
Worse, the G98 is a PCI card, not PCIe. :(
<https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-desktop-74/kernel-6-5-9-gt210-not-supported-by
On Sat, 2023-07-01 at 11:32 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Does this mean that these drivers are replaced and accessed on the fly
> but the associated kernel modules do not become active until after a reboot?
That's generally the case. Various library updates can only be used
after ones in memor
f any
component like that, but that doesn't mean there isn't.
As I said, in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6C74V5VVPE4EX5MESHTJCIPPYX5V43J4/
During the upgrade, the Xorg nvidia drivers may have been updated. Example:
/usr/lib64/xorg/
t doesn't mean there isn't.
As I said, in
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6C74V5VVPE4EX5MESHTJCIPPYX5V43J4/
During the upgrade, the Xorg nvidia drivers may have been updated. Example:
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_dr
On 26/6/23 20:17, Barry wrote:
On 26 Jun 2023, at 09:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
I was just expecting the kmod/akmod nvidia drivers the system was using when I
did the upgrade would still be being used until I rebooted, but that seemed to
not be the case.
The upgrade does not do anything to
> On 26 Jun 2023, at 09:08, Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> I was just expecting the kmod/akmod nvidia drivers the system was using when
> I did the upgrade would still be being used until I rebooted, but that seemed
> to not be the case.
The upgrade does not do anything to the
edora machines.
Barry
Thankyou for the responses everyone. I'm using the kmod and akmod nvidia
drivers from the rpmfusion repositories and I didn't do a reboot after
the upgrade, I accessed an email containing a link into one of the games
I play through firefox, but it would not run b
On 25/06/2023 13:20, George N. White III wrote:
You should check the version of the nvidea drivers you are currently
using.
If you don't want to wait 5 minutes there are ways to determine that
the installation
has finished, e.g, using journalctl.
The way I use to figure out its safe to reboo
On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 5:43 AM Stephen Morris
wrote:
> Hi,
> When we issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade" and it updates the
> nvidia drivers, does the update of those drivers remove them from memory
> and load the nouveau drivers?
>
Nvidia updates can be messy.
Hi.
On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 18:43:27 +1000 Stephen Morris wrote:
> When we issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade" and it updates the
> nvidia drivers, does the update of those drivers remove them from memory
> and load the nouveau drivers?
The kernel drivers no. They are m
Hi,
When we issue the command "sudo dnf upgrade" and it updates the
nvidia drivers, does the update of those drivers remove them from memory
and load the nouveau drivers?
I'm trying to understand why after doing the update a html 5 game
that requires hardware acce
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 4:04 AM Barry wrote:
>
>
> > On 5 May 2023, at 21:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 4:04 PM Tim via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Tim:
> Are you falling foul of the recent Gnome change that puts a machine
> to sleep if it considers that it's
> On 5 May 2023, at 21:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 4:04 PM Tim via users
> wrote:
>>
>> Tim:
Are you falling foul of the recent Gnome change that puts a machine
to sleep if it considers that it's been idle for about 15 minutes?
One of the all-tim
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 4:04 PM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> Tim:
> >> Are you falling foul of the recent Gnome change that puts a machine
> >> to sleep if it considers that it's been idle for about 15 minutes?
> >>
> >> One of the all-time *DUMB* moves by Gnome.
>
> George N. White III:
> > Not at all
Tim:
>> Are you falling foul of the recent Gnome change that puts a machine
>> to sleep if it considers that it's been idle for about 15 minutes?
>>
>> One of the all-time *DUMB* moves by Gnome.
George N. White III:
> Not at all. Large organizations are trying to reduce power
> consumption by wo
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 6:50 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tim via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 16:20 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >
> >> I may have another problem but time will tell (running on the newer
> >> kernel connecting via ssh several times I've walked away and then the
> >> machin
1 - 100 of 1623 matches
Mail list logo
