Hello:
I'm Using Opensips-1.6.4 with permissions module to classify clients in
different groups depending of the source IP. Everything works fine but
today, after inserting a new subnet in table address and doing "opensipsctl
address reload" i saw in the log the message:
CRITICAL:permissions:subn
Well, this indicate that you have a bug in your test call flows - the
BYE ending the calls should also end the dialogs - there is no need for
them to expire.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05/23/2013 06:46 AM, microx wrote:
> Hi
On May 23, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Carlos Oliva wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm Using Opensips-1.6.4 with permissions module to classify clients in
> different groups depending of the source IP. Everything works fine but today,
> after inserting a new subnet in table address and doing "opensipsctl address
Hi Khaled,
Check the return code of the use_next_gw() - if there is no other GW to
be used (all used), the function will return false and, of course, no
gw_id or rule_attrs will be available.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05/22
Hello Nathaniel,
My test was just to see if your opensips hits the fixup function for the
flags - and it seems it does (the value I gave you is bogus, so it ended
up with error).
Could you try this new patch (remove old one) ? (of course, put back the
"p0" param ).
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan-An
And starting with trunk version, OpenSIPS implements a REST client - see
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/rest_client.html
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05/23/2013 08:14 AM, Daniel Yu wrote:
> M.Khaled,
>
> It may
Hi Nick,
if INVITE goes .11 -> .5 -> .10 -> .20 -> .122, why the 100 reply from
.122 goes to .5 ??? replies have to be relaid back exactly on the same
path as the request.
So, the 100 reply from .122 must go to .20, not to .5 !!!
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http:
Sorry send wrong trace
T 2013/05/23 13:24:13.215773 10.222.1.253:37827 -> 10.222.0.17:5060 [AP]
SUBSCRIBE sip:2...@g-voip.stb.ua SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.222.1.253:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1334330933;rport;alias.
From: ;tag=1005928247.
To: .
Call-ID: 310582788-5060...@ba.ccc.b.cfd.
CSeq: 20070 SUBSCR
Hello Bogdan, thank you so much. The reason for that is the port
forwarding that is from NAT to .5 for SIP and RTP traffic. Do we have
any options to relay the .100 to .5? I tried to set some flags on .5
(i.e., if(status=="183" || status="100")) in the reply_route, but
could not catch the replies c
Hi,
I am using opensips 1.8.3,
In the do_routing("$cusid","FW") I allow fail over and weight,
Moreover I create a two dial rules with same priority and prefix
1578,157 and assign to 1578 gwlist #USA that includes gw1 and gw2 to
it
& for dial rule 157 I assign gwlist gw3
Hello!
Could you please just direct me little bit...
centos 6.3
opensips-1.9.1
rtpproxy-1.2.1
I am trying to build a node that will play a b2b role.
What I am looking for:
1. use several send_socket IP (depends on route)
2. use rtpproxy with different IP (depends on route)
3. use INVITE auth if
Hello Bogdan,
The change that you did is now causing things to work. I have attached a
snippet of the log file and I have listed the output from the extra
debug lines from your patch within the email:
May 23 09:31:28 OpenSips[23458]: [ID 197553 local1.error] SAVING THE
SUBSCRIBER INTO THE
Greetings list,
I'd like to be able to use a pvar in the subscribe function for the event
interface like so:
subscribe("$avp(event_name)", "$avp(rabbit_url)")
Where event_name would be like E_CUSTOM_SUBSCRIBE and url would be
"rabbitmq:localhost/$fU"
I know this is not supported yet and I'd be i
13 matches
Mail list logo
