Me too please unsubscribe me from this
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Nora Farrell wrote:
> Please remove me from this email list.
>
> Thank You
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
>
>> Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
>> --
>> > M
On 01/15/2013 08:04 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
> Roundcube decides to respect "Mail-Reply-To:" and to ignore "Reply-To:".
This chunk of code tells everything. What's wrong here in your opinion?
$mailfollowup = $MESSAGE->headers->others['mail-followup-to'];
$mailreplyto = $MESSAGE->headers->oth
Am 16.01.2013 03:23, schrieb Cor Bosman:
> Ive actually always used Reply-All if I want my message to go back to the
> list. Quite a few mailinglists will reply to the sender, not the list, by
> default. This because it's safer to mistakenly only send a public message to
> a private sender, t
On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
> Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman:
>
>> But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it?
>
> Because it's a fact. See previous test mails.
>
>> I dont see it in your replies.
>
> Sure, because unlike other users, I don't set
Please remove me from this email list.
Thank You
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
> Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
> --
> > Michael Heydekamp
>
> Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):
>
Am 16.01.2013 00:09, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
> Am 15.01.2013 23:58, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>> what the hell
>> can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST
>
> No.
then please unsubscribe or spam a list where i am not
subscribed - unbelieveable what you are you do in an
amateurish way o
Am 15.01.2013 23:58, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> what the hell
> can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST
No.
> if roundcube adds whatever header
One of the questions was if the list does change/add any headers. And it
DOES.
Go to bed, Harald, and have a good night.
Cheers,
--
Michael H
Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman:
> But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it?
Because it's a fact. See previous test mails.
> I dont see it in your replies.
Sure, because unlike other users, I don't set any Reply-To: (and therefore
"Mail-Reply-To:") at all.
More analysis to
what the hell
can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST
if roundcube adds whatever header there is no need to
bother 100,1000... people with your tests to figure it
out and if not it is off-topic at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
--
> Michael Heydekamp , Roundcube Users mailing list
>
Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):
-
> Reply-To: Michael Heyde
Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
--
> Michael Heydekamp , Roundcube Users mailing list
>
Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):
-
> Reply-To: Michael Heyde
Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
--
> Michael Heydekamp
Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):
-
> Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp
> Mail-Reply-To: Michael Hey
Entry under "Identities/Reply-To":
--
> Michael Heydekamp
Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):
-
> Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp
> Mail-Reply-To: Michael Hey
> "Correct" to me is what is defined as a standard in RFCs. Unless I'm blind
> or dumb (or both), I can't see that "Mail-Reply-To:" is standardized in any
> RFC.
>
> If I should be wrong, please point me to the relevant RFC.
Plenty of things on the internet happen without RFCs. Generally before s
Am 15.01.2013 21:06, schrieb Cor Bosman:
> Once mail-reply-to is set, the correct action is to use it as the primary
> recipient of the reply.
"Correct" to me is what is defined as a standard in RFCs. Unless I'm blind
or dumb (or both), I can't see that "Mail-Reply-To:" is standardized in any
RFC
Once mail-reply-to is set, the correct action is to use it as the primary
recipient of the reply. So roundcube is doing the right thing by replying to a
mail-reply-to header IF it's set in the email. The proper thing to do is to see
what is setting the mail-reply-to in the first place.
See http
Grmpf, I attached the wrong message, sorry. Correct message now attached.
When replying to it, all blank quoted lines get lost.
--
Michael Heydekamp
Co-Admin freexp.de
Düsseldorf/Germany
Am 15.01.2013 20:39, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
> As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted below (
As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted below (and attached) does
delete all quoted (!) blank lines in Thomas' announcement.
I raised a similar issue (in a different way) in the dev list already
(07.01.2013, 00:02, Subject "Editing draft message does delete blank (and
only blank?) quoted
Am 15.01.2013 18:12, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:13:25 +0100, Michael Heydekamp
> wrote:
>> xxxä x xxx x xxxäx xx x xx xx
>> xx. x x xx xx.xx. xx , xx xxx
>> xx xxx xxß
On 15.01.2013 19:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.01.2013 19:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
>> A reply to the message quoted below (and attached) does NOT go to the list
>> upon clicking the "Reply to sender" button - it goes to the address stated
>> in the Mail-Reply-To: header instead - but, eve
On 15.01.2013 19:40, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
>>From my point of view, you shouldn't and can't expect the Roundcube user to
> first inspect all headers before clicking the Reply button. [...]
See subject. Quoting "From " is mbox specific, AFAIR, but what do we have
to do with mbox...?
The much b
Am 15.01.2013 19:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
> We had a similar discussion already a while ago (in the dev list, I
> believe). I'm not sure if it was exactly the same scenario or issue, but
> anyway, here we go again:
>
> When replying to a message in any of the Roundcube lists, not only me i
We had a similar discussion already a while ago (in the dev list, I
believe). I'm not sure if it was exactly the same scenario or issue, but
anyway, here we go again:
When replying to a message in any of the Roundcube lists, not only me is
used to simply click the "Reply to sender" button. Usually
Am 15.01.2013 16:59, schrieb Philip Rhoades:
> - when I reply in a new window the mail is not marked as read and
I can't confirm that. What's your setting under "Mark previewed messages as
read" in the Mailbox View section??
> - the mail item is not marked with a little "replied to" arrow
Well,
On 01/15/2013 04:59 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> - PDFs don't seem to open in another tab anymore
What browser? Is there any PDF plugin installed? In 0.9 we have a pdf
plugin detection, if it's not found pdf files are not displayed "inline".
--
Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak
LAN Management System
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:13:25 +0100, Michael Heydekamp
wrote:
> xxxä x xxx x xxxäx xx x xx xx
> xx. x x xx xx.xx. xx , xx xxx
> xx xxx xxßxx, x xxx xx xxx xxx
> xx x x
People,
I know it is bad form to reply to yourself but now I have found a few
issues:
- PDFs don't seem to open in another tab anymore
- when I reply in a new window the mail is not marked as read and
- the mail item is not marked with a little "replied to" arrow
Regards,
Phil.
On 2013-0
Have been doing a little testing in my test environment. No problems to
note so far. Love the new Reply/View/Compose in new window. Something
I've wanted for a long time instead of all those tabs, and that really
streamlines using Roundcube.
Keep up the good work guys.
Cheers
Steve
On 08.01
28 matches
Mail list logo
