On Oct 28, 2005, at 7:21 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 21:35 -0700, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 3:30 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Ideally, I think apache should branch all the standard javax
stuff into a project of it's own. That way tomcat, jetty and
geronimo
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 3:30 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
. . .
Ideally, I think apache should branch all the standard javax
stuff into a project of it's own. That way tomcat, jetty and
geronimo would all be siblings and there would be no cross
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 21:35 -0700, David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 3:30 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Ideally, I think apache should branch all the standard javax
stuff into a project of it's own. That way tomcat, jetty and
geronimo would all be siblings and there would be no cross
Brett Porter wrote:
I think you should just leave them out of your repository, and leave
it up to Geronimo/Tomcat to deploy them into the repo (which they do
now, I think).
Neither geronimo or tomcat has a properly named m2 repository yet.
They alos version the servlet.jar with their own
I think you should just leave them out of your repository, and leave
it up to Geronimo/Tomcat to deploy them into the repo (which they do
now, I think).
Cheers,
Brett
On 10/21/05, Greg Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
We have standard names for SUN JARs:
Hi all (and congrads on the 2.0 release),
we're moving Jetty 6 over to use m2 and I have lots of questions about
deployment.
As well as questions, I would not mind a sanity check on what we have done.
Firstly naming! The groupId I'm using is org.mortbay.jetty
In m1 it appears that the group
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 17:50 +0200, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Hi all (and congrads on the 2.0 release),
we're moving Jetty 6 over to use m2 and I have lots of questions about
deployment.
As well as questions, I would not mind a sanity check on what we have done.
Firstly naming! The groupId
