Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-09 Thread Eric Kolotyluk
Ouch, I was afraid someone would say something like that. Is there some alternative to Play, such that we can migrate existing Play projects to something that is Maven friendly? Cheers, Eric On 2014-12-04 5:31 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote: Play *very* firmly wants you to use the activator

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-09 Thread Curtis Rueden
Hi Eric, Is there some alternative to Play, such that we can migrate existing Play projects to something that is Maven friendly? Grails? http://grails.org/doc/latest/guide/commandLine.html#antAndMaven http://raibledesigns.com/rd/entry/play_vs_grails_smackdown_at Regards, Curtis On Tue, Dec

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mercredi 3 décembre 2014 17:32:47 Rodrigo Cano a écrit : I just want to say that maven is not at all flowers, their phase model is too primitive, to the point where something such as wsimport (pretty basic stuff for good ol' java) did not work properly: I had a configuration for the java

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Eric Kolotyluk
Ha ha ha. Very good :-) I have published to Maven Central, so I know how daunting this can be at first. If you want to publish to Maven Central I recommend https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/getting-started-apache-maven-video Cheers, Eric On 12/3/2014 11:27 AM, Jon Pretty

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Jeff Jensen
If you want to publish to Maven Central I recommend https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/ getting-started-apache-maven-video In case it helps, I've helped a few deploy to Central and recommend this (and the other pages on the Producers menu); makes it very easy:

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Martijn Verburg
Play *very* firmly wants you to use the activator framework to control your build and deploy - I'd seriously not try and fight against it. It's one of the reasons we dropped the Play framework for a community project we're working on, that and the constant breaking of APIs etc :-). Cheers,

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Rodrigo Cano
I just want to say that maven is not at all flowers, their phase model is too primitive, to the point where something such as wsimport (pretty basic stuff for good ol' java) did not work properly: I had a configuration for the java version wanted in the pom.xml, but because of the way phases work

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Jon Pretty
I can offer you this: http://play.textadventures.co.uk/Play.aspx?id=zv-wer8keey6rnhk4am25q It's a create-your-own-adventure about my experience of trying to publish a library to Maven Central. It's a couple of years old now, so the landscape might have improved a little in patches. Jon On 3

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Jon Pretty
Thanks! I've been doing it successfully for a year or so now, so I'm going to avoid changing any part of the process if I can help it for a while! ;) Cheers, Jon On 3 December 2014 at 21:53, Eric Kolotyluk eric.koloty...@gmail.com wrote: Ha ha ha. Very good :-) I have published to Maven

Re: [scala-debate] Emotional Support Group for Typesafe Maven Users

2014-12-04 Thread Manfred Moser
I sure hope things have changed with all the documentation and help we put into the central landing website and the free staging training course and examples that cover staging to Nexus (and therefore OSSRH and Central) with all sorts of tools. http://central.sonatype.org/