Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16/04/2004 06:03:04 PM:
> On Friday 16 April 2004 05:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > In maven2
>
> I find it somewhat disturbing that discussion turns to Maven2 even
before
> Maven1 is released.
>
> Is it only me to find this highly awkward??
No, y
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 10:39, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > Do you use this sort of setup?
>
> Yes. I personally don't like XML entity includes. So I'd be happy to
> have some built in ways in Maven. I made some proposal a long time ago
> on the Maven mailing lists about the ability to define groups of
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 April 2004 03:08
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: Maven and Development Process
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 17:05, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > > Maven2 support recursive in
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 09:54, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 16 April 2004 20:16, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > > Is it only me to find this highly awkward??
>
> > Why would you find it awkward?
>
> Work is starting on the next generation well before there is a 1.0 release for
> the masses to us
On Friday 16 April 2004 20:16, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Is it only me to find this highly awkward??
> Why would you find it awkward?
Work is starting on the next generation well before there is a 1.0 release for
the masses to use, sounds like lack of focus on development effort.
A product like
Return Receipt
Your RE: Maven and Development Process
document
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 04:03, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 16 April 2004 05:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > In maven2
>
> I find it somewhat disturbing that discussion turns to Maven2 even before
> Maven1 is released.
It is inevitable that some things will come out but in terms of
discussio
I was thinking the exact same thing.
-Original Message-
From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 4:03 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Maven and Development Process
On Friday 16 April 2004 05:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> In maven2
I find
Amato Massimiliano (TLAB) wrote on Friday, April 16, 2004 10:16 AM:
>> Jason,
>>
>> One interesting side-effect of using entities is that if you're
>> importing them from an external source (which, if you're not, what's
>> the point?) then packaging/deploying a pom to the repo will result
>> in a
> Jason,
>
> One interesting side-effect of using entities is that if you're
> importing them from an external source (which, if you're not, what's the
> point?) then packaging/deploying a pom to the repo will result in an
> incomplete info set for others d/l'ing that project for a recursive
> bui
On Friday 16 April 2004 05:13, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> In maven2
I find it somewhat disturbing that discussion turns to Maven2 even before
Maven1 is released.
Is it only me to find this highly awkward??
Niclas
--
+-//---+
| http://www.bali.ac |
| http://nic
Okie dokie. I just got the idea and thought I'd run it by ya. I guess it
was a little out there.
Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:38 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: Maven and
John Casey wrote:
> Jason,
>
> One interesting side-effect of using entities is that if you're
> importing them from an external source (which, if you're not, what's the
> point?) then packaging/deploying a pom to the repo will result in an
> incomplete info set for others d/l'ing that project fo
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 14:38, Mark Langley wrote:
>> If you use XML entities to define your version numbers rather than hard
>> coding them in the project.xml files, the process of switching between
>> snapshot and release versions becomes much easier.
>>
>> See http://wiki.
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 21:28, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >
> > Do you use this sort of setup?
> >
> > I think that the dep section would be expanded along the tree of POMs
> > where needed. But one thing I was think about the POM structure was the
> > possibility of a meta flag to indicate whether an
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 9:08 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: Maven and Development Process
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 17:05, Vincent Massol wrote:
> > > Maven2 support
e some surveys coming along with the maven2
alpha so we'll find out :-)
> -Vincent
>
> >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: April 15, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > To: Maven Users List
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15 April 2004 22:13
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: Maven and Development Process
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 14:38, Mark Langley wrote:
> > If you use XML entities to define
essage-
> From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: April 15, 2004 4:13 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: Maven and Development Process
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 14:38, Mark Langley wrote:
> > If you use XML entities to define your version numbers r
TED]
> Sent: April 15, 2004 1:46 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Maven and Development Process
>
> Somewhat unfortunately (because it does amount to a lot of work), that
> is the current best practice, I believe. At any rate, this is exactly
> what we do.
>
> -
d not the use of entities which I would consider a workaround.
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: April 15, 2004 1:46 PM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: Re: Maven and Development Process
> >
PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: Maven and Development Process
>
> Somewhat unfortunately (because it does amount to a lot of work), that
> is the current best practice, I believe. At any rate, this is exactly
> what we do.
>
> -john
>
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at
.
-Original Message-
From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 15, 2004 1:46 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Maven and Development Process
Somewhat unfortunately (because it does amount to a lot of work), that
is the current best practice, I believe. At any rate, this is exactly
what
Somewhat unfortunately (because it does amount to a lot of work), that
is the current best practice, I believe. At any rate, this is exactly
what we do.
-john
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 12:12, Amato Massimiliano (TLAB) wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I am trying to convert our system from Ant to Maven, I m
Hello guys,
I am trying to convert our system from Ant to Maven, I managed to succesfully migrate
all the projects into Maven but right now i am facing the problem of the development
process integration.
I saw there is a Snapshot feature that upload the latest build to the repository, but
I am
25 matches
Mail list logo
