I allready tried this, but the generated archetype does not include modules
(only parent pom).
2007/5/3, Raphaël Piéroni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Try mvn -N archetypeng:create-from-project
Raphaël
2007/5/3, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to use the archetypeNG plugin from an ex
Try mvn -N archetypeng:create-from-project
Raphaël
2007/5/3, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm trying to use the archetypeNG plugin from an existing complex (multi
module) project.
The plugins ask me for archetype groupId and other properties on every
module of the source project. It ge
I'm trying to use the archetypeNG plugin from an existing complex (multi
module) project.
The plugins ask me for archetype groupId and other properties on every
module of the source project. It generates an archetype for every module.
I'd like to generate the complete project with modules from a
2007/5/3, Rémy Sanlaville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > what's the difference ?
> Mainly
> - the descriptor is changed
> - user is prompted for selecting the archetype and configuration
> (unless using -B)
> - any file can be resolved as packaged (using package in the directory
> resolution)
> - any
> what's the difference ?
Mainly
- the descriptor is changed
- user is prompted for selecting the archetype and configuration
(unless using -B)
- any file can be resolved as packaged (using package in the directory
resolution)
- any file can be resolved as binary (copied instead of velocity templ
2007/5/3, Rémy Sanlaville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
If I want to create an archetype, which one is better to use ?
If you want to create it right now, i would say the actual archetype
If you can wait for the archetypeng to have a first release
(i would say the archetype ng - but i'm obviously bi
Hi,
If I want to create an archetype, which one is better to use ?
what's the difference ?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/maven-archetypeng/
or
mvn archetype:create
-DgroupId=[your project's group id]
-DartifactId=[your project's artifact id]
-DarchetypeArtifactId=maven-archetype-archetype
(cf.
The current doco is a bit outdated (the descriptor is in refactoring now),
I will enhance it as soon as i have finished my current work on the features.
Raphaël
2007/5/2, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/2/07, Dave Hoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you give me a link to "...the 'ne
On 5/2/07, Dave Hoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you give me a link to "...the 'next generation' archetype
plugin that is going on over at Codehaus"?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/maven-archetypeng/
--
Wendy
-
To unsubscribe
Can you give me a link to "...the 'next generation' archetype
plugin that is going on over at Codehaus"?
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:10 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Guide to creating a
On 5/2/07, Dave Hoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The process given for creating a custom archetype seems limiting and
confusing.
I'd say limited and tedious. :)
Although my files do have this layout pattern when I run this archetype
I an error "Template 'trunk/src/main/java/App.java' not in
Hi Dave,
Currently, you can't add that folder.
Please feel free to raise a Jira.
Raphaël
2007/5/2, Dave Hoffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The process given for creating a custom archetype seems limiting and
confusing.
I want the standard maven directory layout but in addition I want to add
higher
2005/11/8, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:53 +0100, Alexander Hars wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Two weeks ago I wrote a significantly expanded Guide to Creating
> > Archetypes. It was immediately posted to CVS, but it is still not
> > available on the website.
>
> http://
On 11/8/05, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 15:11 +0200, Anuerin Diaz wrote:
> > maybe we can use http://wiki.apache.org/maven/ for a collaborative
> > effort? there is no specific wiki site for maven2 but from what i can
> > see that wiki is relatively unused by ma
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 15:11 +0200, Anuerin Diaz wrote:
> maybe we can use http://wiki.apache.org/maven/ for a collaborative
> effort? there is no specific wiki site for maven2 but from what i can
> see that wiki is relatively unused by maven1.
Anyone is welcome to use the wiki but we have a decent
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 08:02 -0500, Richard Allen wrote:
> I second that one. My biggest stumbling block so far with adopting Maven
> has been lack of documentation. However, I do understand how difficult
> it can be to get the docs written.
If there is something lacking then it is best to use on
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:53 +0100, Alexander Hars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two weeks ago I wrote a significantly expanded Guide to Creating
> Archetypes. It was immediately posted to CVS, but it is still not
> available on the website.
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-creating-archetypes.html
maybe we can use http://wiki.apache.org/maven/ for a collaborative
effort? there is no specific wiki site for maven2 but from what i can
see that wiki is relatively unused by maven1.
finalized documents could then be promoted to the official site as the
maintainers see fit. not everybody has ready
I second that one. My biggest stumbling block so far with adopting Maven
has been lack of documentation. However, I do understand how difficult
it can be to get the docs written.
Richard
Alexander Hars wrote:
Hi,
Two weeks ago I wrote a significantly expanded Guide to Creating
Archetypes.
19 matches
Mail list logo
