ne
Le 2023-02-16 à 11:58, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
Hi Stephane,
You can do like this
maven-surefire-plugin
3.0.0-M9
org
candidate, or not...
>
>
> I hope this helps to understand.
>
> regards,
>
>
> Stephane
>
>
> Le 2023-02-16 à 11:58, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany
> wrote:
> >>&g
023-02-16 à 11:58, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
>>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>>
>>>> You can do like this
>>>>
>>>>
>>&
ot...
I hope this helps to understand.
regards,
Stephane
Le 2023-02-16 à 11:58, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
Hi Stephane,
You can do like this
maven-surefire-plugin
Oh right, I thought he was going to fix something in surefire
There's also https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-attached-tests.html
-
- org.apache.maven.plugins
- maven-surefire-plugin
- ${surefire.ve
gt; https://scrum-master.de
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Olivier Lamy schrieb am 16.02.2023 um 11:58:
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >>>>>>
> &g
Lamy schrieb am 16.02.2023 um 11:58:
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>>>>>
>>>>
;
> >>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Stephane,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can do like this
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
b am 16.02.2023 um 11:58:
>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>>>
>>>>> You can do lik
; >>>
> >>> Hi Stephane,
> >>>
> >>> You can do like this
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> maven-surefire-plugin
> >>> 3.0.0-M9
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stephane,
>>>
>>> You can do like this
>>>
>>>
>>> maven-surefire-plugin
>>>
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:52, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephane,
> >
> > You can do like this
> >
> >
> > maven-surefire-plugin
> > 3.0.0-M9
> >
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 20:07, Delany wrote:
>
> Hi Stephane,
>
> You can do like this
>
>
> maven-surefire-plugin
> 3.0.0-M9
>
>
> org.apache.commons
>
Hi Stephane,
You can do like this
maven-surefire-plugin
3.0.0-M9
org.apache.commons
commons-email
1.5
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 11:25, Stephane Passignat
wrote:
> He
Hello,
Is it possible to add a maven artifact as an additionalClasspathElement ?
I tried this syntax, inspired by the exclusion mechanism, but it's not
working.
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-plugin
3.0
Hi Everyone,
I'm currently creating a package from where I would want to set JUnit
parallel execution parameters like below :
*classesAndMethods
1
1
false*
I'm planning to use Instrumentation API to inject these parameters. I tried
to find the correct place where I can do so, but failed to find
suggests otherwise:
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/history.html - maybe it
should give an ETA or the number of upcoming milestones…
BTW the release notes link on the m-s-p subsite is broken.
BTW in maven numbing the -M qualifiers will sort before the unqualified 3.0.0
Hello
Are "M" versions of the Surefire plugin (like 3.0.0-M7) pre-release?
Should one use "M" versions or the latest version without "M" (2.22.2)?
Usually, I see "M" as a "Milestone," which is pre-release, but I want to be
sure this time.
Unf
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M6.
The release contains 111 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in the form of bug
reports and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
https
Yes it looks that way. I changed the system jdk to 16 and now I can pick a
jdk with the toolchains plugin and without any surefire config.
Its basically https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOOLCHAINS-28 all over
again but with surefire-plugin
Want a ticket?
Delany
On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 at 17:50
Aug 26, 2021 at 3:32 PM Delany wrote:
> Hi. Im having trouble with the jdkToolchain feature of
> maven-surefire-plugin
>
> https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/toolchains.html
> This is my working build tag
>
>
>
>
va9 with toolchains.xml
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/java9.html
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-toolchains-plugin
1.1
validate
toolchain
9
On Thu,
Hi. Im having trouble with the jdkToolchain feature of maven-surefire-plugin
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/toolchains.html
This is my working build tag
maven-compiler-plugin
8
We will do our best as well. On one hand TeamCity uses flowId based on
Thread ID, the surefire plugin can use a similar mechanism we used before
in surefire-junit47-provider and we can identify the lines of system output
by Thread ID.
T
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:31 PM Jay Crosley wrote:
>
er issue you may be facing. We are
approaching the fix step by step.
Cheers
Tibor
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:04 PM Jay Crosley wrote:
> I’m trying to get junit5 tests to run in parallel using the maven surefire
> plugin, as described on
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2
by step.
Cheers
Tibor
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:04 PM Jay Crosley wrote:
> I’m trying to get junit5 tests to run in parallel using the maven surefire
> plugin, as described on
> https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/fork-options-and-parallel-execution.html.
&
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:18 PM Jay Crosley wrote:
> I take it back, the maven-failsafe-plugin works with the junit
> configuration options you suggested. That was the one combination I hadn’t
> tried. Woo hoo!
>
I should have mentioned: there are no other configuration settings
necessary.
Best
I take it back, the maven-failsafe-plugin works with the junit configuration
options you suggested. That was the one combination I hadn’t tried. Woo hoo!
From: Laird Nelson
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 4:01 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Maven surefire plugin: parallel
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Jay Crosley wrote:
> Thank you. That looked promising but alas, I get the same result. I tried
> those with and without the other surefire configurations for running
> parallel tests. I also tried (from browsing the web) the
> maven-failsafe-plugin with the various
.
From: Laird Nelson
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 at 2:56 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Maven surefire plugin: parallel configuration not running tests in
parallel
JUnit5 does this in a strange way and they don't make it obvious.
Try a recipe like this:
maven-surefire-p
JUnit5 does this in a strange way and they don't make it obvious.
Try a recipe like this:
maven-surefire-plugin
junit.jupiter.execution.parallel.enabled=true
junit.jupiter.execution.parallel.mode.default=concurrent
Best,
Lair
I’m trying to get junit5 tests to run in parallel using the maven surefire
plugin, as described on
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/fork-options-and-parallel-execution.html.
Despite configuration that looks correct, I can’t get them to run in parallel.
I’ll
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M5.
The release contains 40 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in the form of bug
reports and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
Hello,
I uploaded this simple project to illustrate my observation:
https://github.com/gabalawi/junit5-testreporter
Maybe someone could help me with clarifying
- if there is a bug or lacking feature in the surefire plugin
- or if I did not properly configure the surefire plugin
- or if it is up
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M4.
The release contains 43 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
ug 22, 2019 at 11:38 PM Walid Bounouar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am just wondering if there is a timeline for the release of the
> surefire-plugin version 3.0.0-M4 or if there's a way for me to track such a
> thing?
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> Walid Bounouar
>
Hi,
I am just wondering if there is a timeline for the release of the
surefire-plugin version 3.0.0-M4 or if there's a way for me to track such a
thing?
Thanks for the help!
Walid Bounouar
t; Hi,
> >
> > I am a beginner and just started to learn maven for my project. I was
> > reading about surefire plugin on the site and found this -
> >
> > image.png
> >
> > As I see here, there are 3 goals in this plugin but why does it say there
> >
Hello Moina,
I have reported this issue in JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1684
Cheers
Tibor17
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:26 PM Moina Farheen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a beginner and just started to learn maven for my project. I was
> reading about surefire plugin
t;
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:26 PM Moina Farheen
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am a beginner and just started to learn maven for my project. I was
> > reading about surefire plugin on the site and found this -
> >
> > image.png
> >
> > As
rk around for SUREFIRE-2
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-257>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:26 PM Moina Farheen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a beginner and just started to learn maven for my project. I was
> reading about surefire plugin on the site and found this -
&g
Hi,
I am a beginner and just started to learn maven for my project. I was
reading about surefire plugin on the site and found this -
image.png
As I see here, there are 3 goals in this plugin but why does it say there
"Surefire Report Plugin only has one goal"
Have I misunderstood?
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.22.2.
The release contains 1 bug fix about JUnit 5 Compatibility
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http
Well this escalated quickly :) Now to find some time to look at this.
I'll pull the plugin code later
On 6 Apr 2019, at 19:52, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Mark, do not forget to update documentation with certain usecase(s).
> Configure your tool (prefer IntelliJ IDEA) with code style, see the
gt;
>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/compile-mojo.html#jdkToolchain
>>>
>>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 23:54:38 +0200, Tibor Digana
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > You can use Toolchain with Failsafe plugin:
>>> > https://
>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/compile-mojo.html#jdkToolchain
>>
>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 23:54:38 +0200, Tibor Digana
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > You can use Toolchain with Failsafe plugin:
>> > https
, 04 Apr 2019 23:54:38 +0200, Tibor Digana
>
> wrote:
>
> > You can use Toolchain with Failsafe plugin:
> > https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/java9.html
> > but you can configure multiple executions and phases for the
> > maven-toolc
/compile-mojo.html#jdkToolchain
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 23:54:38 +0200, Tibor Digana
wrote:
You can use Toolchain with Failsafe plugin:
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/java9.html
but you can configure multiple executions and phases for the
maven-toolchains-plugin.
On Thu
You can use Toolchain with Failsafe plugin:
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/java9.html
but you can configure multiple executions and phases for the
maven-toolchains-plugin.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:09 PM Mark Derricutt wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2019, at 6:29, Robert Scho
On 5 Apr 2019, at 6:29, Robert Scholte wrote:
> If you want to test the jar, you must use the failsafe plugin (or bind
> surefire to the integration-test phase)
Can/could failsafe take a toolchain id as config, then you could configure
additional executions using each toolchain you wanted?
--
tps://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/multirelease.html
On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:14:58 +0200, Russell Gold
wrote:
As of 3.8.0, the maven-compiler-plugin will place javaNNN source under
META-INF/versions/NNN, which makes them ready for the jar plugin. But
the surefire plugin ig
ce under
>> META-INF/versions/NNN, which makes them ready for the jar plugin. But the
>> surefire plugin ignores them! Is there a way to get the surefire plugin to
>> run against them? They would need to be added on the class path ahead of the
>> main output directory. I
14:58 +0200, Russell Gold
wrote:
As of 3.8.0, the maven-compiler-plugin will place javaNNN source under
META-INF/versions/NNN, which makes them ready for the jar plugin. But
the surefire plugin ignores them! Is there a way to get the surefire
plugin to run against them? They would need
As of 3.8.0, the maven-compiler-plugin will place javaNNN source under
META-INF/versions/NNN, which makes them ready for the jar plugin. But the
surefire plugin ignores them! Is there a way to get the surefire plugin to run
against them? They would need to be added on the class path ahead of
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M3.
The release contains 6 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M2.
The release contains 15 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
Hello,
At Apache Wicket we hit issue described here
https://stackoverflow.com/a/53016532/1676516
(tests fails when OpenJDK 8u181 is used)
To fix it we have tried to update maven-surefire-plugin (2.20 -> 3.0.0-M1)
Tests for one module (CDI-1.1) fails for both OpenJDK and OracleJDK
I tried to
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 3.0.0-M1
The release contains 5 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.22.1
The release contains 17 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org/plugins
Hi,
> I want to test my JPMS module using maven surefire plugin (2.22)
> with junit5. For this I added the following to my pom:
>
> ...
>
>org.junit.jupiter
>junit-jupiter-engine
>5.3
Hi all,
I want to test my JPMS module using maven surefire plugin (2.22) with junit5.
For this I added the following to my pom:
...
org.junit.jupiter
junit-jupiter-engine
5.3.0
test
I hope someone within the list can either guide me to the answer I'm
looking for or help me identify what I'm doing incorrectly.
I'm using the surefire-plugin (v2.21.0). I have setup a maven profile to
run my tests in parallel. Here is my configuration
org.apache.maven.pl
how the parameter is set in this plugin.
T
On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Jun Huang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently in our hadoop project, we added maven-surefire-plugin for running
> unit tests by categories.
>
> in hadoop root pom.xml:
>
>
Hi Folks,
I've seen some OutOfMemory recently in the surefire plugin while running
testng tests.
I took the dump for one of the issues and apparently the surefire plugin
keeps every single entry of the log in memory, which is finally causing
the OutOfMemory. This is what Eclipse M
Hi Folks,
I've seen some OutOfMemory recently in the surefire plugin while running testng
tests.
I took the dump for one of the issues and apparently the surefire plugin keeps
every single entry of the log in memory, which is finally causing the
OutOfMemory. This is what Eclipse M
Is it possible to register a custom writer with the maven-surefire-plugin?
let me know.
thank you.
—Z
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.21.0.
The release contains 33 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.21.0.
The release contains 33 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.20.1
The release contains 24 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org/plugins
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.20.
The release contains 70 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org/plugins
I tried many combinations but couldn't make it shorter with the same behavior :(
- ph ---
Just a small hint about the concept of includes/excludes.
A test is executed if and only if it matches any include (or all if there
are no includes) AND doesn't match any exclude.
The problem I see is that
execution-block you kind of fixed that.
Robert
Regards,
- Paul
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
When you only want to change the pom (not the tests), a set of
executionblocks will do the trick:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-
hange the pom (not the tests), a set of
> executionblocks will do the trick:
>
>
> org.apache.maven.plugins
> maven-surefire-plugin
> 2.18.1
>
>
> unit-tests
>
When you only want to change the pom (not the tests), a set of
executionblocks will do the trick:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-plugin
2.18.1
unit-tests
**/*Unit*.java
I'd say you could add executions to the surefire plugin with different
categories:
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/examples/junit.html#Using_JUnit_Categories
Look at this gist (I've omitted some details):
https://gist.github.com/kewne/2b909ab5e8035a4e44e406
ionOrder=unit,integration,functional
-DstopBuildAtExecutionBoundariesForTestFailures
... and shave seconds off the build.
How do I configure that tersely and elegantly in the surefire plugin today?
any way to run tests by attaching to an existing
process? So that tests can use the attached process environment.
I found surefire has JVMproperty, found here
<http://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#jvm>,
but could not get how to set it, if this is c
Hi,
Need your help as i have been struggling with parallel execution using
maven. i am trying to run Testng tests in parallel, maven V3.3.9,
maven-surefire-plugin V2.18.1, with the below configuration
testng.xml
classes
10
or 10
But, tests aren't running in parallel. Need your inpu
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.19.1
The release contains 17 bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http://maven.apache.org/plugins
Hello everyone, :-)
ehm, okay, forget it. I found the solution. I need the following configuration
for the surefire plugin:
C:\Program Files\jdk1.7.0_80\bin\java
The "forkCount" has to be 1. 0 would use the current JVM. As 1 is the default
value it is not necessary to co
ntrol the Java version used by the
surefire plugin for the JUnit tests.
Example:
The default Java is 8 while Java 7 should be used as target for the
build.
For the compiler plugin I can configure the following:
1.7
1.7
C:\Program
Files
orked process
+ improvements in JUnit and TestNG runners
+ etc.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-plugin
2.19
or for failsafe:
org.apache.mav
Hi,
I want to execute in parallel the 2 TestNG suites.Actually with this config the
first suite is executed and then the second suite.I have tried with
2 but no change.
I have searched but I didn't find a solution.Could you explain me how to do
that?
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-sur
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.18.1
The release contains a number of bug fixes.
Again we received contributions from the community in form of bug reports
and bug fixes.
Thank you and keep them coming!
http
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.18
The release contains a number of bug fixes, and introduces an option to
automatically rerun failing tests, including proper reporting on the
console and in the XML reports for the individual
Hi good morning all,
I have asked this question on stackoverflow two days ago about the
necessity of defining / overriding the maven-surefire-plugin.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26694974/why-maven-surefire-plugin-needs-to-be-defined-for-the-tests-to-be-run
I didn't get any answer s
Hi Colleagues,
Is there a possibility the surefire-plugin to count all successful
subtest(verify statements) for Junit tests.
Here is the describing of the problem:
> Imagine you have two tests, with each having 5 verify statements
> If both tests succeed, the test result will show two
; 2.10 is rather old. Could you try it with a more recent version such as
> 2.17?
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 schrieb David Hoffer :
>
> > I have a module where maven-surefire-plugin (2.10) is configured to use
> > TestNG and JUnit47. The former has seve
Hi,
2.10 is rather old. Could you try it with a more recent version such as
2.17?
Am Donnerstag, 11. September 2014 schrieb David Hoffer :
> I have a module where maven-surefire-plugin (2.10) is configured to use
> TestNG and JUnit47. The former has several tests that all succeed a
I have a module where maven-surefire-plugin (2.10) is configured to use
TestNG and JUnit47. The former has several tests that all succeed and the
later has two tests that fail. However the build succeeds. How can I
configure surefire so the build fails if either have failures which is the
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Surefire Plugin, version 2.17
This release comes with some smaller improvements and bug fixes for TestNG,
for the JUnit Parallel Computer, the removal of temporary files, and last
but not least it fixes a compatibility
g testng:6.8.7 and maven-surefire-plugin:2.16.
>
> The first test class has the following annotation on the test *class* which
> should be inherited by the test methods:
>
> * @Test(groups={ "functional" })*
> * public class FuncTest{...}*
>
> on the
I'm having a frustrating test dependency issue and I don't know if it is my
configuration or a problem. I've got two test classes in my maven project
using testng:6.8.7 and maven-surefire-plugin:2.16.
The first test class has the following annotation on the test *class* which
shou
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, John Dix wrote:
> Thanks laird... I got 2.4.3. Do you know where I can find the release
> notes for the various versions to see the list of changes made between then
> and now?
>
This is the closest thing I found:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE#selecte
Subject: Re: surefire plugin output changes
No, that's the latest version of maven-surefire-plugin.
Run mvn help:effective-pom from a pom.xml in your project and look for the
stanza that concerns the maven-surefire-plugin and that will tell you for sure.
Best,
Laird
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at
No, that's the latest version of maven-surefire-plugin.
Run mvn help:effective-pom from a pom.xml in your project and look for the
stanza that concerns the maven-surefire-plugin and that will tell you for
sure.
Best,
Laird
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:06 AM, John Dix wrote:
> I got it
I got it... 2.16
-Original Message-
From: John Dix
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:45 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: RE: surefire plugin output changes
Do you know which version Maven 2.1.0 had?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno
Do you know which version Maven 2.1.0 had?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:56 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: surefire plugin output changes
3.0.3 defaulted to surefire 2.7.2 if you did not
ohn Dix
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:35 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: surefire plugin output changes
>
> Hello all,
>
> We have migrated our maven from version 3.0.3 to 3.0.5 and our developers
> are claiming now that they're not seeing the verbosity in the t
where that could account for
this.
-Original Message-
From: John Dix
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 4:35 PM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: surefire plugin output changes
Hello all,
We have migrated our maven from version 3.0.3 to 3.0.5 and our developers are
claiming now that they're
1 - 100 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
