If you expect a response to this email, you'll need to explain things.
I'm not a fan of attachments.
Wayne
On 11/20/07, Travis Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional co
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
4.0.0
com.dolby.atlassian.confluence
confluence-soap-model
jar
Atlassian CON
On 1/16/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
When I browse the http://repo1.maven.org today, I found there are two repos:
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse (Containing eclipse jars)
this is a test repo for eclipse bundles, you can use it for testing
http://repo1.maven.org/maven-java
Hi,
When I browse the http://repo1.maven.org today, I found there are two repos:
http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse (Containing eclipse jars)
http://repo1.maven.org/maven-java.net/ (Containing javax and com.ibm.sun jars)
Are these new repos that we can reference for Eclipse and Sun artifacts? Does
Hi,
with J2EE now named Java EE, shall also the guideline for the library be
changed?
From
Product artifact Group ID Artifact ID
J2EE javax.j2ee j2ee
To
Product artifact Group ID Artifact ID
Java EE javax.javaee javaee
Andreas
-
FYI, I have sent feedback to Sun requesting that the J2EE Connector
Architecture class files be rereleased under the CDDL. We'll see where this
goes...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-M2--Request-for-Sun-jars-to-be-added-to-ibiblio-m2-repo-tf1977662.html#a5512591
is the latest & greatest, as far as I know.
I'll check to see if they are now released under CDDL, unless anyone else
knowsanyone? Bueller...? Three letters...? Starts with 'y'...?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-M2--Request-for-Sun-jars-to-be-a
jars?
Wayne
On 7/20/06, matthewadams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was wondering if the powers that be could add the Sun jars for JTA
(javax.transaction/jta/1.0.1) and Connector
(javax.resource/connector-api/1.5) to the central ibiblio maven2 repo. I
see that JTA 1.0.1B is there; can the pr
I was wondering if the powers that be could add the Sun jars for JTA
(javax.transaction/jta/1.0.1) and Connector
(javax.resource/connector-api/1.5) to the central ibiblio maven2 repo. I
see that JTA 1.0.1B is there; can the previous two versions be added as well
(1.0.1A, 1.0.1)?
Thanks,
Matthew
Thank you
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
To: "Maven Users List"
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 1:18 PM
Subject: Sun jars revisited
What version numbers do you guys use when installing these in your
repository?Is this an individual choice...like the wild west :) ?I'm
looking at the manifest file for (eg ) jaxrpc.jar
looks like 1.1, although it may be a minor revision like 1.1.1 or 1.1.2
On 6/28/06, Jeff Mutonho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What version numbers do you guys use when installing these in your
repository?Is this an individual choice...like the wild west :) ?I'm
looking at the manifest file for (eg
What version numbers do you guys use when installing these in your
repository?Is this an individual choice...like the wild west :) ?I'm
looking at the manifest file for (eg ) jaxrpc.jar and it says :
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.5.3
Created-By: 1.4.2_05-b04 (Sun Microsystems In
1.1 is final. http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/jaf/downloads/index.html
On 5/4/06, Thorsten Heit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wayne,
> Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
> recently uploaded two
On 5/3/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I see any relevant JIRA
emails, so I thought I'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I think these are the only releases that can be put in maven's
> repositories,
> as they are the first releases (of these two products) which use the CDDL
> license (instead of the old one which doesn't permit distributing them in
> maven's repo with
en Heit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wayne,
> Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
> recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
> discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I see an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Wayne,
> Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
> recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
> discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I see any relevant JIRA
> emails, so I thou
Very good news!
Wayne Fay wrote:
Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I see any relevant JIRA
emails, so I thought I'd send this notification t
way too cool !!
On 5/3/06, Arik Kfir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is excellent news! Thank you Carlos and Koshuke!
On 5/3/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
> recently uploaded two new Sun jars
This is excellent news! Thank you Carlos and Koshuke!
On 5/3/06, Wayne Fay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I s
Just wanted to post and let everyone know that Carlos Sanchez has
recently uploaded two new Sun jars into the Maven repos. This was not
discussed on the User or Dev list, nor did I see any relevant JIRA
emails, so I thought I'd send this notification to the Users list
myself.
Here's th
> A screen scraper would be acceptable. This has been discussed but by the
> time we finally determined that I had lost interest.
I am an advocate of whatever steps we can take to make the end-user's
life easier, but I wanted to make an observation about that idea.
I don't believe it will be as
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 04:16:09PM +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> On 10/20/05, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:25:31PM +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> > > You will not believe it, but this is also required for standard dtds
> > > and xsds (like the web.x
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:32:14AM -0700, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 04:10 -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> > On a side note, any idea whether JSR 277 will be developped in an open
> > fashion, with an open source RI, like the concurrency JSR was?
>
> That's up to the spec lead (
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 13:25 +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> Some more thoughts...
>
> The same problem with Sun licenses was recently addressed also by
> Eclipse. They implemented a click-through mechanism where the user
> must accept the sun license everytime a file is requested from a sun
> se
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 04:10 -0700, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> On a side note, any idea whether JSR 277 will be developped in an open
> fashion, with an open source RI, like the concurrency JSR was?
That's up to the spec lead (Stanley Ho), but we are still designing so
no code has been written yet. I'
On 10/20/05, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 01:25:31PM +0200, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
> > You will not believe it, but this is also required for standard dtds
> > and xsds (like the web.xml schema)... according to Sun any xml editor
> > which reads the xsd decla
On 10/20/05, Mike Perham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason why people can't use the geronimo-spec jars? I
> discovered these a few months back and never looked back. I doubt they
> have a spec jar for everything under the sun but importing their j2ee
> 1.4 jar should solve 90% of
Is there some reason why people can't use the geronimo-spec jars? I
discovered these a few months back and never looked back. I doubt they
have a spec jar for everything under the sun but importing their j2ee
1.4 jar should solve 90% of people's problems...
mike
ema)... according to Sun any xml editor
> which reads the xsd declaration in an xml file and tries to download
> it for validation without prompting for the license could be
> considered illegal?!?
That's a new one. Got an URL ?
> Maybe somebody would came up with an unofficial reposi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:54:49PM -0400, Brill Pappin wrote:
> Yah, its a bit of a gray area though... I could write a plugin that used
> each of the libs in question in some way and distribute the plugin... the
> user would then have it in the environment.
>
No, you can't. The license demands t
build your own application, while
probably it could be legally done if you consider Spring a final
product which needs these jars to work.
Following the same consideration, maven could be considered as a build
tool and in order to work ( = to be able to compile artifacts) it
needs the sun jars. I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:52:33PM -0700, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:40 +0200, Tomasz Pik wrote:
> > On 19/10/05, Marcel Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Couldn't someone from the maven development team ask Sun for their
> > > explicit permission to publish all these ja
Yah, its a bit of a gray area though... I could write a plugin that used
each of the libs in question in some way and distribute the plugin... the
user would then have it in the environment.
Hmm... anyone want to write an email plugin?
- Brill Pappin
On 10/19/05, Arik Kfir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:40 +0200, Tomasz Pik wrote:
> On 19/10/05, Marcel Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Couldn't someone from the maven development team ask Sun for their
> > explicit permission to publish all these jars? As we say in Holland:
> > 'Nee heb je, ja kun je krijgen' ('No you'
I'm glad to see that its still in process... I'm very sure Sun doesn't want
to block use of the libs by Maven but I can see the bind they are in...
Maybe the Apache group could agree to "mirror" the libs which would mean
they would need to provide an interactive way for the lic to be accepted,
but
On 19/10/05, Marcel Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couldn't someone from the maven development team ask Sun for their
> explicit permission to publish all these jars? As we say in Holland:
> 'Nee heb je, ja kun je krijgen' ('No you've got, yes you can get').
Here's link to story: http://mave
Couldn't someone from the maven development team ask Sun for their
explicit permission to publish all these jars? As we say in Holland:
'Nee heb je, ja kun je krijgen' ('No you've got, yes you can get').
Marcel
--- Arik Kfir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, you are right. It wouldn't make much
Yes, you are right. It wouldn't make much sense if you couldn't
redistribute them, eh? ;-)
Still, it prohibits the maven team from putting them on ibiblio (arrggh!)
On 10/19/05, Brill Pappin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure that the case? Last time I looked you could distribute them as
Are you sure that the case? Last time I looked you could distribute them as
part of your application, but could not distribute them as themselves... the
difference being that you as the application developer have agreed to abide
by the license.
I may be wrong, but I don't think your restricted to
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 03:05:06PM +0200, Nicolas De Loof wrote:
>
> I think the only legal way to build a download script would be to use a
> console mode browser to follow the $BIGCORP download process. But I
> don't think sun download process may be clean viewed on a console mode
> browser.
From: "Arik Kfir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd suggest not putting them in your local repo by hand, but use:
m2 install:install-file
-Dfile=
-DgroupId=
-DartifactId=
-Dversion=
-Dpackaging=
(all in one line of course)
A very simple GUI that lets you navigate to the location of
and
I think the only legal way to build a download script would be to use a
console mode browser to follow the $BIGCORP download process. But I
don't think sun download process may be clean viewed on a console mode
browser.
Another solution maybe to patch a graphical browser like hotjava to
lan
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:15:53PM +0200, Arik Kfir wrote:
> No, that's ok. The license prohibits you from *redistributing* the
> JAR. As long as its for your own use, you're fine.
Depends. In general, people writing non-free licenses make them
click-wrap so that they can enforce the restrictions
> -Original Message-
> From: Arik Kfir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
>
> No, that's ok. The license prohibits you from *redistributing* the
> JAR. As long as its for your own use, you're fine.
>
Ok let's get right to the point.
What about redistributing the download script?
> On 10
No, that's ok. The license prohibits you from *redistributing* the
JAR. As long as its for your own use, you're fine.
On 10/18/05, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ====
> >
> >
> > You have to download
> -Original Message-
> From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====
>
>
> You have to download these jars yourself (due to license
> issues) and put
> them in your local repo by hand:
>
> http://maven.apache.org/reference/standard-sun-jar-names.html
>
Does the licence restr
Oh...no, I don't think so ;-)
On 10/18/05, Lukas Theussl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking in terms of m1. :)
>
> Is there an equivalent of install:install-file in m1?
>
> -Lukas
>
>
> Arik Kfir wrote:
> > I'd suggest not putting them in your local repo by hand, but use:
> >
> > m2 insta
I was thinking in terms of m1. :)
Is there an equivalent of install:install-file in m1?
-Lukas
Arik Kfir wrote:
I'd suggest not putting them in your local repo by hand, but use:
m2 install:install-file
-Dfile=
-DgroupId=
-DartifactId=
-Dversion=
-Dpackaging=
(all in one line of co
I'd suggest not putting them in your local repo by hand, but use:
m2 install:install-file
-Dfile=
-DgroupId=
-DartifactId=
-Dversion=
-Dpackaging=
(all in one line of course)
Where: the path to the file to load
the group that the file should be registered under
You have to download these jars yourself (due to license issues) and put
them in your local repo by hand:
http://maven.apache.org/reference/standard-sun-jar-names.html
-Lukas
Xavier Toth wrote:
I'm sorry if this has already been addressed but my dependencies for things
like activation and ma
Due to licensing issues you have to copy these libs to your local repo
(or an internal repo) manually. For m1 this page defined suggests the
groupIds / artifactIds to use:
http://maven.apache.org/reference/standard-sun-jar-names.html
I think the suggested names stay the same with m2 though the
Hi Xavier,
These JARs are not in the repository because they can't be
redistributed. You need to download them from Sun's site (at
http://java.sun.com) and install them manually in your local
repository.
See http://maven.apache.org/maven2/general.html#importing-jars for
manually installing JARs i
I'm sorry if this has already been addressed but my dependencies for things
like activation and mail fail to download the jars because they aren't in
the repositiory. Where are others getting these type of jars?
erlin/distributions
Nathan Coast wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if there had been any movement on the licensing of sun
jars recently?
http://maven.apache.org/sun-licensing-journey.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00641.html
Until such a time as these jars become available via mave
Hi,
Just wondering if there had been any movement on the licensing of sun
jars recently?
http://maven.apache.org/sun-licensing-journey.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00641.html
Until such a time as these jars become available via maven (if they ever
do) what is the best
57 matches
Mail list logo
