Hi guys,
first of all thank you for the replies.
> You will find that in JDEV_HOME/bin and you deploy from JDEV_HOME/j2ee/home
>
> The OC4J_ don't share the same ADF or TRINIDAD (and perhaps more) with
> JDEV R3 or R4 so until we get an actual release (they're still in Beta) we
> have to use
PROTECTED] | www.mizar.com | (360) 945-2643
From: Scott O'Bryam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:28 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Cc: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: JDeveloper
Different JSF versions. You can use the app server included in jdev.
Sent from my iPh
Different JSF versions. You can use the app server included in jdev.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 27, 2008, at 5:48 PM, "Edward Dowgiallo"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just use a 10g application server.
Ed
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Vanni G. Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi guys,
Just use a 10g application server.
Ed
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Vanni G. Rizzo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've a little problem: i haven't found an oracle application server 11g.
> I don't know how to deploy my application done with Jdev 11 g Tech
> preview...
> Someone can
Hi guys,
I've a little problem: i haven't found an oracle application server 11g.
I don't know how to deploy my application done with Jdev 11 g Tech preview...
Someone can help me?
--
Vanni
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool, I havn't had a chance to try out Ganymede yet
it is good :)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> By the way, Eclipse Ganymede has pretty nice support for Trinidad
>> regarding auto-completion if you down
Cool, I havn't had a chance to try out Ganymede yet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
By the way, Eclipse Ganymede has pretty nice support for Trinidad
regarding auto-completion if you download the WTP plugins
and define your web project as Dynamic Web Project (and, optionally,
setup *.xhtml
Hi,
By the way, Eclipse Ganymede has pretty nice support for Trinidad
regarding auto-completion if you download the WTP plugins
and define your web project as Dynamic Web Project (and, optionally, setup
*.xhtml as JSP source otherwise use *.jspx or the like as prearranged
extension).
Best wish
Hi guys,
> Yeah, nothing wrong with bleeding edge.. :)
:) i'll try to convince my boss!
bye
--
§ Vanni G. Rizzo
§ cell: 3293247242 - tel: 095 659561
§ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt developing my projects using JDeveloper
Tecnology Preview?
thanks,
--
Vanni
a tecnology preview! My problems are here..
> Do you suggest to start developing my projects using JDeveloper
> Tecnology Preview?
>
> thanks,
>
> --
> Vanni
>
Hi Matthias,
> there was a recent technology preview #4 ...
I know, but it is still a tecnology preview! My problems are here..
Do you suggest to start developing my projects using JDeveloper
Tecnology Preview?
thanks,
--
Vanni
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Vanni G. Rizzo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thank you or the reply.
>
>> Oracle 11g has support for Trinidad.
>
> i know that 11g has more cool features than 10g, but i'm using 10g (
> 11g is a "one year old" tecnology preview)
there was a recent tech
Hi Scott,
thank you or the reply.
> Oracle 11g has support for Trinidad.
i know that 11g has more cool features than 10g, but i'm using 10g (
11g is a "one year old" tecnology preview)
thanks,
--
Vanni
Vanni,
Oracle 11g has support for Trinidad. As for MyFaces, the built in
application server has JSF built in, so it technically uses the R.I..
There is no reason you couldn't use myfaces with a tomcat installation
though and debug using JDeveloper...
Scott
Vanni G. Rizzo wrote:
Hi to all,
i'm fresh in JSF developing and i want to learn using JSF with
JDeveloeper and Oracle Database.
It's possible to use Trinidad or MyFaces in my JSF JDeveloper (future) works?
I need something like Tabs, Popup box, calendars, etc... and i've seen
that the Oracle AD
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:46 -0400, Ziegler, Irina wrote:
> I am trying to use Tomahawk dataScroller in JDeveloper, but it looks
> like I have rendering problem. (Tomahawk 1.1.6, JDeveloper TP3)
>
> In the next and previous buttons image tag is not inside of the link
> tag (i
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:46 -0400, Ziegler, Irina wrote:
> I am trying to use Tomahawk dataScroller in JDeveloper, but it looks
> like I have rendering problem. (Tomahawk 1.1.6, JDeveloper TP3)
>
> In the next and previous buttons image tag is not inside of the link
> tag (it ma
I am trying to use Tomahawk dataScroller in JDeveloper, but it looks
like I have rendering problem. (Tomahawk 1.1.6, JDeveloper TP3)
In the next and previous buttons image tag is not inside of the link tag
(it makes buttons not clickable).
Buttons are rendered as following:
< img
Hello,
JDeveloper maven plugin is generating test projects even if there are no
tests available in a module. Could someone please let me know how I can
configure the plugin to avoid this scenario?
Thanks
Bala Raman
Tomax Corporation
Phone: 801-924-6283
Fax: 801.415.6583
Bandaru,
don't think that the jsf-impl has anything to do with the problems you
see (but don't mention). Note that JSF 1.2 is supported in JDeveloper 11
Frank
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bandaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 22, 2007 12:55 PM
Subject:
Hi,
I Building Application in JDeveloper 10.1.3.2 IDE with Trinidad
and jsf components.
Using the following libs
JSP Runtime
Jsf-api.jar
Jsf-impl.jar-->(1.1)
Trinidad-api-1.0.1.jar
Trinidad-impl-1.0.1.jar
JSTL 1.1
while Designing jspx pa
nidad in Oracle
> JDeveloper :-)
>
> I am using this libraries:
>
> commons-beanutils-1.6.jar
> commons-collections-2.0.jar
> commons-logging-1.0.jar
> jsf-facelets-1.1.6.jar
> trinidad-api-1.0.1-SNAPSHOOT.jar
> trinidad-impl-1.0.1-SNAPSHOOT.jar
>
> But I have
Hi,
I have feeling, that I am there alone who use Trinidad in Oracle
JDeveloper :-)
I am using this libraries:
commons-beanutils-1.6.jar
commons-collections-2.0.jar
commons-logging-1.0.jar
jsf-facelets-1.1.6.jar
trinidad-api-1.0.1-SNAPSHOOT.jar
trinidad-impl-1.0.1-SNAPSHOOT.jar
But I have
Use the newer ones - 1.0.1.
regards,
Martin
On 8/10/07, Bandaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>I am new to the Trinidad components.
> i'm trying to configure the trinidad in oracle Jdeveloper 10g.
>i found different versions of libraries
Hi,
I am new to the Trinidad components.
i'm trying to configure the trinidad in oracle Jdeveloper 10g.
i found different versions of libraries in the sites,can any one one
suggest me which libraries are to use.
I have used the libraries given in "Apache MyFaces Trin
Hello all,
I have a still problem with Trinidad Tag library loading on second run
of JDeveloper. When tag library is created in Manage Library dialog,
then all is OK. After close and open JDeveloper there are errors on JSP
pages with Trinidad components. I must recreate tag library definition
Hi Scott, Hi Adam,
Thanks so much for your input. It has been very valuable.
Scott, would it be possible to get more information on the Proof of
concept you setup with Trinidad & JDeveloper 11? I have downloaded the
technology preview and there appears to be much better integration with
eetings,
I was wondering if I could leverage some knowledge / experiences out
there
regarding exposing a Trinidad JSF app as a Portlet within JDeveloper
10.1.3.2 & the pre-configured Webcenter OC4J.
I was easily able to expose a Sun Reference Implementation JSF
application
as a Portlet,
Chris,
Using Oracle's bridge and ADFm, you need to add Oracle's 10.1.3.2
lifecycle listeners to your portlet.xml. This "should" work, although
the Proof of Concept for Trinidad was used with JDeveloper 11 so I
haven't actually tested this out. I DO know that, for
ld leverage some knowledge / experiences out there
regarding exposing a Trinidad JSF app as a Portlet within JDeveloper
10.1.3.2 & the pre-configured Webcenter OC4J.
I was easily able to expose a Sun Reference Implementation JSF application
as a Portlet, using the Faces Portlet Bridge, and
Greetings,
I was wondering if I could leverage some knowledge / experiences out
there regarding exposing a Trinidad JSF app as a Portlet within
JDeveloper 10.1.3.2 & the pre-configured Webcenter OC4J.
I was easily able to expose a Sun Reference Implementation JSF
application as a Portlet, u
Hi Mike,
Have been on vacation to Maui :) and I couldn't see any reply to your
email. I wrote a HowTo a while back on how to use MyFaces with
JDeveloper, but it is a bit outdated. Essentially, to get it to work
you add the myfaces libraries to your project BEFOR you start adding
JSF pag
Does anyone have a link to a tutorial or blog entry on using MyFaces with
Oracle's JDeveloper?
Thx.
Mike
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Yee CN schrieb:
> Eclipse + myEclipseIDE is performing OK. For one thing eclipse is not
> opening every file you have - only the ones you left opened in your last
> session. For that matter starting up time is rather independent of the size
> of the project.
>
> In my 3yr old notebook eclipse + my
Yee CN schrieb:
> Is there any supports for Facelets in JDeveloper or JSC? I am using
> MyEclipse – and I am seriously looking for an alternative.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yee
>
There is only one IDE I am aware of with some facelets support, and that
one is Exadel. Gi
PROTECTED] Auftrag
> von Igor Marakov
> Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Marz 2006 20:13
> An: 'MyFaces Discussion'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: RE: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
>
>
> For me the following cycle works better than working with OC4J:
> buil
JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min.
Is work being done on making
March 2006 6:35 PM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn&
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
> von Martin Marinschek
> Gesendet: Samstag, 4. März 2006 13:20
> An: Matthias Kahlau
> Cc: MyFaces Discussion
> Betreff: Re: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
>
>
> Ok, I see.
>
> so that would have o
,
Martin
On 3/4/06, Matthias Kahlau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
>
> You may deploy to another application server from JDeveloper and run it
> there, if you think OC4j does perform bad. I don't know, I use JDeveloper
> 10.1.2 and deploy
> Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
You may deploy to another application server from JDeveloper and run it
there, if you think OC4j does perform bad. I don't know, I use JDeveloper
10.1.2 and deploy directly to the JBoss deploy directory, but with less
files.
Maybe your long startup
/JSF validation is the culprit. I have
> 50+ xhtmls - and it takes the order of 10min to compile.
>
> Regards,
> Yee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 4 March 2006 6:35 PM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subje
Discussion
Subject: Re: How Does JDeveloper Compare with Java Studio Creator
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min
ually switched back to Eclipse
and JBoss, even though JDeveloper does have nicer JSF features.
Jurgen
Martin Marinschek schreef:
Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
I didn't try JSC so far - would the performance be better there? Any
experiences?
regards,
Martin
On 3/4/06, Martin
Martin Marinschek wrote:
Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
I didn't try JSC so far - would the performance be better there? Any
experiences?
regards,
Martin
No performance is not better there.
you will hang for ever in case that you open a project with 200 jsp
files.
bes
Thing = embedded OC4j in JDeveloper.
I didn't try JSC so far - would the performance be better there? Any
experiences?
regards,
Martin
On 3/4/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
>
> I was
Can you guys tell how well your IDEs would perform with large apps?
I was trying to get an app with 200 jspx files (admittedly, rather
large) up and running in JDeveloper, and the thing didn't start up
until after 10min.
Is work being done on making this situation better?
Maybe I&#x
On 3/3/06, Yee CN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there any supports for Facelets in JDeveloper or JSC? I am using
> MyEclipse – and I am seriously looking for an alternative.
Unfortunately not. Facelets has come on strong basically at
exactly the wrong point in the
On 3/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/3/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it render
> > itself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, and
> &
Is there any supports for Facelets in
JDeveloper or JSC? I am using MyEclipse – and I am seriously looking for
an alternative.
Regards,
Yee
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig McClanahan
Sent: Saturday, 4 March 2006 7:44
AM
To: MyFaces
On 3/3/06, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it renderitself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, andit works well.
Creator does that too, and it definitely works well ... the only
*required* additional code is
Why can't JSC just run the component and actually let it render
itself by default? I know that's what JDeveloper does, and
it works well.
As a component developer (I've never worked on JDeveloper itself
at all, to be explicit), I really dislike the idea of writing a bunch of
extr
On 3/3/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:> Dealing with this issue is one of the things I definitely want to> participate in here. The Creator team is finishing up some tutorials on> this that will help, and I'm doing the same thing in Shale to integrate
> the cou
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
> Dealing with this issue is one of the things I definitely want to
> participate in here. The Creator team is finishing up some tutorials on
> this that will help, and I'm doing the same thing in Shale to integrate
> the couple of non-visual components it has (subview,
On 3/2/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike Duffy schrieb:> Thx Werner.>> Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?>> Mike>Not viusally yet, the problem is, that the JSC needs some additional
classes and config files which handle the visual part (actually most ifn
On 3/2/06, Mike Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Darn.Does JSC have a component library that compares favorably with ADF Faces?
Color me biased :-), but ...
Creator 2 does indeed come with a component library above and beyond
the standard ones. It's smaller than the ADF one (about 40
componen
Darn.
Does JSC have a component library that compares favorably with ADF Faces?
Mike
--- Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Duffy schrieb:
> > Thx Werner.
> >
> > Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> Not viusally yet, the problem
FWIW, JDeveloper does support MyFaces as a custom taglib,
with visual editing, no need for any bonus config files. There's
extra metadata you can add to improve the editing experience,
which is the basis of JSR 276 (this metadata should be
standardized), but you don't need any of it
Mike Duffy schrieb:
Thx Werner.
Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
Mike
Not viusally yet, the problem is, that the JSC needs some additional
classes and config files which handle the visual part (actually most if
not all IDEs do)
nobody has done that yet, you h
each myfaces
component in design time.
it name is compLib , maybe Carig can explain more
--- Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well studio creator2 only covers the client side aspects
currently, jdeveloper is a full blown enterprise ide, with ejb3
support case too
Thx Werner.
Do you know if Java Studio Creator supports MyFaces and Tomahawk?
Mike
--- Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well studio creator2 only covers the client side aspects
> currently, jdeveloper is a full blown enterprise ide, with ejb3
> support case tools etc
Well studio creator2 only covers the client side aspects
currently, jdeveloper is a full blown enterprise ide, with ejb3
support case tools etc...
studio creator follows the absolut layout via css approach.
Both ides use heavily their own component sets (well parts of ADF have
been opensourced
Oracle came to the Austin JUG on Tuesday night and gave a very cool
presentation on JDeveloper for
JSF development.
Does anyone have any thoughts on how JDeveloper compares with Sun's Java Studio
Creator?
Does anyone have any links for objective third party comparisons?
Are there any
Could you post your stacktrace?
Regards,
Bruno
On 2/22/06, Dudu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I build the war of my application and run it at
> SunApplicationServer.
> all runs ok.
> but when I'm developing at JDeveloper and running it on standalone oracle
> j
When I build the war of my application and run it at SunApplicationServer.all runs ok.but when I'm developing at JDeveloper and running it on standalone oracle j2ee server, the jscookmenu and all other componentes who depends of extension filter do not work
the path of .js of jscoo
Take a look at the stuff I just checked in. I believe the new
TreeWalker stuff now gives you the ability to set the expanded state
of tree nodes *before* rendering. I haven't tested that aspect though
so let me know what you think.
Sean
On 1/31/06, Cristofer Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H
Jonas Jacobi wrote:
In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
you can download it from here with plenty of tutorials and other
goodies. There is also improved doc on ADF Faces.
Re post
Hi , it is very good news
Actually I personally think the UI of the oracle tool is quite fast, butI have lots of ram (Which you need for server side dev anyway, due to
the juggling between ide, app server, db etc...)I think the 2Gb on my T42p should be enough. How much do you need!? ;-)I mostly use Eclipse so it is hard to
. *wow*... I'm
> very impressed. I think I'll keep MyEclipse as my main-IDE and use
> Java Studio Creator and JDeveloper for the form-design-activities.
>
> 2006/2/1, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Nicklas Karlsson schrieb:
> > &
I just played a little bit with both applications and... *wow*... I'm
very impressed. I think I'll keep MyEclipse as my main-IDE and use
Java Studio Creator and JDeveloper for the form-design-activities.
2006/2/1, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Nicklas Karlsson schrieb:
&
Nicklas Karlsson schrieb:
> Are there any kind of student-versions avaible?
>
yes, perfectly suited for a students budget, the full version.
It is free...
Of course the bad news is that the poor student will feel like he needs
a new computer when he
starts it up for the first
> Are there any kind of student-versions avaible?>yes, perfectly suited for a students budget, the full version.
It is free...Of course the bad news is that the poor student will feel like he needs a new computer when hestarts it up for the first time and starts clicking around in the wizards ;-)
Jonas Jacobi wrote:
In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
you can download it from here with plenty of tutorials and other
goodies. There is also improved doc on ADF Faces.
Hi , it is very good news
I will
Hendrik Neumann schrieb:
(Btw. just in case anyone is interested, JSC2 also came out recently,
and it also is free, both ides are amazing rad like tools, but
JDeveloper also has the J2EE backend stuff which JSC doesnt have, while
I like the JSC2 JSF part a tad more due to the excellent CSS
> (Btw. just in case anyone is interested, JSC2 also came out recently,
> and it also is free, both ides are amazing rad like tools, but
> JDeveloper also has the J2EE backend stuff which JSC doesnt have, while
> I like the JSC2 JSF part a tad more due to the excellent CSS positionin
s, but
JDeveloper also has the J2EE backend stuff which JSC doesnt have, while
I like the JSC2 JSF part a tad more due to the excellent CSS positioning
handling)
>
> > 2006/1/30, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Jonas Jacobi schrieb:
> > > > In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
> > > >
> > > > Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
> > > > yo
e ;)
> > >
> > > Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
> > > you can download it from here with plenty of tutorials and other
> > > goodies. There is also improved doc on ADF Faces.
> > >
> > > http://otn.o
Are there any kind of student-versions avaible?
2006/1/30, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jonas Jacobi schrieb:
> > In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
> >
> > Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
> > you can dow
Hans, thanks for the explanations. I think there's another thing in my code that is not working because I get a NullPointerException when I try to call expandAll after building the tree data. When debugging the code I see a empty instance of HtmlTree class even after some iterations with buttons th
Jonas Jacobi schrieb:
In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
you can download it from here with plenty of tutorials and other
goodies. There is also improved doc on ADF Faces.
http://otn.oracle.com/jdev
Whoopie it
In case you wonder why I have been quite ;)
Today we released Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio production release -
you can download it from here with plenty of tutorials and other
goodies. There is also improved doc on ADF Faces.
http://otn.oracle.com/jdev
Thanks,
Jonas
--
Author: Pro JSF
HmI'm not sure wheter I understand you correctly. You don't need a action like commandlink, etc. For instance in the code where you provide the data for the tree you can call the function afterwards. This should work.
2006/1/27, Cristofer Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Hans! First, thanks.When I´ve
Hi Hans! First, thanks.When I´ve created a page whith a commandLink this way works fine, but how can I call the expandAll method without an action like the commandLink? How can I load the page with the tree2 in the expanded state without start an event? I did'nt find examples or information.
Thanks
Hi CristoferI know way which is also explain in the examples as I know (I think, I believe,..)First you have to to a binding to the tree2 component.binding="#{
managed-been.tree}">Then you have to implement the following code in your managed bean:/** Reference to the tree. */ private HtmlTree tr
Hi friendsafter some days using the examples, I'm trying to create a page with an expanded tree2 component, but I'm with some difficults to do so.My first try was a PhaseListener getting the ViewRoot and navigating to the tree2 component for send a expandAll message, but without success.
Then, I cr
: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Oracle JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio - Early
Access 1
Hi All,
This is just an FYI for anyone working on JSF projects. We have just
released a new version of JDeveloper that has full support for JSF, ADF
Faces, MyFaces Tomahawk, and other third party
: Jonas Jacobi
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 September 2005
00:56To: MyFaces DiscussionSubject: [ANNOUNCE] Oracle
JDeveloper 10.1.3 Studio - Early Access 1Hi
All,This is just an FYI for anyone working on JSF projects. We have
just released a new version of JDeveloper that has full
Hi All,
This is just an FYI for anyone working on JSF projects. We have just
released a new version of JDeveloper that has full support for JSF, ADF
Faces, MyFaces Tomahawk, and other third party component libraries.
Apart from the fact that it is a new release it - Oracle JDeveloper 10g
read this list, can you talk about anything more concrete?
What will it be, will myfaces be part of the JDeveloper libraries in the
future, are there works going on to make myfaces more compatible with
ADF faces (there have been issues in the past)
what parts of ADF faces will be brought into the myfaces codebase for now?
.
TopLink-ADF runtime is free-of-charge with all editions of Oracle
Application Server. If you deploy to other J2EE application servers,
you can also purchase a license to the combined TopLink-ADF bundle.
ADF design-time will continue to be included with JDeveloper--you will
be able to run ADF
Brian Abbott wrote:
Extremely cool! + A free JSF IDE (AFAIK, There arent
any free graphicall/RAD IDE's supporting JSF).
Well Exadels entry edition is free, but I would call that
graphical, since it misses the pageflow editor in the free edition.
(Dunno about all the config file drag and drop s
Darren Hartford wrote:
+1 to oracle!
Support Werner's observation of the JSF ide portion of Jdeveloper. I
have been having huge issues with JavaStudioCreator (stability, 'random'
changes, lack of component support (for myfaces of course ;-)).
Actually lack of component suppor
Hi Jonas, thanks for the clarifications, as you can see, I really like
your IDE, although some parts are still rough at the edges, which also
is understandable since the whole ide is a total rewrite.
I for instance had two times the problem of having a wrongly referenced
binding during my testr
Hi Werner,
I'm glad that you like our IDE :)
Some minor comments in line on my part (being the ADF Faces and JDev
guy on the list ;).
Werner Punz wrote:
I had
JDeveloper lingering on my HD for a while, but never
gave it a serious run due to the licensing issues, because I const
Christian Daszenies wrote:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=34781
Wow, this is really cool. I was also just looking through the ADF Faces
components and they look really cool. I hope they contribute these to
MyFaces or at least make them freely usable.
Rich
+1 to oracle!
Support Werner's observation of the JSF ide portion of Jdeveloper. I
have been having huge issues with JavaStudioCreator (stability, 'random'
changes, lack of component support (for myfaces of course ;-)).
Jdeveloper picks up where JavaStudioCreator lacks -- just
I had JDeveloper lingering on my HD for a while, but never
gave it a serious run due to the licensing issues, because I constantly
work on a budget here.
But I rechecked the JSF part after the announcement, that one is
absolutely excellent.
The form designer is absolutely wonderful, it is
Brian Abbott wrote:
I would be curious to know how oracle as a core
contributor will actually play out. Does that mean
they will dedicate one or more engineers to MyFaces
full time each and every day?!?! I mean... that's the
annual equivalent of a few hundred thousand dollars
plus opportunity co
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
