PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 7:23 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: general myfaces performance question
I cannot subsribe to it. Get the following error:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
hrm,
strange. the apache infrastructure guys ?
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cannot subsribe to it. Get the following error:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
:)
take it that way.
wiki is agil ... :)
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Found it on the Wiki -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes it's difficult to remember that wiki is more correct than the
website.
Thanks.
Aneesha
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wel
I cannot subsribe to it. Get the following error:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 12): 552 spam score (5.5) excee
Found it on the Wiki - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes it's difficult to remember that wiki is more correct than the
website.
Thanks.
Aneesha
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well how do I subscribe to the mailing list? The subscribe links aren't
links here - http://incubator
Well how do I subscribe to the mailing list? The subscribe links aren't
links here -
http://incubator.apache.org/adffaces/trinidad-build/mail-lists.html
Is it the standard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Aneesha
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mailing list works, I am on
mailing list works, I am on
check the trinidad wiki for nbuilds (from continuum)
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Trinidad
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I am aware of the Oracle connection. When I was evaluating what to use
for my project, I could not find a download
Yes, I am aware of the Oracle connection. When I was evaluating what to use
for my project, I could not find a download location anywhere on the
incubator. Only source was available. The mailing list did not work either.
It looked very useful from documentation et al.
So how do I go about it if I
Hi,
Thomas Spiegl and me have made sure you can use Tomahawk (snapshot)
with Trinidad w/o problems.
Try it - if there is a problem, come back to us and tell us about it.
regards,
Martin
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it works
in some (sample) apps I mix the two,
it works
in some (sample) apps I mix the two, because that is a common question,
when talking about Trinidad.
Almost everybody is asking about Tomahawk support, sometimes they ask
about other libs too
-M
On 11/16/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulath (AKA: Murat HAZER) schrieb:
> Do
Yes it is!
I am not saying that because I am a committer. I say that for the
following reason:
The Trinidad components are around the JSF community since years
(formal Oracle code)
They have been developed / tested /.../ in a corperate mind.
Incubation doesn't mean the stuff is instable. incubat
Sure, think about the history before trinidad has come to incubator.
It was oracle internal, so they have already used it in their webapps.
Apart from this, the usage of trinidad is emerging, also in some
real-world web-apps.
cheers,
Gerald
On 11/16/06, Aneesha Govil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ulath (AKA: Murat HAZER) schrieb:
> Does trinidad have any incompatibilities with tomahawk components and
> facelets?
>
There has been some serious work done with the integration of both
complibs lately, if you want to mix it you should use the trunk, but to
my knowledge it should work (have not tr
Trinidad works with FAcelets and Tomahawk (use 1.1.5 for that)
(since commandXXX and form where making some problems)
On 11/16/06, Ulath (AKA: Murat HAZER) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does trinidad have any incompatibilities with tomahawk components and
facelets?
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendor
Is it alright to use Trinidad while it is still in the incubator?
Aneesha
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high
performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as
Struts for performance (probably b
Does trinidad have any incompatibilities with tomahawk components and
facelets?
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
get a student :)
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I don't. Time for the example app being ported ;)
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
get a student :)
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, I don't. Time for the example app being ported ;)
regards,
Martin
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do you have numbers for that "better than struts" ?
>
> On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek
No, I don't. Time for the example app being ported ;)
regards,
Martin
On 11/16/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
do you have numbers for that "better than struts" ?
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He should definitely take the Trinidad component se
do you have numbers for that "better than struts" ?
On 11/16/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high
performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as
Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do
He should definitely take the Trinidad component set for high
performance requirements, with this, you're in the same region as
Struts for performance (probably better - cause if you do it yourself,
you won't get the same optimized state-saving as is implemented in
Trinidad).
regards,
Martin
On
20 matches
Mail list logo