')
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussionusers@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
kellerklr
, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussionusers@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
kellerklr...@gmail.com
wrote:
This mailing list isn't very
with MyFaces-2,
OpenWebBeans, CODI, OpenJPA2 and our servers are pretty 'cold')
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorfmat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussionusers@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday
Rychkovnikolay.rych...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nikolay Rychkovnikolay.rych...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussionusers@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 2:02 AM
GAE does not support it.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3431q
Rychkov nikolay.rych...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nikolay Rychkov nikolay.rych...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 2:02 AM
GAE does not support it.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id
. But they e.g. still ship a very old jetty container
which contains lots of known bugs.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 12/6/10, Nikolay Rychkov nikolay.rych...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Nikolay Rychkov nikolay.rych...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Monday, December 6, 2010, 8:42 PM
Which of the 3 styles is best? Am I
missing one?
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
wrote:
Yes, I feared that :(
They have a relative
. In general I'd say that one should generally use CDI instead
of
the JSF @ManagedBean mechanism.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 12/4/10, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users
a few things on GAE in the past.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sun, 12/5/10, ken keller klr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: ken keller klr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 8:14 PM
I don't see how CDI helps. I tried 3
, ken keller klr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: ken keller klr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Sunday, December 5, 2010, 8:14 PM
I don't see how CDI helps. I tried 3
ways:
X denotes the value of the ID.
1) Pass id
wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
keller klr...@gmail.com
wrote:
This mailing list isn't very
, OpenJPA2 and our servers are pretty 'cold')
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday
...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Saturday, December 4, 2010, 3:45 PM
... or, you know, use CDI for your
managed beans ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2010/12/4 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Sorry, I just skimmed your mail
Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Saturday, December 4, 2010, 3:45 PM
... or, you know, use CDI for your
managed beans ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2010/12/4 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com:
Hi
'cold')
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
keller klr...@gmail.com
wrote:
This mailing list isn't very active. Most of the
messages
.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, ken keller klr...@gmail.com wrote
From: ken keller klr...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 4:44 PM
1Mpvs/day on which URL?
mojarra looks inactive:
http://java.net
Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 7:44 AM
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken
keller klr...@gmail.com
wrote
,
OpenWebBeans, CODI, OpenJPA2 and our servers are pretty 'cold')
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Subject: Re: myfaces popularity
To: MyFaces Discussion users@myfaces.apache.org
This mailing list isn't very active. Most of the messages seem to be about
component libs like Trinidad.
Is myfaces popular?
Wouldn't a searchable group be more convenient than a mailing list?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:28 AM, ken keller klr...@gmail.com wrote:
This mailing list isn't very active. Most of the messages seem to be about
component libs like Trinidad.
Is myfaces popular?
yes it is.
Wouldn't a searchable group be more convenient than a mailing list?
the archives *are*
21 matches
Mail list logo
