Osvaldo wrote on 22 Jul 06:
> Hi:
>There are unofficial prepackaged versions of OpenOffice
> by SUSE/Novell in
> ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/10.1-i386/2.0.3-1
> and mirrors (check the SUSE version (10.1) and the
> architecture (i386)).
> Download the packages you want
Hi:
There are unofficial prepackaged versions of OpenOffice
by SUSE/Novell in
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/OpenOffice.org/10.1-i386/2.0.3-1
and mirrors (check the SUSE version (10.1) and the
architecture (i386)).
Download the packages you want to upgrade to an empty
directory and run f
Dave Barton wrote at 17:48 on 21 Jul:
> On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:41 -0700, James E. Lang wrote:
> > Dave Barton wrote at 22:46 on 21 Jul 2006:
> >
> > > ... Victor's issue was related to the Linux installation of OOo. Since the
> > > introduction of OOo version 2.0 the installation procedure for L
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:41 -0700, James E. Lang wrote:
> Dave Barton wrote at 22:46 on 21 Jul 2006:
>
> > ... Victor's issue was related to the Linux installation of OOo. Since the
> > introduction of OOo version 2.0 the installation procedure for Linux is very
> > different to that for Windows.
Dave Barton wrote at 22:46 on 21 Jul 2006:
> ... Victor's issue was related to the Linux installation of OOo. Since the
> introduction of OOo version 2.0 the installation procedure for Linux is very
> different to that for Windows. The situation for Linux users is further
> complicated by the diff
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 14:10 +, Don Cochron wrote:
> I have Windows XP SP2. I completely uninstalled 2.0.2 and then
> installed 2.0.3. I have done this on two desktops I have with
> absolutely no problems.
>
> Don
Hi Don,
Pleased to hear you have not had any problems. However, Victor's issue
w
I have Windows XP SP2. I completely uninstalled 2.0.2 and then installed 2.0.3.
I have done this on two desktops I have with absolutely no problems.
Don
-- Original message from Victor Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
> Victor Chapman wrote:
> > What is the correct pr
Victor Chapman wrote:
> What is the correct process to upgrade from ver. 2.0.2 to 2.0.3. I have
> tried this a couple of times and end up with a hybrid the old and the new.
Note, I am trying to install 2.0.3
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
