This is an excellent post which I think highlights the need for us to
properly define the scopes of our current components, their roadmaps, and
the vision we have for Qpid and AMQP 1.0.
I know some people have already replied in thread, but would it seem like a
good idea if we used these
On 10/10/2013 09:38 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
My main concern is that I believe that Qpid should be primarily directed at
implementing AMQP standards, and building resuable toolkits and components
that fit into any AMQP network. I'd be very concerned if we were inventing
alternative management
On 10 October 2013 12:46, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/10/2013 10:58 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
I think the point of Qpid (vs. any other messaging
implementation at Apache or elsewhere) is to implement the AMQP
specification.
I have no disagreement when the AMQP specification is
Makes sense; thank you for your help.
Branden
-Original Message-
From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday 2013.10.09 17:43
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unable to connect to broker via Qpid JMS-over-AMQP client
The 1.0 client has no built in
Hi all,
I am currently trying to swap in qpid-cpp v0.18 to replace an unreliable
activemq server installation. The connection is protected with client
certificates.
When the client tries the connect, the qpid-client v0.24 reports a
java.net.SocketException: Broken pipe and then hangs solid,
On 10/10/2013 05:08 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
More investigation has shown that someone had hard coded the qpid ampq v1.0
driver directly into the code, which was taking precedence. With that removed
we're now getting further, but still not out of the woods:
javax.jms.JMSException: Failed to
On 10/10/2013 11:20 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
On 10 October 2013 15:35, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/10/2013 04:38 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote:
My main concern is that I believe that Qpid should be primarily directed
at implementing AMQP standards, and building resuable toolkits and
Hi guys,
-Original Message-
From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:21 AM
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: Qpid Dispatch Router component
On 10 October 2013 15:35, Ted Ross tr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/10/2013 04:38 AM,
On 10 Oct 2013, at 6:36 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes it does, but the configuration is entirely different between these two
clients. In particular I don't believe the 0.8/0-9-1/0-10 client uses 'amqps'
to indicate ssl is to be used:
