Maria:
"I don't use modules like Roman, I use Maven modules and, like you, I have
a hierarchy of pom's"
Ok, so there is perhaps a difference of vocabulary here, and the issue for
you is quite unrelated to the issue that Roman has.
Maven 'modules' in this case represent different compilation
On December 9, 2020 I compiled a release version that worked. It had much less
code but the structure and mvc implementations using crux was the same.
I will do a first test with SDK 0.9.9 and the code at that time and if it gives
error I will compile the SDK to that date.
Hiedra
De: Maria
Hi Greg, yes.
I did a production deployment over 6 months ago and it worked. I had in mind to
look for "that point" in the repository and maybe it's already time... I don't
usually give up, but I lack the knowledge to solve this, I'm bugging and
bugging Harb and I've done 100 tests without
Sorry I have not been following these threads in detail because I have been
(and am currently still) on vacation.
AFAIK royale modules are not reliable in release mode. I don't know anyone
who has had experience otherwise. I did try testing them some time ago and
that was my experience, and I
Yes.
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021, 23:03 Harbs, wrote:
> Did you apply the input_file options to the module?
>
> On Dec 30, 2021, at 11:42 PM, Roman Isitua wrote:
>
>
> I have applied the js compiler option as follows
>
>
>
Did you apply the input_file options to the module?
> On Dec 30, 2021, at 11:42 PM, Roman Isitua wrote:
>
>
> I have applied the js compiler option as follows
>
> -source-map=false;-compiler.show-binding-warnings=false;-js-default-initializers=true;-js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true;
>
No Harb, we have in common the Maven compilation and the use of Maven modules.
But I take this opportunity to show you a "curious" test, look at the error
displayed in the Debug Console... (The sdk compiled from develop the error
references the js-debug folder, even though it is running from
Wait. I’m confused.
Does your app work? I’m assuming that your app is not the same as Roman’s.
> On Dec 30, 2021, at 8:07 PM, Maria Jose Esteve wrote:
>
> I was preparing an email with a battery of tests but I don't use any
> configuration or property files... maybe I'd better stop and read
I’d try removing these:
-export-public-symbols=false;-prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false;-prevent-rename-public-symbols=false;-prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false;
https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/create-an-application/optimizations/minification#smallest-size
> On Dec 30, 2021, at
I was preparing an email with a battery of tests but I don't use any
configuration or property files... maybe I'd better stop and read it to you.
Hiedra
De: Harbs
Enviado el: jueves, 30 de diciembre de 2021 18:56
Para: users@royale.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Compiling Modules (was Re: Load time is
Kindly clarify what you mean by "no 1. Get rid of aggressive mimification
options " ? Which of the options are aggressive ?
I will apply no 2 and revert with my findings.
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021, 18:56 Harbs, wrote:
> 1. I’d get rid of the agressive minification options. It will likely cause
>
1. I’d get rid of the agressive minification options. It will likely cause
issues. If you get it to work without those options, you can try to add them
back in and see if it still works.
2. You seem to be missing the compiler options explained here:
I think it will be better for me to share my pom's that way you can see all
the compilation options used. The pom for the parent (FmClient2), the
MainApp and one module (Overview) have been attached to this email.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 6:22 PM Harbs wrote:
> Roman, can you share your full
Roman, can you share your full compiler options?
> I decided to remove the below settings completely
> -export-public-symbols=false
> -prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
> -prevent-rename-public-symbols=false
> -prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false
>
>
> I enabled the below settings
>
>
Hi Harb,
Thanks for your response. I have gone through the documentation. I will do
my test again starting with the smallest size option and share my findings.
Regards,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 10:59 AM Harbs wrote:
> Sorry for my deal in responding.
>
> Let’s take a step back.
>
> I’m not
Sorry for my deal in responding.
Let’s take a step back.
I’m not sure how you are compiling your modules. I just added some content to
the module documentation page which explains what compiler options you need
while compiling modules. (It still needs some editing.)
16 matches
Mail list logo
