2013-07-07 01:25 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta:
OpenChange limitation only work for users less than 100
? Are you really?
OpenChange just an extension for Samba 4 AD for the exchange
compatibility. So, where is the limit?
In the Samba 4 (cannot create more user in AD) or in the OpenChange
Ludovic Marcotte did acknowledge it by saying He's most likely talking
about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation
I also were told the same by my vendor before.
On Sunday, July 7, 2013, Szládovics Péter wrote:
2013-07-07 01:25 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta:
OpenChange
2013-07-07 11:37 keltezéssel, Mail Robot írta:
Ludovic Marcotte did acknowledge it by saying He's most likely
talking about the SOGo/OpenChange part - which has this limitation
I also were told the same by my vendor before.
I never seen similar notices in any docs, but are can exist...
BTW
I managed to solve this problem.
It was all to do with permissions on /var/log/sogo/
For some reason, the permissions were wrong, because of uid changing during
installs.
On 30 June 2013 18:43, Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
I have kinda made a step fwd. I can run sogo from
Am 26.06.2013 20:53, schrieb Steven Hiscocks:
On 26/06/13 16:20, Igor wrote:
Hi folks,
first: I'm new here. Thanks for the great work on SOGo.
Here is my problem, may be somebody can help:
I compiled SOPE 2.0.6 and SOGo 2.0.6a on OpenSUSE 12.2 32-bit.
GNUstep is from
OpenSUSE repository
Ok,
Then, let's step back and look at this..
If you look at my last letter, I have provided some insight: lowest common
factor on ability, screenshots, etc.
Table of Contents, Glossary, Cross-references, external references,
templating I believe these to be pretty standard solutions
Exactly.
Guys,
I have evaluated all of the groupware mentioned below as well as egroupware and
a couple of others JUNK.
SOGo is THE product right now in regards to well-engineered, not resource
hungry, easy to use, etc, etc. KUDOS
However,
despite all the products that I evaluated
2013-07-07 19:59 keltezéssel, c.schm...@briefdomain.de írta:
It's true what you are saying, currently i'm planning some sogo deployments,
one with a LDAP (FreeIPA) Backend and one with a postgresql Backend. Currently
I'm playing around with postgresql and it isn't really easy with this
The documentation says SOGoLoginDomains parameter used to define which
domains should
be selectable from the login page. This parameter is an array of keys from
the domains dictionary.
In a situation of single or even multiple domains, I'd love to have a user
only input their username and then
I know that it is not a problem of sogo, but i'm a developer and not a
system administrator. I mean if I really want to make use of sogo i
wouldn't want to go through thousands of documentations, just to have a
good and working installation.
i mean, you configured your apache right? i don't think
Yes, it's true too.
But the sogo not a complete system, it's only the part of a system.
Sogo just a frontend for any imap server, authenticate from any ldap and
stores the card/calendar informations any database.
Sogo works with cyrus? Yes. Works with dovecot? Yes. Works with courier?
Yes.
I appreciate the discussion, and I appreciate having clear, concise
documentation.
However, I find the SOGo documentation adequate for me, even though I am
a relatively inexperienced administrator (having come from the Microsoft
side of things to Linux and open source)
IF the same amount of
helloI m following this discution with some interest and some of the words makes me Exchange in 4 hours ? you dream Exchange is a complicated system and you have to learn about a lot of things too .Try to make public activesync for example without reverse proxy and your windows will be hacked
I will evaluate SOGo on my own, but since our enviroment uses 389DS
(FreeIPA) your script won't work.
And btw. you evaluated SOGo and created that script. I wanted to just make
a simple comparsion.
Total newb of sogo, total newb of active directory. As another one posted
it's currently not
Would you please send me this script, I am willing to try SOGo again if
this will work..
Thanks
PK
On 07/07/2013 01:32 PM, Szládovics Péter wrote:
Yes, it's true too.
But the sogo not a complete system, it's only the part of a system.
Sogo just a frontend for any imap server, authenticate
I'm ok with all of the open discussion.
However, I'm far from inexperienced and I'd like to think I'm fairly
intelligent.
I've seen good documentation and I can see the difference of what's being
discussed here.
Once you go outside the cookie cutter world of the existing documentation,
well,
On 2013-07-07 5:46 PM, Paul Pathiakis wrote:
Let's face it, I have enough work in my own life. I've offered some
very simple things that could be done, and it seems that people want
me to do the documentation or just be quiet. That's fine.
Because two folks told you they like the doc how it is
Absolutely fantastic, Szládovics! Good for you!
(and, yes, we'd be interested)
On 07/07/2013 04:32 PM, Szládovics Péter wrote:
But I can build a sogo about 30 minutes from booting Ubuntu setup cd
till first incoming/outgoing mail with the fresh installed system.
How? I created a script for
And that was the point of the comment. :-)
You're very intuitive and insightful.
I'm always open to constuctive criticism. However, saying it's fine the way
it is in certain instances is ludicrous. Just like the code will mature and
refine over time, the documentation must do the same.
And this is brilliant, too.
Can it also be extended?
Can the user be prompted for simple things?
Database server type?
Server Address?
Database type?
MTA mail type?
Server Address?
LDA type?
Server Address?
:-) Just continue to improve the installation. Make it close to turnkey.
When
This problem (ie. time-consuming and error-prone installations) is
FAR broader than SOGo... and existing solutions used in the industry
aren't optimal and/or have serious tradeoffs eg. bundling a product in a
specialist distro or custom VM etc...
I'm working on a project which, amongst
From someone that just started looking at Sogo.
It seems you have solved the major road block with mail servers and that
is native integration of Outlook.
I am wondering why the product doesn't get more open source exposure.
There are only 1039 users on the mail list and looks like ~30
Hi,
Facing an strange issue here. I deploy Thunderbird 17.0.5 with lightning
1.9.1 sogo-integrator/connector 17.0.5 to windows clients in an way,
that lightning and sogo addons are bundled as hidden addons. Means they
reside in
C:\Program Files(x86)\mozilla thunderbird\distribution\bundles\.
Did an test with an fresh deployed thunderbird, the calendar looks like this
http://abload.de/image.php?img=lightningjws9y.jpg
Now I went into
C:\Program Files(x86)\Mozilla
Thunderbird\distribution\bundles\sogo-integra...@inverse.ca\chrome\content
And removed everything at first then i
24 matches
Mail list logo
