-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
That seems to have resolved it.
Stu
On 07/15/2016 05:44 AM, Patrice Levesque (pleves...@inverse.ca) wrote:
>
>>> Looks like there's a redirect? W: Failed to fetch
>>> http://inverse.ca/debian/dists/wheezy/wheezy/binary-amd64/Packages
>>> 301
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Looks like there's a redirect?
Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en_US
Ign http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy Translation-en
Err http://inverse.ca wheezy/wheezy amd64 Packages
301 Moved Permanently [IP: 2607:5300:60:37b8::2:1 80]
W:
assuming that something is happening out
of order here, but I'm not a programmer so at best this is a guess...
Debian Wheezy 64 bit
SOGo 2.2.3-1
libsope 4.9.r1664.20140403
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Stu
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
- --
Hey nineteen Thats retha franklin, She dont remember
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks Francis,
Stu
On 07/18/2011 05:38 AM, Francis Lachapelle wrote:
Hi Stuart
On 2011-07-17, at 12:43 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
I have not attempted (nor currently plan) to implement the two new
global domain settings.
Should I
upgrade issues?
Thanks in advance,
Stu
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
On 07/17/2011 08:14 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
* Dennis Petschull users@sogo.nu:
can you also confirm, that calendar and addressbook sharing is not
working anymore now?
I can't confirm that part of the problem. I was able
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Your problem is the 'id' keys. They must be unique across all domains.
The 2nd and 3rd domains have the same 'id' value.
Stu
On 04/29/2011 03:21 AM, Jean-Michel OLTRA wrote:
Bonjour,
Le vendredi 29 avril 2011, André Schild a écrit...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I had the same problem. the fix was to change the following in the
/etc/memcached.conf file:
- - -l 127.0.0.1
+ -l localhost
It has to do with IPv6 I believe.
Hope this helps!
Stu
On 02/10/2011 04:57 AM, Federico Alberto Sayd wrote:
Hello:
Hi all,
Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I had a
couple recurring appointments that were configured on my Android that
were causing the problem. I don't really understand why though, but for
now it's fixed.
Stu
On 01/29/2011 10:29 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Hi
that kept messing up the SOGo calendar.
Will post back if I find anything and file a bug if it's actually SOGo
that is causing the issue.
Stu
On 01/30/2011 09:39 AM, fasil wrote:
On 01/30/2011 08:34 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Hi all,
Looks like this was actually a problem with the calendar itself. I
down app when vmem 384 MB
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| version 1.3.5 (build
@vizzini.inverse.ca 201101271844) -- starting
Jan 29 10:22:28 sogod [2529]: |SOGo| vmem size check enabled: shutting
down app when vmem 384 MB
Any help would be great!
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm using Calendar Sync 0.9.4.6 Beta for bi-directional sync using Cal
Dav on 2.2 with an G2
Stu
On 01/26/2011 06:33 AM, Stéphane PERON wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed funambol v9 and created sogo-card and card in
FunambolSOGoConnector
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You will be missed... g
Stu
On 01/06/2011 08:26 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 11-01-06 11:13 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
I have on good authority that the SOGo project has been offered a booth
at SCALE this year.
Indeed.
Are you folks going
'.
Error log shows no errors or warnings.
Please advise any additional tests you would like us to run...
Again, should we file a bug report?
Thanks again in advance,
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
On 01/05/2011 02:52 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Any Additional Ideas On this???
Stu
On 01/04/2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks Ludovic,
Added to bug tracking.
Stu
On 01/06/2011 11:23 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 11-01-06 1:25 PM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Ok, Here is a summary of what we are seeing... Should I file a bug
report?
[snip]
Yes, please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is it possible that the user has so many emails that the server is
hitting a byte limit of some sort?
On 01/06/2011 12:54 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote:
Still need some ideas on this one... thanks!
Chris
On 1/5/11 2:00 PM, Chris Hobbs wrote:
I
office systems run Squeeze 64bit, and my laptop runs 32bit Ubuntu.
Sorry for not bringing this fact out sooner. Please advise on any
additional steps you would like us to do to test this further.
Thanks in advance,
Stuart Sheldon
ACT USA
On 12/21/2010 09:14 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Hi Ludovic
.
These conditions exist on several client installs on different OSs.
Thoughts?
Stu
On 12/15/2010 01:23 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 10-12-15 11:42 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Now, I starting to think that this is by design and not a bug or problem
with the software. Is this the case?
It's definitively
:
On 10-12-14 9:27 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Hi Ludovic,
Here it is... All we did was add our servers FQDN...
Looks good.
Everything else works great... I'm wondering if the icons are missing
from the package? Or maybe a .js setting is missing? Those would be
issues that would show up
13, 2010 at 10:29:26PM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Hey Mark,
I can see the status of the attendees in the web based version when I
select the attendee's link, but in Lightning, the 'status icon' is
missing next to the attendee's names.
Is this a bug?
Stu
On 12/13/2010 03:57 PM, Mark
/
/li
/Seq
/RDF
On 12/14/2010 06:14 AM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote:
On 10-12-14 9:12 AM, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
Not sure where to turn on caldav scheduling... Here is what is installed:
Thunderbird 3.1.6
Lightning 1.0b2.104i
Inverse connector 3.104
Inverse Integrator 3.104
From web interface I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting
invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'?
Stu
- --
Open up the window Let some air into this room I think I'm almost
chokin' From the smell
again to see who has accepted.
Regards,
Mark
On 13 Dec 2010, at 18:47, Stuart Sheldon s...@actusa.net wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to look and see who has not responded to a meeting
invitation other then selecting 'Compose email to undecided attendees'?
Stu
--
users@sogo.nu
https
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Since it looks like you are rewriting the whole site, why not just use
Redirect?
Redirect / https://192.168.0.200/
Now, anything going to port 80 will be redirected. It will also deal
with anything after the / as well.
Just a thought...
Stu
On
23 matches
Mail list logo
