Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-20 Thread Christian Mack
Am 2014-01-17 21:47, schrieb Tanstaafl: On 2014-01-17 3:11 PM, Sean M. Pappalardo spappala...@renegadetech.com wrote: On 01/09/2014 05:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: With our Active Sync support coming up (it'll show up in the source tree tomorrow), you'll be able to use Outlook 2013 natively

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-17 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-17 3:11 PM, Sean M. Pappalardo spappala...@renegadetech.com wrote: On 01/09/2014 05:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: With our Active Sync support coming up (it'll show up in the source tree tomorrow), you'll be able to use Outlook 2013 natively without Samba4/OpenChange That's

Aw: Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-10 Thread Daniel Müller
So with the new feature Active Sync I do not need any Echange or Openchange to have shared calenders and tasks planning? Gesendet:Freitag, 10. Januar 2014 um 02:32 Uhr Von:Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca An:users@sogo.nu Betreff:Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features? On 2014-01-09 3

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-10 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-09 8:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 2014-01-09 3:34 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: Well, since we are planning on offering Outlook to users here as well as Thunderbird, this is critically important to me. With our Active Sync support coming up (it'll show up in the

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-10 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2014-01-10 7:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: What about earlier version of Outlook (specifically 2010)? Outlook 2003... 2010 will still require OpenChange/Samba4. It's still an important piece of software for SOGo and we don't plan to move away from it because we add Active Sync support. These

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-10 Thread Helge Hess
On Jan 10, 2014, at 1:52 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: What about earlier version of Outlook (specifically 2010)? ActiveSync support is a new feature in Outlook 2013 and not available in older versions. hh -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-10 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-10 8:32 AM, Ludovic Marcotte lmarco...@inverse.ca wrote: On 2014-01-10 7:52 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: What about earlier version of Outlook (specifically 2010)? Outlook 2003... 2010 will still require OpenChange/Samba4. It's still an important piece of software for SOGo and we don't

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-09 Thread Steve Boley
No my problems have stemmed from how it's interacting with samba4 and windows AD. I used my own user account for testing and somehow my openchange account is corrupted and when it reads it back from the schema even after blowing it away and starting over, keeps giving me errors where it can't

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-09 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-08 3:53 PM, Steve Boley st...@nams.net wrote: No my problems have stemmed from how it's interacting with samba4 and windows AD. I used my own user account for testing and somehow my openchange account is corrupted and when it reads it back from the schema even after blowing it away

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-09 Thread Ludovic Marcotte
On 2014-01-09 3:34 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: Well, since we are planning on offering Outlook to users here as well as Thunderbird, this is critically important to me. With our Active Sync support coming up (it'll show up in the source tree tomorrow), you'll be able to use Outlook 2013 natively

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-08 Thread Christian Mack
Hello Tanstaafl Am 2014-01-03 11:53, schrieb Tanstaafl: I was just wondering if there is anything planned in this area. It is the one thing that SOGo lacks as compared to some of the other Groupware options out there (Zimbra, Horde, etc). We will be implementing SOGo soon, and I'm

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-08 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-08 7:43 AM, Christian Mack christian.m...@uni-konstanz.de wrote: Hello Tanstaafl What do you understand as collaboration features? I ask, because email is used for collaboration, appointments are used for collaboration and address books are used for collaboration. They all can be

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-08 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-08 10:31 AM, Steve Boley st...@nams.net wrote: I'm dragging on sogo because of issues with the openchange portion and its limitations because I have users who don't want to get rid of crappy outlook and it's propensity to complicate and magically have corrupted data files in it. Are

Re: [SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-08 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2014-01-08 1:36 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: On 2014-01-08 10:31 AM, Steve Boley st...@nams.net wrote: I'm dragging on sogo because of issues with the openchange portion and its limitations because I have users who don't want to get rid of crappy outlook and it's propensity

[SOGo] Plans for collaboration features?

2014-01-03 Thread Tanstaafl
Hello, I was just wondering if there is anything planned in this area. It is the one thing that SOGo lacks as compared to some of the other Groupware options out there (Zimbra, Horde, etc). We will be implementing SOGo soon, and I'm seriously hoping it eliminates all of the massive