On 2014-01-09 8:32 PM, Ludovic Marcotte <lmarco...@inverse.ca> wrote:
On 2014-01-09 3:34 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Well, since we are planning on offering Outlook to users here as well
as Thunderbird, this is critically important to me.
With our Active Sync support coming up (it'll show up in the source tree
tomorrow), you'll be able to use Outlook 2013 natively without
Samba4/OpenChange - which can be a challenging piece of software to
install/maintain.
That is *fantastic* news about not needing samba4/openchange, but...
What about earlier version of Outlook (specifically 2010)?
We have standardized on this version of office, and will probably stay
there for the foreseeable future. Having to upgrade to 2013 would not be
an insignificant cost.
It isn't a deal breaker, but again, the vast majority of our (eOpen)
licenses (60+) are for 2010.
Thanks Ludovic!
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
